Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 46: 1717-1719, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ermens, A. A.M.
Right arrow Articles by van Duijnhoven, H. L.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ermens, A. A.M.
Right arrow Articles by van Duijnhoven, H. L.P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:1717-1719.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters

Evaluation of a Simple Dot-Blot Method for the Detection of Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies Directed against Proteinase 3 and Myeloperoxidase

Anthony A.M. Ermens1,a, Angelique J.M. Bayens1, Adriënne Crooymans1, Anita A.M. Broekman-van Hout2 and Hans L.P. van Duijnhoven2

1 Klinisch Laboratorium, Diaconessenhuis, Postbus 90052, 5600 PD Eindhoven, The Netherlands

2 Algemeen Klinisch Laboratorium, Elkerliek Ziekenhuis, 5800 AB Helmond, The Netherlands
a Author for correspondence. Fax 31-40-2335595; e-mail termens@iae.nl.


To the Editor:

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) usually are demonstrated by indirect immunofluorescence (IF), followed by examination of patient samples for the antibodies against proteinase-3 (PR3) and myeloperoxidase (MPO). The antibody testing usually requires ELISA and may be hampered by the cost and the requirement for an ELISA reader. Dot-blot (DB) analysis can be an attractive alternative for ELISA for the identification of some autoantibodies (1)(2).

In this study, we compared a capture ELISA for PR3 and MPO antibodies with a new, commercially available DB method. Sera from 74 patients were selected for the evaluation. In addition, samples with negative IF results (n = 40); samples with cytoplasmic (c)-ANCAs (n = 20), perinuclear (p)-ANCAs (n = 8), or atypical IF (n = 4) results; and samples with equivocal IF results (n = 4) were included.

Routine detection of antibodies . . . [Full Text of this Article]


References







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.