Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 23: 460-463, 1977;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Webb, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Webb, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, C. N.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 23, 460-463, Copyright © 1977 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Ion pair extraction technique with azure A, for differentiating biles of normal subjects and patients with liver disease from patients with Crohn's disease with small bowel involvement

GR Webb, IA Macdonald and CN Williams

The ion pair extraction technique with Azure A solution, chloroform/methanol (equal volumes), and dilute sulfuric acid, was used to study bile-rich duodenal aspirates of (a) healthy volunteers and patients with (b) cholestatic liver disease, (c) Crohn's disease with small bowel involvement, and (d) those with primarily colon involvement. Duplicate aliquots of extracted duodenal aspirates from these four groups were subjected to ion pair extraction, with and without prior acetylation, and the absorbance ratios at 645 nm without acetylation/with acetylation ("acetylation index") compared; values (+/- SD) obtained were 0.052 +/- 0.0098, 0.038 +/- 0.014, 0.136 +/- 0.048, and 0.077 +/- 0.056, respectively, for the four groups. The acetylation index for group c was significantly (P less than 0.001) different from that of groups a and b. All other intergroup comparisons were not significant. The acetylation index correlated positively (r = 0.922) with the ratio of glycine- to taurine-conjugated bile acids, measured independently, implying that it reflects this ratio.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.