Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 3-4, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.080218
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rinder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rinder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, B. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Other Areas of Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Current Issues in Laboratory Medicine
Right arrow Informatics and Statistics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:3-4.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Evolving Paradigms of Clinical Pathology Resident Education and Consultation

Henry Rinder and Brian R. Smitha

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St., Fitkin 617, P.O. Box 208035, New Haven, CT 06520-8035. Fax 203-688-4111; brian.smith@yale.edu.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

In the complex arena of medical resident education, real-time tools have become increasingly valuable for documenting medical knowledge and practice-based learning, as well as providing, in some cases, training exercises in and of themselves (1)(2)(3)(4). For clinical pathology in particular, the myriad of consultative activities of the laboratory medicine resident have always been a difficult area for documentation since these consultations are not routinely included in the patient chart in most institutions. Moreover, this lack of a common venue for documentation of direct patient care activities in clinical pathology limits appropriate dissemination of this information among pathology (and other) house staff and similarly can limit "institutional memory" of important clinical principles and facts, especially those that may be quite specific to the particular institution.

Residents in clinical pathology rotations should develop and document the ability to handle laboratory methodology issues while carrying out broader clinical diagnostic consultations (5). Clinical pathology residents participate in, and may even direct, therapeutic decisions based on the combination of laboratory and clinical evidence, furthering their own education and the care of those patients . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.