|
|
||||||||
Opinion |
Cattedra di Biochimica Clinica e Biologia Molecolare Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche "Luigi Sacco", Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia - Polo di Vialba, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy, Fax 39-02-3564018, E-mail mauro.panteghini@unimi.it
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The contribution of laboratory medicine to clinical cardiology has grown in importance over the years. Highly sensitive and specific biomarkers for the detection of myocardial damage, such as cardiac troponins, as well as assays for reliable markers of myocardial function, such as cardiac natriuretic peptides, are now available, assigning to the laboratory a pivotal role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with cardiac disease (1). This has been evidenced by the incorporation of these markers into new international guidelines (2)(3)(4). Among those, one of the most important documents outlines the recommendations for a new definition of myocardial infarction (MI), published by the joint European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology committee (2). This consensus document has based the MI definition on biochemical grounds, a choice guided by the advent of cardiac troponins, biomarkers that provide higher sensitivity for smaller myocardial injury and virtually total specificity for cardiac damage (5). It is therefore important that these clinically relevant biomarkers, on which critical decisions will rest, are measured with highly reliable and standardized methods to achieve comparability of results, independent of the measurement test reagents and platforms as well as the laboratory where the procedure is carried out (6). Interchangeability of results over time and location would contribute considerably to improvements in healthcare because results of clinical studies undertaken in different locations or at different times could be universally applied. This would allow effective application of evidence-based medicine, as guidelines established by scientific or professional bodies often advocate use of specific decision limits for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention (3).
Because of an international patent, cardiac troponin T assays from only a single diagnostic manufacturer are commercially available, so that comparability of results for
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C.M. Cobbaert, C.W. Weykamp, E.C.H.J. Michielsen, H. Baadenhuijsen, and M.P. van Dieijen-Visser Time-Dependent Instability of Cardiac Troponins in Human Plasma Spiked with NIST Reference Material 2921 Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): 2078 - 2079. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
NACB Writing Group Members, F. S. Apple, R. L. Jesse, L. K. Newby, A. H.B. Wu, and R. H. Christenson National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and IFCC Committee for Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Analytical Issues for Biochemical Markers of Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): e352 - e355. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, F. S. Apple, R. L. Jesse, L. K. Newby, A. H.B. Wu, R. H. Christenson, NACB COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. H. Christenson, F. S. Apple, C. P. Cannon, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry and IFCC Committee for Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Analytical Issues for Biochemical Markers of Acute Coronary Syndromes Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 547 - 551. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Vasan Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Basis and Practical Considerations Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2335 - 2362. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Miller, G. L. Myers, and R. Rej Why commutability matters. Clin. Chem., April 1, 2006; 52(4): 553 - 554. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |