HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (33) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Müller, M. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Müller, M. M. Related Collections Laboratory Management

Implementation of Reference Systems in Laboratory Medicine

Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Kaiser Franz Joseph Hospital, Kundratstrasse 3, A-1100 Vienna, Austria, Fax 43-1-60191-3309, E-mail mathias.mueller@kfj.magwien.gv.at

	Introduction

 
In laboratory medicine, meaningful measurements are essential for the diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment, and follow-up of patients; therefore, methods applied in diagnostic measurements must be accurate, precise, specific, and comparable among laboratories (1). A given analytical measurement has only one true result, and the reliability of a measurement lies both in the result obtained and in the performance of a well-defined measurement procedure. Inadequate or incorrect analytical performance has consequences for the patient, the clinician, and the healthcare system. Poor-quality laboratory results may lead to incorrect interpretation by the physician, to a wrong diagnosis, and hence to treatment that impairs, or at least does not help, the patient’s situation.

Measurement procedures in laboratory medicine should not be based on consensus but must follow the established rules of metrology as outlined in the International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (VIM) (2). According to VIM, metrology includes all aspects of measurements in whatever fields of science or technology they occur. One key element of metrology is the traceability of a test result to the International System (SI), which ensures comparable results for different measurements of the same analyte in the same sample. "Traceability" is defined as the property of the result related to national or international standards through an unbroken chain of comparisons, each of which has stated uncertainties (2). The importance of these metrologic principles is described in an International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/European Committee for Standardization (CEN) standard (3). These rules must be followed if results of diagnostic measurements are to be comparable and true wherever in the world they are performed. Given the increased mobility of patients, comparable (true) test results are essential for a rational and cost-effective diagnostic approach. To reach these goals, international and regional organizations . . . [Full Text of this Article]

	References

 

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				C. Pritchard, M. Quaglia, C. Mussell, W. I. Burkitt, H. Parkes, and G. O'Connor Fully Traceable Absolute Protein Quantification of Somatropin That Allows Independent Comparison of Somatropin Standards Clin. Chem., November 1, 2009; 55(11): 1984 - 1990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Sturgeon, P. Berger, J.-M. Bidart, S. Birken, C. Burns, R. J. Norman, U.-H. Stenman, and on behalf of the IFCC Working Group on hCG Differences in Recognition of the 1st WHO International Reference Reagents for hCG-Related Isoforms by Diagnostic Immunoassays for Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Clin. Chem., August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1484 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Ceriotti, R. Hinzmann, and M. Panteghini Reference intervals: the way forward Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 8 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Kahn and V. Fonseca Translating the A1C Assay Diabetes Care, August 1, 2008; 31(8): 1704 - 1707. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Cattozzo, E. Guerra, F. Ceriotti, C. Franzini, and on behalf of the Enzyme Working Group of the Itali Commutable Calibrator with Value Assigned by the IFCC Reference Procedure to Harmonize Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Results Measured by 2 Different Methods Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1349 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Weykamp, W G. John, A. Mosca, T. Hoshino, R. Little, J.-O. Jeppsson, I. Goodall, K. Miedema, G. Myers, H. Reinauer, et al. The IFCC Reference Measurement System for HbA1c: A 6-Year Progress Report Clin. Chem., February 1, 2008; 54(2): 240 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Donadio, A. Pascual, J. H.H. Thijssen, and C. Ronin Feasibility Study of New Calibrators for Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Immunoprocedures Based on Remodeling of Recombinant TSH to Mimic Glycoforms Circulating in Patients with Thyroid Disorders Clin. Chem., February 1, 2006; 52(2): 286 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Singh, S. K. Grebe, B. Yue, A. L. Rockwood, J. C. Cramer, Z. Gombos, G. Eisenhofer, and S. Binder Precisely Wrong? Urinary Fractionated Metanephrines and Peer-Based Laboratory Proficiency Testing * A representative for Bio-Rad responds: Clin. Chem., February 1, 2005; 51(2): 472 - 474. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Bristow, P. Berger, J.-M. Bidart, S. Birken, R. Norman, U.-H. Stenman, C. Sturgeon, and on behalf of the IFCC Working Group on hCG Establishment, Value Assignment, and Characterization of New WHO Reference Reagents for Six Molecular Forms of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 177 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Chiesa, A. Panero, J. F. Osborn, A. F. Simonetti, and L. Pacifico Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: A Clinical and Laboratory Challenge Clin. Chem., February 1, 2004; 50(2): 279 - 287. [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Hoelzel, C. Weykamp, J.-O. Jeppsson, K. Miedema, J. R. Barr, I. Goodall, T. Hoshino, W. G. John, U. Kobold, R. Little, et al. IFCC Reference System for Measurement of Hemoglobin A1c in Human Blood and the National Standardization Schemes in the United States, Japan, and Sweden: A Method-Comparison Study Clin. Chem., January 1, 2004; 50(1): 166 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Fierens, D. Stockl, D. Baetens, A. P. De Leenheer, and L. M. Thienpont Standardization of C-Peptide Measurements in Urine by Method Comparison with Isotope-Dilution Mass Spectrometry Clin. Chem., June 1, 2003; 49(6): 992 - 994. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Baadenhuijsen, H. Steigstra, C. Cobbaert, A. Kuypers, C. Weykamp, and R. Jansen Commutability Assessment of Potential Reference Materials Using a Multicenter Split-Patient-Sample Between-Field-Methods (Twin-Study) Design: Study within the Framework of the Dutch Project "Calibration 2000" Clin. Chem., September 1, 2002; 48(9): 1520 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Lequin and U.-H. Stenman Standardization: Comparability and Traceability of Laboratory Results Dr. Stenman responds: Clin. Chem., February 1, 2002; 48(2): 391 - 393. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Cattozzo, C. Franzini, and G. Melzi d'Eril Commutability of Calibration and Control Materials for Serum Lipase Clin. Chem., December 1, 2001; 47(12): 2108 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Rej and C. S. Norton-Wenzel Target Values and Method Evaluation in Proficiency Testing Programs Clin. Chem., December 1, 2001; 47(12): 2185 - 2186. [Full Text] [PDF]