Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 52: 915-916, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.068551
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Current Issues in Laboratory Medicine
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:915-916.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Editorials

Improving Training in Laboratory Medicine

Mitchell G. Scott1,a and David E. Bruns2

1 Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
2 University of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Fax 314-362-1461; e-mail mscott@labmed.wustl.edu.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

In this issue of Clinical Chemistry, we publish a proposal for curriculum content of residency training in laboratory medicine and for evaluation of resident competency (1). The proposal was developed by the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists (ACLPS) and covers residency training in all areas of laboratory medicine. Why have we chosen to publish this curriculum? Why did we publish the entire document, rather than just the portion related to clinical chemistry? Why is the curriculum important to the readers of Clinical Chemistry—particularly PhD and MD laboratory directors?

In a broad sense, the first reason for publishing the document is that it represents a comprehensive, well-written template for curriculum content for training of residents in laboratory medicine. Because Clinical Chemistry is a leading journal in laboratory medicine, we know that many of those individuals who are responsible for training pathology residents are among our readers and are members of AACC, which publishes the journal.

Now is an important time to address the curriculum of residency programs. As the authors of the curriculum document clearly state in their introduction, the field of laboratory medicine and training in pathology have changed dramatically since the last consensus recommendations were published in 1995 (2). At that time, routine molecular diagnostics was just beginning, the clinical use of pharmacogenomics was only being hinted at, "proteomics" consisted of 2-dimensional gels and serum protein electrophoresis, point-of-care testing was primarily portable glucose meters, and electronic medical records existed only in the VA system. Simultaneous to this explosion of knowledge and technology, the length of residency training in pathology was decreased by 1 year for both combined anatomic . . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.