Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 6: 299-313, 1960;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Natelson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sheid, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Natelson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sheid, B.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 6, 299-313, Copyright © 1960 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

X-Ray Spectroscopy in the Clinical Laboratory

II. Chlorine and Sulfur; Automatic Analysis of Ultramicro Samples

Samuel Natelson 1 and Bertrum Sheid 1

1 Roosevelt Hospital, New York 19, N. Y. and Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, N. Y.

Chlorine and sulfur are assayed in serum with the X-ray spectrometer. The serum samples are dried in confined spots on a long strip of filter paper. The strip is passed continuously through the X-ray field and the element assayed by the peak of the curve drawn on the recorder. An attachment for the spectrometer is described for this purpose, as well as an instrument for making the confined spots. Results for chlorine in serum are compared with those obtained by mercurimetric titration. The results are comparable as regards accuracy and reproducibility. Using 20 µ1. of serum and the automatic feed, the results for chlorine indicate a reproducibility, by X-ray, of ± 3.4 per cent (2sigma).

No significant difference was observed in comparing the values for sulfur obtained by X-ray with those obtained by ashing and treatment with barium chloranilate. The X-ray technic with 25 µ1. of serum is reproducible to ± 2.2 per cent (2sigma). Serum was dialyzed against saline and assayed for sulfur content before and after dialysis. The dialyzable sulfur is small in comparison with the total protein sulfur. In comparing normal and pathologic sera with respect to their sulfur-to-protein content ratio it is observed that this varies apparently because the serum globulins contain amounts of sulfur different from serum albumin. The abnormal protein observed in multiple myeloma contains less than half the sulfur of the albumin from the same patient. This was determined by scanning the electrophoretic pattern of the serum for sulfur and protein.

It is pointed out that the X-ray technic is practical for routine analysis in the clinical laboratory in that no reagents are required for total sulfur, chlorine, calcium and potassium; furthermore, only an ultramicrosample is needed and the instrument is easily adapted to automatic operation. Results are comparable with those obtained by conventional methods with regards to accuracy and precision.

Submitted on December 6, 1959




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Rej
Clinical Chemistry through Clinical Chemistry: A Journal Timeline
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2415 - 2458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1960 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.