Clinical Chemistry 43: 251-253, 1997;
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;43:251-253.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.
Optical Tweezers and Immunoassay
Larry J. Kricka
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, fax 215-662-7529, e-mail larry kricka{at}path1a.med.upenn.edu
Our scientific ancestors who advanced the atomic and molecular
theories of matter and the cellular basis of biological organisms would
be astounded by our current ability to visualize and manipulate atoms,
molecules, and cells. The new techniques of atomic force microscopy
(AFM; or scanning force microscopy) (1)(2)(3)(4) and optical
trapping (optical or laser tweezers) (5)(6)
have allowed us to locate individual atoms and molecules on surfaces
and to manipulate cells directly. In this issue Helmerson et al.
(7) report one of the first studies that uses laser
tweezers to detect the binding of an antigen to an immobilized antibody
and applies this technique in a competitive immunoassay to determine
antigen concentration.
In immunoassay, attempts to detect individual or a few antigen or
antibody molecules have relied on labeling one component of the
reaction with a high-specific-activity label or a label that can
participate in an amplification reaction (e.g., enzymes, DNA)
(8). Now the presence of a component of a ligand:binder
pair can be sensed directly by using the laser-based technique of
optical tweezers.
The principle of optical tweezers (optical trapping) is the use of
radiation pressure from light incident on an object. This pressure
arises from the transfer of photon momentum when light is reflected or
scattered by the object (6). Nd:YAG lasers (neodymium in
yttrium aluminum garnet crystals) commonly used as the light source
operate in the infrared (1.06 µm), and power as great as 150 mW can
be used with objects such as cells without causing serious damage.
Various trapping schemes are possible. Objects floating in a medium can
be transported in the direction of propagation of a parallel laser
beam, and objects in transit along the first beam can be selected and
removed by a second laser beam that intersects the first beam at 90°
(transport trapping). In optical tweezer trapping, a lens of high
numerical aperture focuses a laser beam; the resulting gradient force
can trap objects near the focus of the lens. By making the light
incident on the object at large angles, the transfer of momentum from
the refracted light is great enough to trap the object at the
focal point. A third trapping scheme, levitation trapping, traps
objects by means of two counter-propagating laser beams. One laser beam
transports objects to the focus of a second laser beam, and the objects
become trapped at the focal point.
Optical tweezers can be used in an elegant immunoassay strategy, as
described in this issue (7). Various concentrations of
bovine serum albumin (BSA) were covalently coupled to 4.5-µm-diameter
latex beads ("microspheres") that were then dispensed onto the
surface of a glass cover slip coated with mouse monoclonal anti-BSA
antibodies. BSA immobilized on the beads bound specifically to anti-BSA
antibodies on the surface of the cover slip. Next, using a microscope,
Helmerson et al. selected a bead and then focused the laser tweezers
onto the bead. The bead serves as a "handle" for the optical
tweezers to grab. The laser power was increased until the bead was seen
to jump away from the surface, indicating that the antibody-binding
force had been overcome. The power required to free the bead was found
to be directly related to the concentration of BSA on the bead
(detection limit 1.45 x 10-12 mol/L). Helmerson et
al. applied this principle to a competitive immunoassay for BSA in
which free BSA competed with BSA immobilized on a latex bead for a
fixed concentration of antibody immobilized on the surface of a glass
cover slip; after a 2-h incubation, BSA could be detected in the range
1.45 x 10-12 to 1.45 x 10-15
mol/L.
Optical tweezers are just one example of the new wave of analytical
techniques finding application in the biological and analytical
sciences. Another technique that can detect single antigenantibody
recognition events is AFM, invented in 1986 (9). In this
technique a surface of interest is moved past a very small tip (10 nm
in diameter, microfabricated from silicon or silicon nitride) attached
to a flexible cantilever. Bending of the cantilever as the tip rises
and falls in response to the topology of the surface is registered with
a laser beam. Moreover, the tip can be coated with specific molecules
to provide direct molecular recognition of substances on a surface. For
example, anti-human serum albumin antibody immobilized via a flexible
spacer on the tip of an AFM microscope has been used to sense the
unbinding of the individual Fab fragments to albumin on a surface; the
force of this binding was estimated at 244 pN (10).
Sensitized AFM tips have also been used to image functional groups on
surfaces, a technique termed chemical force microscopy
(11). AFM and its variants have also proved useful in the
study of cells and in surface mapping. Some recent applications of AFM
and optical tweezers (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37) are listed in Table 1
.
The future role of such techniques as optical tweezers and AFM in
quantitative analysis has not been firmly established. Issues of
sensitivity, reliability, throughput, and cost effectiveness have yet
to be answered. Nevertheless, the ability to manipulate molecules of
biological interest and individual cells (e.g., to select specific
cells for PCR analysis (38)) is an important development
that will inevitably have a major impact on both research and routine
clinical laboratory medicine.
References
-
Firtel M, Beveridge TJ. Scanning probe microscopy in microbiology. Micron 1995;26:347-362.
-
Shao Z, Yang J. Progress in high resolution atomic force microscopy in biology. Q Rev Biophys 1995;28:195-251.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yang J, Shao Z. Recent advances in biological atomic force microscopy. Micron 1995;26:35-49.
-
Roberts CJ, Williams PM, Davies MC, Jackson DE, Tendler SJ. Atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy: refining techniques for studying biomolecules. Trends Biotechnol 1994;12:127-132.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stevenson R. Innovation '92. Optical trapping explodes. Am Biotechnol Lab 1993;11:4-6.
