|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincents University Hospital, Dublin 4, and Department of Surgery and Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the most widely used tumor markers worldwide. Its main application is mostly in gastrointestinal cancers, especially in colorectal malignancy. Although in use for almost 30 years, the clinical value of CEA in colorectal cancer is still not clear.
Methods: The literature relevant to the clinical value of CEA in colorectal cancer was reviewed. Particular attention was paid to studies involving metaanalyses and guidelines issued by Expert Panels.
Results: Although of little use in detecting early colorectal
cancer, high preoperative concentrations of CEA correlate with adverse
prognosis. Serial CEA measurements can detect recurrent colorectal
cancer with a sensitivity of
80%, a specificity of
70%, and can
provide a lead time of
5 months. CEA is the most frequent indicator
of recurrence in asymptomatic patients and currently is the most
cost-effective test for the preclinical detection of resectable
disease. CEA is most useful for the early detection of liver metastasis
in patients with diagnosed colorectal cancer. Overall, however, little
evidence is available that monitoring of all patients with diagnosed
colorectal cancer leads to enhanced patient outcome or quality of life.
Conclusions: Currently, the most useful application of CEA is in the detection of liver metastasis from colorectal cancers. Because of the relative success of surgery in resecting hepatic metastases, serial determinations of the marker are recommended for detecting cancer spread to the liver. In the future, preoperative concentrations of CEA may be included with the standard staging procedures for assessing prognosis.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): e11 - e79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Duffy and J. Crown A Personalized Approach to Cancer Treatment: How Biomarkers Can Help Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1770 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Toiyama, C. Miki, Y. Inoue, Y. Okugawa, Y. Koike, T. Yokoe, K. Tanaka, and M. Kusunoki Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 as a Prognostic Marker for Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 1617 - 1624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Korner, K. Soreide, P. J. Stokkeland, and J. A. Soreide Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum-Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 417 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wallner, A. Herbst, A. Behrens, A. Crispin, P. Stieber, B. Goke, R. Lamerz, and F. T. Kolligs Methylation of Serum DNA Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7347 - 7352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Roessler, W. Rollinger, L. Mantovani-Endl, M.-L. Hagmann, S. Palme, P. Berndt, A. M. Engel, M. Pfeffer, J. Karl, H. Bodenmuller, et al. Identification of PSME3 as a Novel Serum Tumor Marker for Colorectal Cancer by Combining Two-dimensional Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis with a Strictly Mass Spectrometry-based Approach for Data Analysis Mol. Cell. Proteomics, November 1, 2006; 5(11): 2092 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Umetani, J. Kim, S. Hiramatsu, H. A. Reber, O. J. Hines, A. J. Bilchik, and D. S. B. Hoon Increased Integrity of Free Circulating DNA in Sera of Patients with Colorectal or Periampullary Cancer: Direct Quantitative PCR for ALU Repeats. Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 1062 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Duffy Serum Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer: Are They of Clinical Value? Clin. Chem., March 1, 2006; 52(3): 345 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K S Nair, R Naidoo, and R Chetty Expression of cell adhesion molecules in oesophageal carcinoma and its prognostic value J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2005; 58(4): 343 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |