Clinical Chemistry Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 20: 615-616, 1974;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trudnowski, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rico, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trudnowski, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rico, R. C.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 20, 615-616, Copyright © 1974 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Specific Gravity of Blood and Plasma at 4 and 37 °C

Raymond J. Trudnowski 1 and Rodolfo C. Rico 1

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, New York State Department of Health, 666 Elm St., Buffalo, N. Y. 14203.

The specific gravity (relative density) of human whole blood and plasma from 25 healthy volunteers was determined gravimetrically. For whole blood it was found to be 1.0621 (95% confidence interval: 1.0652-1.0590) at 4 °C and 1.0506 (95% confidence interval: 1.0537-1.0475) at 37 °C. Plasma specific gravity was 1.0310 (95% confidence interval: 1.0324-1.0296) at 4 °C and 1.0205 (95% confidence interval: 1.0216-1.0193) at 37 °C. All of these values are referred to the density of water at 4 °C. We show the relationship between these values and those given in the literature for measurements at 25 °C. There was a small increase in whole blood specific gravity with increasing hematocrit, but it was not statistically significant over the 40-56 hematocrit range studied.

Submitted on January 28, 1974
Accepted on February 25, 1974




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
R. Ben-Ami, M. Weinberger, R. Orni-Wasserlauff, D. Schwartz, A. Itzhaki, T. Lazarovitch, E. Bash, Y. Aharoni, I. Moroz, and M. Giladi
Time to Blood Culture Positivity as a Marker for Catheter-Related Candidemia
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2008; 46(7): 2222 - 2226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. G. Connell, M. Rele, D. Cowley, J. P. Buttery, and N. Curtis
How Reliable Is a Negative Blood Culture Result? Volume of Blood Submitted for Culture in Routine Practice in a Children's Hospital
Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): 891 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.