Clinical Chemistry Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 535-536, 2003; 10.1373/49.4.535
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stenman, U.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stenman, U.-H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:535-536.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Standardization as a Private Enterprise

Ulf-Håkan Stenman

Department of Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Hospital, Biomedicum Room 424, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland, E-mail ulf-hakan.stenman@hus.fi

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Standardization of analytical methods in clinical chemistry is important because it facilitates interpretation of laboratory results. Many chemical determinations are now well standardized, but this is less common with immunoassays. Standardization requires availability of a primary standard and a reference method. Although standards are available for most clinically important analytes, reference methods for immunoassays are available only for haptens (1). The study of Haese et al. (2) in this issue aims at standardization of assays for human kallikrein 2 (hK2); it highlights many of the problems associated with standardization of sensitive immunoassays and with the use of recombinant proteins as standards.

hK2 is a potentially important marker for prostate cancer, the most promising application being evaluation of tumor aggressiveness. Most prostate cancers grow slowly, with average tumor-doubling time being 2–4 years, but some tumors grow aggressively. Moreover, it is important to know whether a slightly increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value is caused by benign prostatic disease or by a cancer and, if so, whether this cancer needs to be cured. On the tissue level, PSA expression decreases with increasing tumor grade (and aggressiveness), whereas hK2 expression is constant or less affected (3). Several . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.