Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 1284-1287, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.048348
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Le Calvez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hainaut, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Le Calvez, F.
Right arrow Articles by Hainaut, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1284-1287.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Arrayed Primer Extension Resequencing of Mutations in the TP53 Tumor Suppressor Gene: Comparison with Denaturing HPLC and Direct Sequencing

Florence Le Calvez1, Aune Ahman2, Neeme Tonisson2,3, Jeremy Lambert1, Stéphane Temam4, Paul Brennan1, David G. Zaridze5, Andres Metspalu2,3 and Pierre Hainaut1,a

1 International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France;2 Asper Biotech Ltd., Tartu, Estonia;3 Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu/Estonian Biocentre, Tartu, Estonia;4 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France;5 Institute of Carcinogenesis, Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150, Cours Albert Thomas, F-69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France; fax 33472738322, e-mail hainaut@iarc.fr

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Mutations of TP53 (17p13.1; OMIM 191170; PubMed accession number X54156) are common in cancers and are typically missense within exons 4–9, impairing the capacity of p53 to transactivate genes involved in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair (1). Functionally, mutations may differ according to their nature and position, as well as to the presence of a common polymorphism at codon 72 (arginine or a proline) in the mutant allele (2). Knowing TP53 mutation status has potential applications for cancer prognosis (3)(4) and early diagnosis (5), identification of mutagen "fingerprints" (1)(6), and prediction of therapeutic outcomes (7)(8). To achieve this purpose, sensitive, fast, and cost-effective methods are needed to assess the whole coding sequence plus exon/intron boundaries. Current approaches are based on mutation prescreening with single strand conformational polymorphism analysis, temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis, or denaturing HPLC (DHPLC) combined with direct sequencing of relevant PCR fragments [reviewed in Ref. (9)]. These methods are labor-intensive, difficult to standardize, and in some cases, of limited sensitivity. In recent years, 2 microarray methods for resequencing TP53 have been described: the Affymetrix p53 GeneChip array, described elsewhere (10)(11), and the Arrayed Primer Extension (APEX), based on incorporation of 4 dye terminators into oligonucleotide primers that each identify a base in the target sequence (12). In 2002, we described an APEX array for resequencing TP53 exons 2–9, which contain 95% of known mutations in TP53 (13). Here we compare the sensitivity and detection limits of APEX with a standard method, DHPLC/direct sequencing, and discuss the potential of APEX for application to cancer diagnostic or prognostic purposes.

Specimens in the comparison set included 6 cell lines . . . [Full Text of this Article]




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Gormally, P. Vineis, G. Matullo, F. Veglia, E. Caboux, E. Le Roux, M. Peluso, S. Garte, S. Guarrera, A. Munnia, et al.
TP53 and KRAS2 Mutations in Plasma DNA of Healthy Subjects and Subsequent Cancer Occurrence: A Prospective Study.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6871 - 6876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.