|
|
||||||||
Editorial |
1 Renal Diagnostics and Therapeutics Unit, and
2 Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases, National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892
3 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Warren Magnusen Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Medicine, NIH, Bldg. 10, Room 2C-407, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892-1508. Fax 301-402-1885; e-mail ghortin@cc.nih.gov.
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
There is ominous growth in chronic kidney disease among the US population, primarily related to type 2 diabetes (1). The current number of patients on dialysis (
300 000) is growing steadily as the prevalence of end-stage kidney disease grows geometrically with a doubling time of 10 years. The epidemic growth in diabetes, the leading cause of chronic kidney disease, portends continuation of this trend (2). Most patients with end-stage kidney disease will end up on dialysis because the supply of kidneys for transplants is limited to
13 000 per year. A further warning sign from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey is that an estimated 8 million Americans have a
50% reduction of their glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (3). This group with impaired kidney function is at risk for progression to end-stage kidney disease as well as for development of cardiovascular disease.
One source of hope for stemming the dire trends in kidney disease is progress in the treatment of impaired kidney function, if it is detected and treated early (1)(2). A recent initiative, termed the National Kidney Disease Education Program, seeks to increase public awareness for preventive therapy. Increased awareness will create new demands on laboratories for early and more sensitive detection of kidney disease and for identification of new laboratory markers, such as one evaluated in this issue of the Journal (4). With the recent development of new genomic and proteomic approaches, there is also the potential for identification of many new markers requiring evaluation.
The laboratory marker that has long served as the mainstay for detecting impaired kidney function is serum creatinine. Unfortunately, serum creatinine is an insensitive marker of kidney injury. Two factors
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
U. Poge, T. Gerhardt, A. Bokenkamp, B. Stoffel-Wagner, H.-U. Klehr, T. Sauerbruch, and R. P. Woitas Time course of low molecular weight proteins in the early kidney transplantation period--influence of corticosteroids Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2858 - 2863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Hewitt, J. Dear, and R. A. Star Discovery of Protein Biomarkers for Renal Diseases J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1677 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Mehta and G. M. Chertow Acute Renal Failure Definitions and Classification: Time for Change? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 2178 - 2187. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Jayagopal, B. G. Keevil, S. L. Atkin, P. E. Jennings, and E. S. Kilpatrick Paradoxical Changes in Cystatin C and Serum Creatinine in Patients with Hypo- and Hyperthyroidism Clin. Chem., April 1, 2003; 49(4): 680 - 681. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |