HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moons, K. G.M. Articles by Grobbee, D. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moons, K. G.M. Articles by Grobbee, D. E. Related Collections General Clinical Chemistry Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization

Test Research versus Diagnostic Research

¹ Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

^aAddress correspondence to this author at: Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. Fax 31-30-2505485; e-mail K.G.M.Moons@jc.azu.nl.

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

	Introduction

 
The diagnostic workup starts with a patient presenting with symptoms or signs suggestive of a particular disease. The workup is commonly a consecutive process starting with medical history and physical examination and simple tests followed by more burdensome and costly diagnostic procedures. Generally, after each test all available results are converted (often implicitly) to a probability of disease, which in turn directs decisions for additional testing or initiation of appropriate treatment. Setting a diagnosis is a multitest or multivariable process of estimating and updating the diagnostic probability of disease presence given combinations of test results. Each test may be more or less burdensome to the patient, time-consuming, and/or costly. Different tests often provide to various degrees the same information because they are all associated with the same underlying disorder. Relevant for physicians is to know which tests are redundant and which have true, independent predictive value for the presence or absence of the target disease. Accordingly, studies of diagnostic accuracy should demonstrate which (subsequent) test results truly increase or decrease the probability of disease presence as estimated from the previous results, and to what extent.

Various reviews have demonstrated that the majority of published studies of diagnostic accuracy still have methodologic flaws in design or analysis or provide results with limited practical applicability (1)(2)(3). This has been attributed to the absence of a proper methodologic framework for diagnostic test evaluations as, for example, exists for studies of therapies and etiologic factors and has motivated various researchers to establish frameworks for studies of diagnostic accuracy, such as the recent STARD Initiative (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). In our view, an issue that has received too little attention in most of these . . . [Full Text of this Article]

	Why Does Test Research Have Limited Relevance to Practice?

 
study question and object of study
test characteristics are not fixed
selection bias

	Proposed Approach for Diagnostic Accuracy Research

 

	Clinical Examples

 

	Is There a Place for Test Research?

 

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				X. Bossuyt, K. Verweire, and N. Blanckaert Laboratory Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities Clin. Chem., October 1, 2007; 53(10): 1730 - 1733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Suarthana, K. G M Moons, D. Heederik, and E. Meijer A simple diagnostic model for ruling out pneumoconiosis among construction workers Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2007; 64(9): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. van Zaane, A. P. Nierich, W. F. Buhre, G. J. Brandon Bravo Bruinsma, and K. G. M. Moons Resolving the blind spot of transoesophageal echocardiography: a new diagnostic device for visualizing the ascending aorta in cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2007; 98(4): 434 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. G.M. Moons Questionnaire to Distinguish between Stress and Urge Urinary Incontinence Ann Intern Med, December 19, 2006; 145(12): 934 - 935. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S Moskowitz and M. S Pepe Comparing the predictive values of diagnostic tests: sample size and analysis for paired study designs Clinical Trials, June 1, 2006; 3(3): 272 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. H Rutten, K. G M Moons, and A. W Hoes Improving the quality and clinical relevance of diagnostic studies. BMJ, May 13, 2006; 332(7550): 1129 - 1129. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M Bossuyt, L. Irwig, J. Craig, and P. Glasziou Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways. BMJ, May 6, 2006; 332(7549): 1089 - 1092. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Whiting, R. Harbord, C. Main, J. J Deeks, G. Filippini, M. Egger, and J. A C Sterne Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic review BMJ, April 15, 2006; 332(7546): 875 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. H Rutten, K. G M Moons, M.-J. M Cramer, D. E Grobbee, N. P A Zuithoff, J.-W. J Lammers, and A. W Hoes Recognising heart failure in elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: cross sectional diagnostic study BMJ, December 10, 2005; 331(7529): 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Puhan, J. Steurer, L. M. Bachmann, and G. t. Riet A Randomized Trial of Ways To Describe Test Accuracy: The Effect on Physicians' Post-Test Probability Estimates Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 184 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Oudega, A. W. Hoes, and K. G.M. Moons The Wells Rule Does Not Adequately Rule Out Deep Venous Thrombosis in Primary Care Patients Ann Intern Med, July 19, 2005; 143(2): 100 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. de Jonge, R. Brouwer, M. Smit, M. de Frankrijker-Merkestijn, R. J. E. M. Dolhain, J. M. W. Hazes, A. W. van Toorenenbergen, and J. Lindemans Automated counting of white blood cells in synovial fluid: reply Rheumatology, September 1, 2004; 43(9): 1201 - 1202. [Full Text] [PDF]