Clinical Chemistry Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 254-256, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.038844
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salvadori, B.
Right arrow Articles by Orlando, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salvadori, B.
Right arrow Articles by Orlando, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:254-256.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Comparison of Pre- and Postsurgical Concentrations of Blood HER-2 mRNA and HER-2 Extracellular Domain Reflects HER-2 Status in Early Breast Cancer

Benedetta Salvadori1, Pamela Pinzani1, Vito Distante3, Donato Casella3, Simonetta Bianchi2, Milena Paglierani2, Vania Vezzosi2, Rainer Neumann4, Luigi Cataliotti3, Mario Pazzagli1 and Claudio Orlando1,a

1 Clinical Biochemistry Unit, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, 2 Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, and 3 Department of Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 4 Medical Department, Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini 6, 50139 Florence, Italy; fax 39-055-4271413, e-mail c.orlando@dfc.unifi.it

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The HER-2 gene (HER-2/neu or c-erbB-2) encodes an 185-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein that is a member of the type I family of growth factor receptors. HER-2 is constitutively activated by overexpression and contributes to cell growth, angiogenesis, survival, and metastasis (1). The assessment of HER-2 status in breast carcinomas provides valuable prognostic and predictive information. Immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal in situ hybridization, and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) may be used for this purpose. Other approaches have been proposed for the assessment of HER-2 status in peripheral blood, including evaluating either circulating HER-2 extracellular domain (ECD) or nucleated cell-associated HER-2 mRNA. Some studies have indicated that circulating ECD/HER-2 is frequently increased in metastatic disease (2)(3)(4). In addition, high concentrations of ECD/HER-2 are associated with cancer aggressiveness (5) and predict response to trastuzumab (6)(7)(8) and antiestrogen (4) therapies in advanced breast cancer. Recently, Martin et al. (9), using an array to assess circulating mRNA, pointed out that HER-2 mRNA was generally low in the blood of healthy individuals but was increased in 31% of patients with untreated invasive breast cancer. Almost all of these studies evaluated blood markers in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer using a single presurgical sample.

Our study included 40 consecutive patients (median age, 58 years; range, 29–80 years) undergoing surgery for early breast cancer. Patients did not receive any systemic therapy before surgery and provided informed consent for the study. According to tumor size, 28 patients were classified as T1, whereas the remaining 12 were T2 or T3. Twenty-two were node negative, and 35 were positive for estrogen receptors. From each patient, we collected 12 mL of venous blood in EDTA tubes and divided the . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.