-
Uchida M, Sato-Maeda M, Tashiro H. Micromanipulation: whole-cell manipulation by optical trapping. Curr Biol 1995;5:380-382.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Helmerson K, Kishore R, Phillips WD, Weetall HH. Optical
tweezers-based immunosensor detects femtomolar concentrations of
antigens. Clin Chem 1997;43:379-83..
-
Kricka LJ. Selected strategies for improving sensitivity and reliability of immunoassays [Review]. Clin Chem 1994;40:347-357.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sarid D. Scanning force microscopy 1991:243p Oxford University Press New York. .
-
Hinterdorfer P, Baumgartner W, Gruber HJ, Schilcher K, Schindler H. Detection and localization of individual antibodyantigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:3477-3481.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Frisbie CD, Rozsnyai LF, Noy A, Wrighton MS, Lieber CM. Functional group imaging by chemical force microscopy. Science 1994;265:2071-2074.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vorobjev IA, Liang H, Wright WH, Berns MW. Optical trapping for chromosome manipulation: a wavelength dependence of induced chromosome bridges. Biophys J 1993;64:533-538.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liang H, Wright WH, Cheng S, He W, Berns MW. Micromanipulation of chromosomes in PTK2 cells using laser microsurgery (optical scalpel) in combination with laser-induced optical force (optical tweezers). Exp Cell Res 1993;204:110-120.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Conia J, Voelkel S. Optical manipulations of human gametes. BioTechniques 1994;17:1162-1165.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Aufderheide KJ, Du Q, Fry ES. Directed positioning of micronuclei in Paramecium tetraurelia with laser tweezers: absence of detect- able damage after manipulation. J Eukar Microbiol 1993;40:793-796.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Smith SB, Cui Y, Bustamante C. Overstretching B-DNA. The elastic response of individual double-stranded and single-stranded DNA molecules. Science 1996;271:795-799.
[Abstract]
-
Kurachi M, Hoshi M, Tashiro H. Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. Cell Motil Cytoskel 1995;30:221-228.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Miyata H, Hakozaki H, Yoshikawa H, Suzuki N, Kinosita K, Jr, Nishizaka T, et al. Stepwise motion of an actin filament over a small number of heavy meromyosin molecules is revealed in an in vitro motility assay. J Biochem 1994;115:644-647.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Svoboda K, Block SM. Force and velocity measured for single kinesin molecules. Cell 1994;77:773-784.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Grimbergen JA, Visscher K, Gomes de Mesquita DS, Brakenhoff GJ. Isolation of single yeast cells by optical trapping. Yeast 1993;9:723-732.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ashkin A, Dziedzic JM, Yamane T. Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams. Nature 1987;330:769-771.
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ashkin A, Dziedzic JM. Optical trapping and manipulation of viruses and bacteria. Science 1987;235:1517-1520.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Perkins TT, Smith DE, Larson RG, Chu S. Stretching of a single tethered polymer in a uniform flow. Science 1995;268:83-87.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang Z, Khan S, Sheetz MP. Single cytoplasmic dynein molecule movements: characterization and comparison with kinesin. Biophys J 1995;69:2011-2023.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sako Y, Kusumi A. Barriers for lateral diffusion of transferrin receptor in the plasma membrane as characterized by receptor dragging by laser tweezers: fence versus tether. J Cell Biol 1995;29:1559-1574.
-
Bronkhorst PJ, Streekstra GJ, Grimbergen J, Nijhof EJ, Sixma JJ, Brakenhoff GJ. A new method to study shape recovery of red blood cells using multiple optical trapping. Biophys J 1995;69:1666-1673.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mazzola LT, Fodor SP. Imaging biomolecule arrays by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 1995;68:1653-1660.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jondle DM, Ambrosio L, Vesenka J, Henderson E. Imaging and manipulating chromosomes with the atomic force microscope. Chromosome Res 1995;3:239-244.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zachee P, Boogaerts M, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L. Imaging uremic red blood cells with the atomic force microscope. Am J Nephrol 1994;14:197-200.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hansma HG, Revenko I, Kim K, Laney DE. Atomic force microscopy of long and short double-stranded, single-stranded and triple-stranded nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:713-720.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Allen MJ, Bradbury EM, Balhorn R. The natural subcellular surface structure of the bovine sperm cell. J Struct Biol 1995;114:197-208.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mou J, Czajkowsky DM, Sheng SJ, Ho R, Shao Z. High resolution surface structure of E. coli GroES oligomer by atomic force microscopy. FEBS Lett 1996;381:161-164.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mou J, Czajkowsky DM, Zhang Y, Shao Z. High-resolution atomic-force microscopy of DNA: the pitch of the double-helix. FEBS Lett 1995;371:279-282.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Boland T, Ratner BD. Direct measurement of hydrogen bonding in DNA nucleotide bases by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:5297-5301.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chilkoti A, Boland T, Ratner BD, Stayton PS. The relationship between ligand-binding thermodynamics and proteinligand interaction forces measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 1995;69:2125-2130.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dammer U, Popescu O, Wagner P, Anselmetti D, Guntherodt HJ, Misevic GN. Binding strength between cell adhesion proteoglycans measured by atomic force microscopy. Science 1995;267:1173-1175.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lyubchenko YL, Jacobs BL, Lindsay SM, Stasiak A. Atomic force microscopy of nucleoprotein complexes. Scanning Microsc 1995;9:705-724.
[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stevenson R. PCR and optical trapping may team up for single cell genetic screeningfirst target: replacing amniocentesis. Am Biotechnol Lab 1991;9:14.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]