Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 1285-1287, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, P. C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, D. E.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, P. C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, D. E.C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:1285-1287.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Simple and Rapid Detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations by Multiplex Mutagenically Separated PCR

Pak Cheung R. Chan1,*, Betty Y.L. Wong2, Hilmi Ozcelik1,3 and David E.C. Cole1,2,4,a

1 Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology;
2 Genetic Repository, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4;
3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Centre for Cancer Genetics, Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1X5;
4 Medicine and Pediatrics (Genetics), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1L5;
a address correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Rm. 402, Banting Institute, 100 College St., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1L5: fax 416-978-5650, e-mail davidec.cole{at}utoronto.ca

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes that are inactivated during neoplastic development (1)(2). Germline mutations of the two genes are transmitted in the autosomal dominant fashion and predispose carriers to the development of ovarian and/or breast cancers (3)(4). Mutations in BRCA1 are present in approximately one-half of the early-onset breast cancer families and 80% of the early-onset breast and ovarian cancer families (5), whereas BRCA2 mutations are believed to account for a comparable percentage of inherited breast cancer cases (6). Women with germline mutations in BRCA1 have a lifetime risk of 85% and up to 50% for breast and ovarian cancers, respectively.

In individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish background, mutations such as 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1, and 6174delT in BRCA2 are present in higher frequencies than other mutations because of founder effects (6)(7)(8). In one study, the three mutations accounted for 62% of Ashkenazi patients with ovarian and/or breast cancer (7). The high frequency of these mutations in the BRCA genes indicates their potential role in identifying individuals at risk.

Many methods have been reported for the study of BRCA mutations, including allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization (8)(9), allele-specific PCR (10), PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis (11)(12), heteroduplex analysis (HDA) (13)(14)(15), single-strand conformation polymorphism (14)(16), and the protein truncation test (14)(15). Methods such as HDA, single-strand conformation polymorphism, and the protein truncation test, which are suitable for screening uncharacterized mutations, are relatively more laborious, whereas allele-specific PCR, PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis, and allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization are more efficient for screening of specific characterized mutations.

Here we describe a simple and rapid method for the simultaneous detection of three common mutations: 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1, and 6174delT in BRCA2. Blood samples were obtained with written informed consent. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood cells as described previously (17), coded, and analyzed in a blind fashion. Allele-specific oligonucleotide primers were designed on the basis of published BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequences (18)(19) and checked against the NIH database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast/) for possible false priming. For each mutation, three primers (one common, one specific for the mutant, and one specific for the wild-type allele) were used. The competing mutant and wild-type primers were designed to differ by ~20 bp in size, allowing easy detection of the PCR products by routine electrophoresis and ultraviolet illumination after ethidium bromide staining. The mutant (long) and wild-type (short) primers both contain a mismatched base sequence near the 3' end. In the early cycles of amplification, the mismatched sequences generate mutagenized PCR products that are refractory to cross-amplification by the competing primer, thereby ensuring specificity of the reaction (20). The long (mutant) primer also incorporates two additional mismatched bases at two contiguous positions corresponding to the 5' end of the short (wild-type) primer. During the final cycles of the PCR reaction, heteroduplexes may be formed from the short and long products, but the contiguous mutagenized sequences in the long product prevent filling up of the short product by using the long strand as template. As a result, the mutant and wild-type products are separated mutagenically. The primer sequences and sizes of corresponding amplicons are shown in Table 1 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Nucleotide sequences of the primer sets.

PCR amplification was carried out using the GeneAmp® PCR 2400 system from Perkin-Elmer. In each PCR reaction, 25 ng of genomic DNA was added to 10 µL of reaction mixture consisting of 1x PCR reaction buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, 0.01 g/L gelatin), 3.25 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L dNTPs, and 50 kU/L AmpliTaq GoldTM (all from Perkin-Elmer). Allele-specific primers were added at 2.0 µmol/L for P1 and P3; 0.4 µmol/L for P2; 0.12 µmol/L for P4, P5, and P6; 0.31 µmol/L for P7 and P9; and 0.24 µmol/L for P8. Each PCR reaction consisted of an initial 12 min of AmpliTaq Gold activation at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 15 s of denaturation at 94 °C, 15 s of annealing at 57 °C, and 30 s of extension (with an increment of 1 s for each subsequent cycle) at 72 °C, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C. At the conclusion of the reaction, the PCR product was mixed with 2 µL of loading dye (200 g/L sucrose, 0.05 g/L bromphenol blue) and then separated on precast Clearose BG Mini (9 x 12 cm) Gels (Elchrom Scientific) by routine submerged electrophoresis (120 V, 80 min). The resolved amplicons were then stained with 0.5 mg/L ethidium bromide and viewed under ultraviolet illumination.

Like other PCR techniques, mutagenically separated PCR (MS-PCR) requires careful optimization of each reaction condition, including magnesium concentration, cosolvents (dimethyl sulfoxide or glycerol), and length and temperature of cycling stages. More importantly, the concentrations (relative and absolute) of individual primers must be determined empirically to give relatively equal amplification of the wild-type and mutant alleles. If a mutation is present in one of the alleles, two bands will be present. For the 185delAG mutation, the mutant and wild-type amplicons are 354 and 335 bp, whereas those of 5382insC are 295 and 271 bp, and those of 6174delT are 171 and 151 bp. Therefore, a minimum of three bands (absence of any mutant allele) and a maximum of six bands (all three mutations) can be detected. Fig. 1 shows the electrophoretogram with patterns for zero to three mutations present in a single sample. Because at least one of the two allelic PCR products is present, MS-PCR provides an intrinsic quality control against false negatives or PCR refractory conditions. The presence of wild-type and mutant allelic products also allows easy and objective interpretation of test results.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Electrophoretogram of MS-PCR products.

Lane 1, 100-bp ladder; lanes 2 and 3, wild-type samples; lanes 4–6, patient samples with the 185delAG, 5382insC, and 6174delT mutations, respectively; lanes 7–9, equal volumes of 185delAG + 5382insC, 185delAG + 6174delT, and 5382insC + 6174delT, respectively; lane 10, equal volumes of each of the three mutations. M, mutant product; W, wild-type product.

We evaluated this assay using a cohort of 66 Ashkenazi Jewish women at an increased risk for breast/ovarian cancer (all have a blood relative diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer). The genetic status of this cohort of patients had previously been ascertained by HDA (15) and DNA sequencing. Using the optimized procedure, we identified 7 individuals with the 185delAG mutation, 4 with the 5382insC mutation, 3 with the 6174delT mutation, and 52 without any of the three mutations. The results were identical to HDA and DNA sequencing, indicating the reliability of MS-PCR technique. Overall, the multiplex approach allows easy and simultaneous detection of the three mutations. This assay eliminates the need for radioisotopes, endonuclease digestion, and high-resolution electrophoresis. We conclude that this method is simple, reliable, and can be considered for routine use.


Acknowledgments

We thank the Ontario Cancer Genetics Network and those who participated in the study.


Footnotes

* Pak Cheung Chan is a recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine from the Ontario Ministry of Health, Canada


References

  1. Smith SA, Easton DF, Evens DG, Ponder BA. Allele losses in the region 17q12-21 in familial breast and ovarian cancer involve the wild-type chromosome. Nat Genet 1992;2:128-131. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Collins N, McManus R, Wooster R, Mangion J, Seal S, Lakhani SR, et al. Consistent loss of the wild type allele in breast cancers from a family linked to the BRCA2 gene on the chromosome 13q12-13. Oncogene 1995;10:1673-1675. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ford D, Easton DF, Peto J. Estimates of the frequency of BRCA1 and its contribution to breast and ovarian cancer incidence. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:1457-1462. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Wooster R, Bignell G, Lancaster J, Swift S, Seal S, Mangion J, et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 1995;378:789-792. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Easton DF, Bishop DT, Ford D, Crockford GP, . the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:678-701. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Roa BB, Boyd AA, Volcik K, Richards CS. Ashkenazi Jewish population frequencies for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nat Genet 1996;14:185-187. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Abeliovich D, Kaduri L, Lerer I, Weinberg N, Gail A, Sagi M, et al. The founder mutations 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2 appear in 60% of ovarian cancer and 30% of early-onset breast cancer patients among Ashkenazi women. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:505-514. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Stuewing JP, Abeliovich D, Petertz T, Avishai N, Kaback MM, Collins FS, Brody LC. The carrier frequency of the BRCA1 mutation 185delAG mutation is approximately 1 percent in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals. Nat Genet 1995;11:198-200. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Johannsson O, Ostemeyer EA, Hakansson S, Friedman L, Johansson U, Selberg G, et al. Founding BRCA1 mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in southern Sweden. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:441-450. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Fitzgerald MG, MacDonald DJ, Krainer M, Hoover O, I, 'Neil E, Unsal H, et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early-onset breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1996;334:143-149. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Haliassos A, Chomel JC, Tesson L, Baudis M, Kruh J, Kaplan JC, Kitzis A. Modification of enzymatically amplified DNA for the detection of point mutations. Nucleic Acids Res 1989;17:3606.[Free Full Text]
  12. Rohlfs EM, Learning WG, Friedman KJ, Couch FJ, Weber BL, Silverman LM. Direst detection of mutations in the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 by PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis. Clin Chem 1997;43:24-29. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gayther SA, Harrington P, Russell P, Kharkevich G, Garkavtseva RF, Ponder BAJ, . the UKCCCR Familial Ovarian Cancer Study Group. Rapid detection of regionally clustered germline BRCA1 mutations by multiplex heteroduplex analysis. Am J Hum Genet 1996;58:451-456. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Friedman LS, Gayther SA, Kurosaki T, Gordon D, Noble B, Casey G, et al. Mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a male breast cancer population. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:313-319. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Ozcelik H, Antebi Y, Cole DEC, Andrulis IL. Heteroduplex and protein truncation analysis of the BRCA1 185delAG mutation. Hum Genet 1996;98:310-312. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Kozlowski P, Sobczak K, Napierala M, Wozniak M, Czarny J, Krzyzosiak WJ. PCR-SSCP-HDX analysis of germline mutations in large genes. The BRCA1 example. Nucleic Acids Res 1996;24:1177-1178. [Free Full Text]
  17. Lahiri DK, Nurnberger JI, Jr. A rapid non-enzymatic method for the preparation of HMW DNA from blood for RFLP studies. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;19:5444.[Free Full Text]
  18. Smith TM, Lee MK, Szabo CI, Jerome N, McEuen M, Taylor M, et al. Complete genomic sequence and analysis of 117 kb of human DNA containing the gene BRCA1. Genome Res 1996;6:1029-1049. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Teng DH, Bogden R, Mitchell J, Baumgard M, Bell R, Berry S, et al. Low incidence of BRCA2 mutations in breast carcinoma and other cancers. Nat Genet 1996;13:241-244. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Rust S, Funke H, Assmann G. Mutagenically separated PCR (MS-PCR): a highly specific one step procedure for easy mutation detection. Nucleic Acids Res 1993;21:3623-3629. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Rogozinska-Szczepka, B. Utracka-Hutka, E. Grzybowska, B. Maka, E. Nowicka, A. Smok-Ragankiewicz, H. Zientek, J. Steffen, and A. Wojciechowska-Lacka
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations as prognostic factors in bilateral breast cancer patients
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2004; 15(9): 1373 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, P. C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, D. E.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, P. C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, D. E.C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS