|
|
||||||||
Editorial |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada, and, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Fax 416-586-8628, E-mail ediamandis@mtsinai.on.ca
Nucleic acid sequencing is a fundamental technique that was
recognized with the 1980 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. The method allows
delineation of DNA sequences with extraordinary accuracy and, since its
introduction in the 1970s, has undergone many important modifications
and improvements. Among these are the achievement of long reads (up to
1000 bp per analysis), better accuracy (related to the discovery of
highly versatile and thermostable sequencing enzymes), improved
sensitivity with thermocycling protocols (linear amplifications), full
automation, higher speed (related to the introduction of thin gels),
and substitution of radioactivity with fluorescent and other probes.
All of these improvements have allowed scientists to attempt something
that was unthinkable 1520 years ago, i.e., delineation of the
complete sequence of the human genome (
3 x
109 bp) and genomes of other organisms. We have
already witnessed, over the last few years, the release of the complete
sequence of simple organisms as well as of more complex ones, the
latest being the Drosophila genome (1). We are
now very close to the completion of the entire Human Genome Project
(2). These achievements represent a triumph of the DNA
sequencing methodology.
Now that we (almost) know the complete DNA sequences of these organisms
and humans, the question arises. How are we to use this
information? The next step will be the complete annotation of
the human genome, which will include classification of the raw DNA
sequence into well-defined gene structures. We will then need to
predict and experimentally verify the encoded proteins and their
possible biological functions (physiology). Once this is done, we can
begin to ask questions about how genomic variation in certain genes
(polymorphisms, mutations) can cause or predispose to specific human
diseases (pathophysiology). We already have many examples of subtle
genetic changes that can cause very
References
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
J Peltonen, J A Welsh, and K H Vahakangas Is there a role for PCR-SSCP among the methods for missense mutation detection of TP53 gene? Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 2007; 26(1): 9 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kohara, H. Noda, K. Okano, and H. Kambara DNA probes on beads arrayed in a capillary, 'Bead-array', exhibited high hybridization performance Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2002; 30(16): e87 - e87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D J Bowen Haemophilia A and haemophilia B: molecular insights Mol. Pathol., April 1, 2002; 55(2): 127 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D J Bowen Haemophilia A and haemophilia B: molecular insights Mol. Pathol., February 1, 2002; 55(1): 1 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Norberg, S. Klaar, L. Lindqvist, T. Lindahl, J. Ahlgren, and J. Bergh Enzymatic Mutation Detection Method Evaluated for Detection of p53 Mutations in cDNA from Breast Cancers Clin. Chem., May 1, 2001; 47(5): 821 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |