|
|
||||||||
Review |
a Address correspondence to this author, at: Klinikum der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institut für Humangenetik und Anthropologie, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07740 Jena, Germany. Fax 03641-631713; e-mail rdah{at}mti-n.uni-jena.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: indexing terms: cell regulation aging chromosomes tumorigenesis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| telomeres |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Telomeres are composed of a DNA component and multiple protein
components (3). The telomeric DNA consists of noncoding
tandemly repeated sequences, with the exact repeat sequence varying
from one species to the other. In humans and other vertebrates, the
repeat unit is the hexanucleotide TTAGGG (5'
3' direction). Although
telomeres are generally considered to be localized structures at the
ends of chromosomes, such sequences are also being identified at
internal positions in chromosomes (4). The length of
telomeres also varies among different species. Humans have telomeres
814 kilobasepairs (kbp) long, whereas the mean telomeric repeat
lengths in some ciliates are as little as 36 bp, and those in mice may
be as much as 150 kbp (5). In human chromosomes, telomeres
are adjoined centromerically by a subtelomeric region consisting of
degenerated telomeric DNA sequences and unique repeats
((6), and Fig. 1
).
|
All chromosomes lose a small amount of telomeric DNA during each cell
division (Fig. 2
)a natural consequence of the nature of the cellular DNA
replication machinery. DNA polymerases replicate only in a 5'
3'
direction by extending existing polynucleotide chains. The mechanism of
DNA replication differs for the leading and the lagging DNA strands.
The leading strand is replicated continually. To replicate the lagging
strand, DNA polymerization starts from several RNA primers, which are
elongated to create DNA fragments termed Okazaki fragments. These RNA
primers are finally degraded and replaced by DNA sequences. Removal of
the terminal RNA primer on the lagging strand leaves a gap that
ordinarily is filled in by extension of the next Okazaki fragment.
Because there is no template for the "last" Okazaki
fragment beyond the 5' end of the chromosome, one strand cannot be
synthesized to its very end. This so-called end replication problem
predicts the progressive reduction of chromosomal DNA at the 3' ends
during multiple cell cycles.
|
| telomerase |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, the telomerase RNAs of yeasts and humans have been cloned (12)(13). The large size of human telomerase RNA and its molecular mass (>300 kDa) suggest that the human telomerase enzyme complex has more than two protein subunits (14). The telomerase proteins seem to have structural importance by binding dNTPs (deoxynucleoside triphosphates) or DNA sequences. Their catalytic tools provide the functional groups that catalyze the addition of nucleotides to the 3' end. The basic telomerase reaction mechanisms are primer recognition and base pairing, nucleotide addition, and translocation. Accordingly, Kim et al. (15) developed an assay for testing telomerase activity in cell extracts. Based on identification of telomerase mechanisms and properties, the telomere repeat amplification protocol includes preparation of a protein extract by cell lysis and adding a primer and dNTPs. If telomerase is active in the extract, it elongates the added template, and the reaction product is amplified by PCR. Because telomerase pauses after synthesis of a set of six nucleotides, amplification products separated on a polyacrylamide gel look like a 6-bp nucleotide ladder. Using this amplification protocol, one can detect 1 telomerase-positive cell among 10 000 cells.
| telomeres, telomerase, cellular aging, and immortality |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Telomere length and stability in adult somatic cells differ from those in fetal and germline cells. In the somatic tissues of an individual, the telomeres are noticeably shorter than in sperm cells, and lengths decrease with increasing age of the individual. On the other hand, telomeres in sperm maintain their length independently of increasing individual age (19).
In cultured cells, the loss of telomeric DNA depends on the number of cell divisions, and Allsopp et al. have noted that telomere length is a useful predictor of the residual proliferative capacity of cells (19). In this context, the question arises as to whether one could achieve unlimited replication capacity and immortality in somatic cells if telomere length could be maintained. Counter et al. (20) transfected normal human embryonic kidney cells with Simian Virus 40 tumor antigen (SV 40 T), forming a tumor virus protein that extended the lifespan of cultured cells. The transfected cells divided and entered a point of crisis, in which most of the cells died; only some cells became immortal. During the period of cell division, the telomeres shortened continually and no telomerase activity could be detected. Those cells that survived the crisis point and became immortal had reactivated telomerase and stabilized their telomeres. This means that even somatic cells can gain the ability of endless replication if telomere length is maintained and (or) the enzyme telomerase is activated.
Cells in culture are thought to stop dividing because of activation of
an antiproliferative mechanism termed "mortality stage 1" (M1). The
stimulus for the induction of M1 may be DNA-damage signals from the
altered expression of subtelomeric regulatory genes or from a critical
shortened telomere. P53 and the retinoblastoma gene product pRb are
involved in the execution of M1. One hypothesis for the induction of M1
postulates the following: (a) a single chromosome denuded of
telomeric repeats produces a DNA-damage signal, which (b)
induces p53 and p21; (c) p21 inhibits the cyclin-dependent
kinases, which then (d) are prevented from phosphorylating
pRb; (e) the presence of unphosphorylated pRb coupled with
other actions of p53 and p21 results in the M1 arrest
(21). If these cell cycle regulators are mutated or
blocked, the cells continue to divide and thus the telomeres continue
to shorten. Cells divide until a second independent block in
proliferation is reached, termed "mortality stage 2" (M2). The M2
mechanism is probably induced when so few telomere repeats remain that
the unprotected chromosomal ends block further proliferation. The M2
block might be overcome in some cells by reactivation of telomerase,
the repair of chromosome ends, the stabilization of telomere length,
and the generation of an immortal cell clone
((21), and Fig. 3
).
|
The findings concerning telomerase activity in various human tissues
are in accord with the differences in the telomere length described
above: The enzyme is detectable in germline cells, but not in most
postnatal somatic tissues (Table 1
).
|
Telomerase-independent mechanisms may also exist that stabilize telomere length. Murnane et al. (22) and Bryan et al. (23) reported telomere elongation in immortal human cells without detectable telomerase activity. So far, it is not clear whether telomere stabilization in these cells is achieved by the above-mentioned recombination or transposition events, or whether transformed cells may develop alternative mechanisms to circumvent any possible telomerase inhibition.
The present knowledge about the role of telomeres and telomerase in cellular senescence carries scientists a step forward toward understanding the phenomenon of human aginga process accompanied by an accumulation of various cytogenetic changes and an increasing deficiency in DNA repair mechanisms. Lindsey et al. (24) found that in patients with syndromes of accelerated aging [progeria (i.e., HutchinsonGilford syndrome) and Werner syndrome], the mean telomere lengths in cell cultures were considerably shorter than in normal individuals. These premature aging syndromes are characterized in progeria by growth retardation and accelerated degenerative changes of the cutaneous, musculoskeletal, and cardiovascular systems in young patients (25), and in Werner syndrome, for which recently the a candidate gene has been identified (26), by an early-onset and accelerated rate of development of major geriatric disorders such as atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, and various neoplasms (27). Recently, Kruk et al. (28) demonstrated that repair of DNA damage in telomeric regions decreases with age. Possibly this deficiency in telomeric repair is correlated with an age-related increase in genetic instability.
| telomeres, telomerase, and cancer |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The length of telomeres in cancer cells depends on a balance between the telomere shortening at each cell cycle and the telomere elongation resulting from telomerase activity. Tumors with shorter telomeres than in the original tissue have been detected in many cancer types (for a review, see (30)). In neuroblastoma, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, leukemias, and lung cancer, a correlation between decreasing telomere lengths and an increasing severity of disease has been described (31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Short telomeres seem to be a primary cause for karyotype instability in malignant cells. According to the above-described theory of telomere dynamics during cell progression, tumor cells with shortened telomeres can be considered to have undergone many cell divisions, with an accumulation of various genetic alterations. After a point of critical telomere shortening, telomerase might be reactivated to stabilize or elongate the telomeric DNA.
Tumors with telomeres just as long as or even longer than in the original tissue seem to be rarer but have been described in some human malignant tissues, e.g., intracranial tumors, basal cell carcinomas of the skin, and renal cell carcinomas (36)(37)(38)(39). There are two possible explanations for this phenomenon: Either an activated telomerase has elongated the once-shortened telomeres back to former length, or the tumor cells have not yet undergone enough cell divisions to induce significant shortening of telomeres.
Telomerase is absent in most human somatic cells (see Table 1
) but, as
Rhyu reports (40), was detected in ~85% of 400 tumor
tissue samples. Low amounts of telomerase activity in normal human
tissues were found only in hematopoietic progenitor cells and activated
T- and B-lymphocytes (41); in germ cells, ovaries, and
testes (42); and in physiologically regenerating
epithelial cells (43). Results from examinations of normal
tissues and benign cancers as well as malignant primary and metastatic
tumors permit several conclusions. As in most normal tissues,
telomerase activity is not expressed in somatic tissues adjacent to the
tumor tissue. Accordingly, telomerase activity has proved to be a
reliable marker for detecting tumor cells in resection margins.
In benign and premalignant tumors, including breast fibrocystic disease and fibroadenomas, benign prostatic hyperplasia, colorectal adenomas, anaplastic astrocytomas, and benign meningiomas and leiomyomas, in general no telomerase activity was detected; however, it was found in malignant tumor stages (44)(45)(46)(47). In this way, telomerase activity is associated with the acquisition of malignancy. The detection of telomerase activity at preneoplastic or benign growth stages may signify disease progression and be of diagnostic value. For example, telomerase activity has been found in some cases of benign prostate hyperplasia and of benign giant tumors of the bone (45)(48)all tissues that may progress to malignant tumors.
As shown by Hiyama et al. (44) in breast cancer, telomerase provides a useful diagnostic tumor marker: Among samples obtained by fine-needle aspiration, 14 of 14 patients whose aspirates contained detectable telomerase activity, and who subsequently underwent surgery, were confirmed to have breast cancer.
Certain tumor types, such as neuroblastoma, display a lower telomerase activity in early-stage cancers, whereas expression in late-stage cases is higher (49). Neuroblastomas of a special stage (stage IV), which had short telomeres and no or weak telomerase activity, tended to regress spontaneously (49)possible proof of a correlation between an enzyme activity too weak to remain in an immortal tumor status and a favorable outcome for the patient.
Another example of telomerase activity in cancer diagnosis and as a prognostic indicator of clinical outcome is the results found in gastric cancers. Hiyama et al. (50) showed that the survival rate of patients with tumors with detectable telomerase activity in their study was shorter than that of those without telomerase activity.
Although a reliable tumor marker, telomerase activity is not an all-or-none phenomenon. To understand the regulation of telomerase during tumorigenesis, Greider et al. analyzed the concentrations of telomerase RNA components and discussed the differential regulation of enzyme activity according to the concentration of the RNA component (51)(52).
Further prospective and retrospective clinical studies must be carried out to assess the validity of telomere dynamics and telomerase as a diagnostic or prognostic marker in many cancer types.
| telomerase as a target for anticancer therapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the greatest challenges in cancer therapy is to achieve a high therapeutic effect by maximizing the desired reactions and minimizing the undesired side-effects. Several conditions must be successfully fulfilled to achieve a beneficial antitumor effect in vivo:
1) Introduction of the antitumor agent into the majority and perhaps 100% of the tumor cells
2) The antitumor agent reaching the target
3) Tumor cell death
4) Acceptable toxicity to normal cells
5) Absence of a deleterious host immune response.
One of the most hopeful approaches to achieving these goals is oligonucleotide-based gene therapy. The regulation of expression of genetic information by complementary pairing of sense and antisense nucleic acid strands has been termed "antisense." It is now possible to design antisense DNA oligonucleotides or antisense RNAs that can pair with and functionally inhibit the expression of genes in a sequence fashion. This high degree of specificity has made antisense constructs attractive candidates for therapeutic agents (53). Because the antisense sequences require chemical modifications to avoid destruction by nucleases and to form complexes for better delivery into the cell, peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) have been designedwith a charge-neutral, pseudo-peptide backbone of N-(2-aminoethyl)glycine units instead of a negatively charged deoxyribose-phosphate backbone (54).
Recently, Norton et al. (55) reported on PNAs that have a sequence complementary to the RNA component of human telomerase. They designed oligonucleotides that bind to the RNA molecule within the telomerase, which serves as the enzyme's own internal telomere template. These molecules seem to be very specific and efficient inhibitors of telomerase in vitro. Further experiments with cell cultures and tumor models in mice will continue this path of investigation and could justify the optimism surrounding the telomerase hypothesis and its exploitation as a novel anti-cancer therapy.
Several important unanswered questions remain. A possible therapeutic approach of telomerase to cancer patients would appear to be less toxic than conventional chemotherapy, which affects all dividing cells and has undesirable side effects. However, some normal somatic cells are telomerase-positive at baseline: human hematopoietic progenitor cells, germ cells (progenitors of sperm and oocytes), and activated T-and B-lymphocytes. Telomeric DNA in these cells would be lost during an "anti-telomerase therapy." Perhaps this loss could be buffered, because of the longer telomeres in these cells than in cancer cells and because of the lower division rate relative to tumor cells. Another problem is in the variability of telomere lengths among tumors. Telomerase inhibition seems to be useful only in malignant cells with short telomeres; tumor cells with long telomeres would require a prolonged treatment, with possible toxic side-effects. One should also consider that alternative pathways besides telomerase may exist for regulating telomere length.
Many other issues remain to be resolved. Even if the causal relationship were clear between continually shrinking telomeres and cellular senescence on the one side and unlimited proliferation of cells that have stabilized their telomeres' length by the enzyme telomerase on the other, we still need to learn: Which genes encode telomerase components? Are telomeric RNA and proteins regulated at the transcriptional or posttranscriptional level? Does regulation of the RNA or of the protein components determine activity? Do internal cellular mechanisms exist to repress telomerase? Based on the present knowledge of telomeres and telomerase mechanisms, considerable efforts will have to be taken to answer these open questions and to make use of the new results for developing new diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
S. H. Ghaffari, N. Shayan-Asl, A. H. Jamialahmadi, K. Alimoghaddam, and A. Ghavamzadeh Telomerase activity and telomere length in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia: indicative of proliferative activity, disease progression, and overall survival Ann. Onc., November 1, 2008; 19(11): 1927 - 1934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shen, M. B. Terry, I. Gurvich, Y. Liao, R. T. Senie, and R. M. Santella Short Telomere Length and Breast Cancer Risk: A Study in Sister Sets Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5538 - 5544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Hess and W. E. Highsmith Jr Telomerase Detection in Body Fluids Clin. Chem., January 1, 2002; 48(1): 18 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xu and X. Yang Telomerase Activity in Early Bovine Embryos Derived from Parthenogenetic Activation and Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, March 1, 2001; 64(3): 770 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xu and X. Yang Telomerase Activity in Bovine Embryos During Early Development Biol Reprod, October 1, 2000; 63(4): 1124 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gelmini, A. Crisci, B. Salvadori, M. Pazzagli, C. Selli, and C. Orlando Comparison of Telomerase Activity in Bladder Carcinoma and Exfoliated Cells Collected in Urine and Bladder Washings, Using a Quantitative Assay Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2771 - 2776. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
I. Bièche, C. Noguès, V. Paradis, M. Olivi, P. Bedossa, R. Lidereau, and M. Vidaud Quantitation of hTERT Gene Expression in Sporadic Breast Tumors with a Real-Time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2000; 6(2): 452 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Lavranos, J. M. Mathis, S. E. Latham, B. Kalionis, J. W. Shay, and R. J. Rodgers Evidence for Ovarian Granulosa Stem Cells: Telomerase Activity and Localization of the Telomerase Ribonucleic Acid Component in Bovine Ovarian Follicles Biol Reprod, August 1, 1999; 61(2): 358 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. M. D. Lo Quantitative Assays for Telomerase: Means for Studying the End Clin. Chem., December 1, 1998; 44(12): 2399 - 2400. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gelmini, A. Caldini, L. Becherini, S. Capaccioli, M. Pazzagli, and C. Orlando Rapid, quantitative nonisotopic assay for telomerase activity in human tumors Clin. Chem., October 1, 1998; 44(10): 2133 - 2138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. O'Kane, T. A. Ebert, B. J. Hallaway, S. G. Roberts, A. K. M. J. Bhuiyan, and K. S. Tenner A laboratorian's perspective on evaluation and implementation of new laboratory tests Clin. Chem., September 1, 1997; 43(9): 1771 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |