Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 46: 47-54, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:47-54.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Molecular Forms of Prostate-specific Antigen in Malignant and Benign Prostatic Tissue: Biochemical and Diagnostic Implications

Klaus Jung1,a, Brigitte Brux2, Michael Lein1, Birgit Rudolph3, Glen Kristiansen3, Steffen Hauptmann3, Dietmar Schnorr1, Stefan A. Loening1 and Pranav Sinha2

Departments of
1 Urology,
2 Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry, and
3 Pathology, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Schumannstrasse 20/21, D-10098 Berlin, Germany.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 49-30-2802-1402; e-mail klaus.jung{at}charite.de


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) show a lower ratio of free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) to total PSA (tPSA) in serum than patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The patterns of the intracellular PSA isoforms in malignant and benign prostatic tissue have been studied as potential molecular reasons for this phenomenon.

Methods: Prostatic tissue samples were obtained after cystoprostatectomy from patients with bladder cancer (n = 10), from BPH patients (transurethral resection of the prostate, n = 10; adenomectomy, n = 10), and from the cancerous and noncancerous parts of the same prostates removed surgically by prostatectomy because of PCa (n = 20). PSA pattern was characterized by gel filtration, immunoblotting, and immunoassays for tPSA, fPSA, {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin-PSA (ACT-PSA), and complexed PSA (Bayer Immuno 1 assay). Comparisons were made with the PSA concentrations in serum.

Results: The major portion of tPSA in all tissue samples was fPSA; complexed PSA forms were <2%. Samples from cystoprostatectomy patients had the lowest and those from adenomectomy patients the highest values of tPSA and fPSA. PSA concentrations were lower in cancerous than in the noncancerous parts of the prostate. No significant correlations were found between tumor stage or grade and the amounts of tPSA, fPSA, and ACT-PSA in tissue. Tissue PSA values were not correlated with the serum PSA concentrations nor with the ratios fPSA/tPSA and ACT-PSA/tPSA in sera.

Conclusions: The amounts of tPSA and the PSA isoforms in prostatic tissue explain neither the concentrations of tPSA and PSA isoforms in serum nor the behavior of the ratio fPSA/tPSA in patients with BPH and PCa.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)1 occurs in serum in different molecular forms (1)(2). Approximately 70–90% of the total PSA (tPSA) is bound to {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin (ACT), and a small amount is complexed with {alpha}1-antitrypsin and protein C. The portion of PSA that is complexed with {alpha}2-macroglobulin can be measured only if the complex is cleaved and the PSA epitopes become accessible. Free PSA (fPSA), the portion of PSA not bound to serum proteins, accounts for 10–30% of tPSA. A lower ratio of fPSA to tPSA (fPSA/tPSA) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) has been demonstrated in numerous studies [reviewed in Ref. (3)]. This ratio has been considered as a helpful tool for distinguishing between PCa and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Several factors that influence the ratio fPSA/tPSA in serum, e.g., age, prostate size, drug treatment, prostate manipulation, sample stability, or assay method, have been reviewed recently (4)(5). However, the reason for the changed ratio in PCa patients has not yet been clarified on a molecular basis, although some hypotheses exist (6). Thus, the reduced ratio may be attributable to differences at the cellular level: (a) a changed synthesis of ACT in neoplastic cells compared with benign cells (7), leading to increased formation of ACT-PSA complex early in malignant cells before release into circulation; (b) the release of different proportions of enzymatically inactive PSA that react differently with ACT in the circulation (6)(8); and (c) the alteration of the glycosylation rate of PSA in neoplastic cells, leading to characteristic differences of the elimination kinetics of the PSA isoforms from blood (9).

Because these models have not been clarified in detail, our investigation had three objectives: (a) to assess the pattern of the main intracellular PSA isoforms in both malignant and benign prostatic tissue, using various biochemical techniques; (b) to evaluate the relationships between the intracellular PSA pattern and the occurrence of the serum PSA isoforms in patients with PCa and BPH; and (c) to infer from these results whether the intracellular PSA pattern determines the typical fPSA/tPSA ratio in serum of patients with PCa and BPH.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
study groups and samples
The use of tissue and blood samples for research purposes was approved by the Human Use Committee of the Charité Hospital, Berlin.

Groups investigated.
A total of 50 men were studied, including a group of 10 men (median age, 61 years; range, 44–72 years) undergoing cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer with a histologically confirmed absence of PCa (group CYS), 20 patients with BPH (median age, 71 years; range, 63–81 years), and 20 with PCa (median age, 65 years; range, 57–71 years). Ten of the BPH patients underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (group TUR-P), and 10 had open adenomectomies (group ADE). Each PCa patient had been classified according to the TNM system, and the histological grade had been classified as grade 1, 2, or 3. The number of patients in each classification according to pathological stages and grades were as follows: pT2 pN0M0, n = 14; pT3 pN0M0, n = 6; G1, n = 2; G2, n = 14; and G3, n = 4.

Blood samples.
Blood samples were taken before diagnostic procedures of the prostate or 4 weeks (at the earliest) after digital rectal examination, prostatic biopsy, and transrectal ultrasound. The samples were collected in evacuated tubes (Monovette 03.1528; Sarstedt GmbH) and were centrifuged at 1600g for 15 min at 4 °C after the blood had clotted for 1 h at room temperature. The sera were frozen at -80 °C within 2 h after collection and were not thawed (and refrozen) before being tested within 12 weeks.

Tissue samples.
Prostate tissue samples were obtained from the cancerous and noncancerous parts of the same prostates that had been surgically removed by radical prostatectomy so that matched pairs were used. Small pieces of tissue were dissected immediately after removal of the prostate and stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis. The cut edges within the prostate were inked so that the dissected pieces could easily be assigned to the adjacent prostate tissue examined histopathologically. Similarly, prostate tissue material from cystoprostatectomies, adenomectomies, and transurethral resections were collected. Histological analysis from all tissue pieces used was performed by clinical pathologists (B.R. and G.K.) as described previously in detail to ensure that the material used was either malignant or nonmalignant tissue (4).

Preparation of tissue extracts.
Tissue samples (~30–50 mg) were thawed, cut into small pieces, and homogenized in 100 µL of 10 mmol/L sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.46, containing 2.5 mL/L Triton X-100 with a Wheaton glass homogenizer by 10 strokes on ice and were additionally sonicated. The homogenate was transferred into a 1.5-mL tube (Eppendorf GmbH). The homogenizer was rinsed twice with 100 µL of Triton solution. This mixture of 300 µL was centrifuged at 23 000g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed. To investigate the effect of the extraction procedure, the pellet was resuspended and the extraction was repeated several times. The recommended final extraction procedure consisted of three extractions with Triton solution and the measurements of the analytes in the combined supernatants. All supernatants were stored at -80 °C until analysis.

Additional samples investigated.
To compare the results obtained with samples described in the study groups, the following specimens were used: a serum with high PSA concentration (2170 µg/L) from a patient with advanced PCa; seminal plasma; and purified PSA from human seminal fluid (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) incubated at 37 °C for 3 h with either 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 g/L human serum albumin (Serva Feinbiochemica) or with a female serum pool. All samples were stored at -80 °C until used.

procedures
Immunoassays for PSA.
As indicated in the text, tPSA was measured with the Roche Elecsys PSA Immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics), the IMMULITE PSA assay (Diagnostic Products), the AxSYM PSA assay (Abbott Diagnostics), or the Bayer Immuno 1 PSA Assay (Bayer Diagnostics). fPSA was measured with the IMMULITE Free PSA kit, the Roche Elecsys Free PSA Immunoassay, or the AxSYM Free PSA assay. According to the information provided by the manufacturers, all tests are equimolar assays for determining PSA. To measure complexed PSA (cPSA), a recently introduced immunoassay ( product no. T01-3982-51; Bayer Diagnostics) for the Bayer Immuno 1 system was used (10). This assay is based on the unique binding properties of the capture monoclonal antibody MM1 used in the Bayer Immuno 1 assay for tPSA. That antibody fails to bind fPSA in the presence of specific antibodies against epitope E, which is exposed only in fPSA, so that all cPSA forms such ACT-PSA and minor forms except PSA complexed to {alpha}2-macroglobulin are detected.

To measure ACT-PSA, two prototype assays on the ES immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics) were used. The principle of the tests was described previously and is based on the two-step sandwich technique (11). Samples are incubated in the first step with specific monoclonal biotinylated antibodies, forming a PSA-antibody sandwich complex that is bound by the biotinylated antibodies to the streptavidin-coated tubes. After washing, an horseradish peroxidase-labeled mouse anti-ACT conjugate for determining ACT-PSA is added and bound to the PSA-antibody complex in a second incubation cycle. The two assays differed in the use of different antibodies. After incubation, the tubes are emptied and washed. The substrate diammonium 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonate) is then added, and the absorbance is measured after 30 min.

To measure PSA and its isoforms in tissue extracts, the supernatants were removed from the freezer and thawed by agitation at room temperature. Necessary dilutions were made either with 50 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 50 g/L human serum albumin or with special dilution solutions supplied with the corresponding test kits.

Gel filtration chromatography.
Samples containing 1.3–2.5 µg of tPSA were loaded on a Sephacryl S-200 column (1.6 x 90 cm; Pharmacia) and eluted with 20 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 150 mmol/L NaCl and 5 mmol/L NaN3 at a flow rate of 9.6 mL/h. Fractions (1.6-mL) were collected, aliquoted, and stored at -80 °C until analysis within 12 weeks. The column was calibrated with ferritin (450 kDa), catalase (240 kDa), bovine serum albumin (65 kDa), egg albumin (45 kDa), chymotrypsinogen A (25 kDa), and equine myoglobin (17.8 kDa) by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm in the fractions.

Electrophoresis and immunoblotting.
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed under reducing conditions on the Midget Electrophoresis Unit 2050 (LKB) according to the standard method of Laemmli (12). Samples heated at 95 °C for 5 min in sample buffer containing 50 mL/L 2-mercaptoethanol and 20 g/L SDS were applied to a 4% stacking gel and electrophoresed through a 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel containing 1 g/L SDS. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P; Amersham Life Science) by the Multiblot Electrophoresis Transfer Unit 2051 (LKB). The transfer buffer contained 25 mmol/L Tris, 192 mmol/L glycine, 200 mL/L methanol, and 0.375 g/L SDS. The blots were blocked with 50 g/L powdered nonfat milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 mL/L Tween 20 for 1 h at room temperature, washed, and then incubated for 1 h with a 2000-fold dilution of primary antibody (rabbit anti-PSA, cat. no. A0562; rabbit anti-ACT, cat. no. A022; Dako). Bands were visualized with horseradish peroxidase conjugated to anti-mouse IgG (diluted 3000-fold; Amersham) and a chemiluminescence reaction according to the instructions of the manufacturer (ECL-Plus system; Amersham). The Perfect Protein Western Blot Kit (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) consisting of seven recombinant proteins was used as the molecular marker set.

Other determinations.
Protein concentrations in tissue extracts were measured with Coomassie Brilliant Blue assay reagent, using bovine serum albumin as the calibrator (13). DNA was assayed using the fluorescence dye Hoechst 33258 in phosphate-buffered saline solution (14).

statistical analysis
Data were analyzed with the statistical software SPSS 8.0 for Windows (SPSS) and GraphPad Prism 3.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software). The Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric ANOVA with Dunn’s post test, the Mann–Whitney U-test, the Wilcoxon test for paired data, and the calculation of rank correlation coefficients according to Spearman (rS) were performed. Regression analysis for method evaluation was performed using the software EVAPAK 3.01 for Windows according to Passing and Bablok (15). P <=0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
tPSA, fPSA, cPSA, ANDACT-PSA IN TISSUE SAMPLES
When the PSA and protein concentrations measured in the separate supernatants after a fourfold extraction as described were summed up and considered as 100%, three extractions produced a mean recovery rate of 97.5% ± 4.84% for tPSA and 96.6% ± 1.2% for protein in 11 different extraction experiments. Thus, a three-step extraction procedure was used for all subsequent experiments. Tissue PSA values were related to the tissue protein, tissue DNA, and wet tissue weight. Only the PSA values related to the tissue protein (µg PSA/mg protein) were used for further presentations because PSA values related to the tissue protein were strongly correlated with PSA values related to the wet weight of the tissue (for tPSA, rS = 0.977; n = 70; P <0.0001; for fPSA, rS = 0.979; n = 70; P <0.0001) or with PSA values per DNA (for tPSA, rS = 0.959; n = 30; P <0.0001; for fPSA, rS = 0.959; n = 30; P <0.0001).

