|
|
||||||||
Clinical Chemistry, Vol 23, 2242-2246, Copyright © 1977 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry
JD Peele Jr, RH Gadsden and R Crews
Semi-automated reflectance readings of urinalysis dipsticks showed better precision than visual readings in the case of artificially prepared urine samples containing glucose, ketone, and protein. Actual pathological specimens containing glucose, protein, and nitrite also showed that instrumental readings were better than visual. Results of repeated visual readings spread over three different color blocks for certain concentrations of glucose, ketone, and protein, whereas repeated instrumental readings were never spread greater than two color blocks. Subjectivity can be reduced by semi-automated dipstick urinalysis.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
P. Froom, R. Etzion, and M. Barak What Is an Abnormal Test Strip Urinary Erythrocyte Concentration? Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 673 - 675. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Penders, T. Fiers, and J. R. Delanghe Quantitative Evaluation of Urinalysis Test Strips Clin. Chem., December 1, 2002; 48(12): 2236 - 2241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Froom, B. Bieganiec, Z. Ehrenrich, and M. Barak Stability of Common Analytes in Urine Refrigerated for 24 h before Automated Analysis by Test Strips Clin. Chem., September 1, 2000; 46(9): 1384 - 1386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |