Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 46: 1041-1050, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Price, C. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:1041-1050.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine: Supporting Decision-Making

Christopher P. Price1

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, St. Bartholomew’s and The Royal London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Turner Street, London E1 2AD, United Kingdom. Fax 44-20-7377-1544; e-mail c.p.price{at}mds.qmw.ac.uk

There is an implicit acceptance that an evidence-based culture underpins the practice of laboratory medicine, in part because it is perceived as the scientific foundation of medicine. However, several reviews of specific test procedures or technologies have shown that the evidence base is limited and in many cases flawed. One of the key deficiencies in the scientific literature on diagnostic tests often is the absence of an explicit statement of the clinical need, i.e., the clinical or operational question that the use of the test is seeking to answer. Several reviews of the literature on specific procedures have also demonstrated that the experimental methodology used is flawed with, in some cases, significant bias being introduced. Despite these limitations it is recognized that a more evidence-based approach will help in the education and training of health professionals, in the creation of a research agenda, in the production of guidelines, in the support of clinical decision-making, and in resource allocation. Furthermore, as knowledge and technologies continue to be developed, an evidence-based strategy will be critical to harnessing these developments.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
X. Bossuyt, K. Verweire, and N. Blanckaert
Laboratory Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2007; 53(10): 1730 - 1733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Rej
Clinical Chemistry through Clinical Chemistry: A Journal Timeline
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2415 - 2458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Lumbreras-Lacarra, J. M. Ramos-Rincon, and I. Hernandez-Aguado
Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Sturgeon
Practice Guidelines for Tumor Marker Use in the Clinic
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2002; 48(8): 1151 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
C. P Price
Regular review: Point of care testing
BMJ, May 26, 2001; 322(7297): 1285 - 1288.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.