Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 23: 477-484, 1977;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bretz, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bretz, N. S.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 23, 477-484, Copyright © 1977 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Evaluation of a semi-automated blood urea nitrogen analyzer

DJ Hanson and NS Bretz

We compared results for urea concentrations in plasma and serum as measured with the Kimble Blood Urea Nitrogen Analyzer method as the test method with those determined by continuous-flow analysis (AutoAnalyzer 1 method) as the comparison method. We evaluated accuracy and precision for patients' samples, National Bureau of Standards Standard Reference Material, College of American Pathologists Survey Validated Reference Materials, and College of American Pathologists Quality Assurance Service control materials. We found the test method to be more accurate and precise than the comparison method.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.