Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 32: 831-834, 1986;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lequin, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Danhof, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lequin, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Danhof, M.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 32, 831-834, Copyright © 1986 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Progesterone in saliva: pitfalls and consequent implications for accuracy of the determination

RM Lequin, A van den Boogaard, J Vermeulen and M Danhof

The concentration of steroid hormones in saliva is believed to reflect the concentration of free hormone in blood. Because the assay for progesterone in saliva has not been rigorously validated, we investigated some of the analytical variables involved. Saliva samples were divided into two portions. One was centrifuged and the supernate used for extraction; the other was homogenized by sonication and used as such for extraction. Progesterone concentrations in homogenized whole saliva were double or triple those in supernates. By equilibrium dialysis we established that 85% of progesterone was in the free form in supernates but only 60 to 70% in homogenized whole saliva, depending upon the phase of the cycle of the subjects. Salivary flow was stimulated by crystals of citric acid; unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples were obtained from the same person. Progesterone concentrations were significantly (p less than 0.02) higher in stimulated samples than in unstimulated ones, particularly in samples collected during the luteal phase.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.