Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 38: 651-657, 1992;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, S. T.
Right arrow Articles by Connelly, D. P.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 38, 651-657, Copyright © 1992 by American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Certification of cholesterol measurements by the National Reference Method Laboratory Network with routine clinical specimens: effects of network laboratory bias and imprecision

ST Bennett, JH Eckfeldt, JD Belcher and DP Connelly
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, UMHC, Minneapolis.

The National Reference Method Laboratory Network has initiated a program to certify clinical laboratory cholesterol measurement performance by using routine clinical specimens. Clinical laboratory and reference laboratory measurements of split samples are used to assess whether the clinical laboratory is meeting the Laboratory Standardization Panel's goals for accuracy and precision. We used a computer-based Monte Carlo simulation model of split-sample proficiency testing to evaluate the certification program and, in particular, to analyze the effects of reference laboratory bias and imprecision. Results of our simulations indicate that the accuracy of the certification program is strongly influenced by reference laboratory bias and less influenced by reference laboratory imprecision. The certification program is potentially highly accurate, but unless reference laboratory bias is tightly controlled, the number of classification errors may limit its utility. Moreover, the decision limit of the certification program needs to be higher than the Laboratory Standardization Panel's goal (3.5% instead of 3.0%) to ensure that an acceptably high proportion of well-performing clinical laboratories can become certified.


The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 BloodHome page
S. Branford, L. Fletcher, N. C. P. Cross, M. C. Muller, A. Hochhaus, D.-W. Kim, J. P. Radich, G. Saglio, F. Pane, S. Kamel-Reid, et al.
Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials
Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3330 - 3338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Middleton
Effect of Analytical Error on the Assessment of Cardiac Risk by the High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Lipid Screening Model
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2002; 48(11): 1955 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
G. L. Myers, M. M. Kimberly, P. P. Waymack, S. J. Smith, G. R. Cooper, and E. J. Sampson
A Reference Method Laboratory Network for Cholesterol: A Model for Standardization and Improvement of Clinical Laboratory Measurements
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2000; 46(11): 1762 - 1772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
M. M. Kimberly, E. T. Leary, T. G. Cole, and P. P. Waymack
Selection, Validation, Standardization, and Performance of a Designated Comparison Method for HDL-Cholesterol for Use in the Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Network
Clin. Chem., October 1, 1999; 45(10): 1803 - 1812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.