Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 28: 655-658, 1982;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montalvo, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jenevin, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montalvo, J. G., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Jenevin, R. M., Jr

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 28, 655-658, Copyright © 1982 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Analysis of phosphate in serum with the phosphate redox electrode system

JG Montalvo Jr, LA Truxillo, RA Wawro, TA Watkins, A Phillips and RM Jenevin Jr

A phosphate redox electrode system (PRES) was designed, constructed, and evaluated for analysis of inorganic phosphate in serum. This system is based on the observed phosphate ion potential of a chemically treated iron wire in a turbulent flow-through cell at constant oxygen tension. We analyzed 110 clinical samples by this technique and with the Technicon SMAC. Of the specimens analyzed, 32% contained abnormal phosphate concentrations. Each was assayed two to four times with the PRES and once with the SMAC. The PRES assay rate was 60 samples/h. Mean phosphorus concentrations (and SEM) were: PRES, range of values for replicate data sets, 30.5-31.0 (0.5-1.1) mg/L; SMAC, 30.8 (1.0) mg/L. Results for the PRES (y) correlated well with those by the SMAC: r = 0.968 to 0.980, estimated slope = 0.99 to 1.03, and estimated intercept = -1.1 to 0.1 mg/L. Differences in results by the two methods were not statistically significant.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1982 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.