Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 1333-1334, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.053686
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Master, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Master, S. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1333-1334.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Diagnostic Proteomics: Back to Basics?

Stephen R. Master

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 7.103 Founders, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, E-mail srmaster@mail.med.upenn.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The recent emergence of methods for rapidly profiling large numbers of protein markers by use of mass spectrometry (MS) has raised hopes for the rapid identification of novel cancer biomarkers (1). In particular, MS-based assays using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) have been used to compare serum proteomic patterns from healthy and diseased individuals in hopes of finding diagnostic signatures that can be adapted for use in the clinical laboratory. Early investigations in ovarian cancer patients suggested that panels of anonymous markers might substantially advance our current diagnostic capabilities (2)(3), although subsequent criticism has been directed at the primary data from these studies (4)(5) as well as at the SELDI time-of-flight (TOF) profiling approach itself (6)(7) [for summaries of this ongoing controversy, see Refs. (8)(9)]. Specific questions have been raised regarding the reproducibility of SELDI-TOF spectra, possible changes in protocols or inadequate calibration, and the ability of SELDI to detect low-abundance tumor markers. Additionally, observations that spectra can vary based on analytical factors such as the time of processing have been noted during large profiling experiments (10).

Several of these issues have recently been addressed through the combined efforts of investigators in the National Cancer Institute–sponsored Early Detection Research Network (EDRN). This group has undertaken a systematic assessment of the interlaboratory reproducibility of SELDI-TOF measurements along with their potential applicability to prostate cancer diagnosis. Their initial results demonstrated that relevant portions of SELDI-TOF profiles can be measured reproducibly and used to distinguish a reference set of prostate cancer cases from controls (11). This study was an encouraging step toward defining the analytical reproducibility of serum proteome profiling, although it highlighted the need . . . [Full Text of this Article]




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Brulliard, D. Lorphelin, O. Collignon, W. Lorphelin, B. Thouvenot, E. Gothie, S. Jacquenet, V. Ogier, O. Roitel, J.-M. Monnez, et al.
Nonrandom variations in human cancer ESTs indicate that mRNA heterogeneity increases during carcinogenesis
PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7522 - 7527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. G.W. Norden, P. Rodriguez-Cutillas, and R. J. Unwin
Clinical Urinary Peptidomics: Learning to Walk Before We Can Run
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2007; 53(3): 375 - 376.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. L. Hortin, S. A. Jortani, J. C. Ritchie Jr, R. Valdes Jr, and D. W. Chan
Proteomics: A New Diagnostic Frontier
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2006; 52(7): 1218 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. P. Diamandis
Serum Proteomic Profiling by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis: Next Steps
Cancer Res., June 1, 2006; 66(11): 5540 - 5541.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. P. Diamandis
Validation of breast cancer biomarkers identified by mass spectrometry.
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2006; 52(4): 771 - 772.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.