The scatter plots and medians of the tPSA, fPSA, ACT-PSA, and cPSA values in the various tissue samples are shown in Fig. 1 . These data and respective comparisons can be summarized as follows:



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Scatter plots of total PSA (A), fPSA (B), ACT-PSA (C), and cPSA (D) in prostatic tissue samples from various sources.

The PSA concentrations analyzed in the prostatic tissue extracts for tPSA, fPSA, and ACT-PSA with Roche assays and cPSA with the Bayer Immuno 1 assay were related to the tissue protein. Significant differences (Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post test, P <=0.05) between the samples are indicated as follows: a, significantly different from prostatic tissue obtained after cystoprostatectomy (Cyst); b, significantly different from prostatic tissue obtained after open adenomectomy (Ade); c, significantly different from prostatic tissue obtained after transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P); d and e, significantly different from prostatic tissue obtained after radical prostatectomy because of PCa from the noncancerous (PCaN) or the cancerous (PCa) part of the same prostate. Statistical differences between the cancerous and noncancerous tissue samples of the same prostate obtained after radical prostatectomy were tested by the Wilcoxon test for paired data. Horizontal lines and numbers indicate median values for each group.

• fPSA was the major form of PSA in prostatic tissue, independent of the source of the tissue. ACT-PSA yielded only a negligible amount of <0.5% of the tPSA. The minor occurrence of ACT-PSA was verified in comparative measurements by two different ACT-PSA assays based on different anti-PSA antibodies and by the low values of cPSA. The cPSA values were ~3- to 14-fold higher than ACT-PSA but did not exceed 2% of the total PSA.

• The fPSA values were significantly correlated with tPSA (rS = 0.964–0.964; P <0.01) and with ACT-PSA (rS = 0.454–0.648; P <0.05) in all tissue samples.

• Total and free PSA were partly different in the various sources of the prostatic tissue and showed large ranges. The samples obtained from cystoprostatectomy patients and histologically confirmed as nondiseased had the lowest values, and the samples from adenomectomy patients the highest values. tPSA and fPSA were significantly lower in tissue material obtained from transurethral resection of the prostate than in tissue from adenomectomies, although a similar pattern might be expected. PSA probably is damaged in tissue specimens by heat when the cauterizing loop is used for resection of the prostate.

• tPSA and fPSA were lower in cancerous than in noncancerous parts of prostate glands from patients with PCa. These differences were not observed for ACT-PSA and cPSA. No significant correlations were found between tumor stage and the tissue concentrations of tPSA, fPSA, and ACT-PSA (rS = 0.054, 0.108, and 0.225, respectively; P >0.05) and also between tumor grade and tPSA, fPSA, and ACT-PSA (rS = -0.13, -0.168, and -0.310, respectively; P >0.05).

• The sum of fPSA plus ACT-PSA or cPSA was ~90% of the tPSA, not varying significantly between the different sources of prostatic tissues (ANOVA; P >0.05; means, 84.5–92.9%). To further elucidate this phenomenon of incomplete recovery, comparative measurements of total and free PSA were performed with two additional assay systems (Abbott AxSYM and DPC IMMULITE). The fPSA/tPSA ratios obtained with the test systems (Roche, 85.4. ± 12.1; Abbott, 97.8 ± 8.1; DPC, 81.9 ± 6.6) differed significantly (ANOVA; P <0.05).

psa electrophoresis pattern of prostatic tissue
Fig. 2 A shows the PSA patterns representative of healthy prostatic tissue (lane 5) and tissue obtained from PCa (lanes 6 and 7) compared with patterns observed in seminal plasma (lane 2), purified PSA (lane 3), and serum from a patient with advanced PCa (lane 4). The immunoassay detected PSA in the serum at ~30 kDa and ~90 kDa, which corresponded to fPSA and the ACT-PSA complex, respectively. The PSA bands detected at >150 kDa are characteristic of PSA-{alpha}2-macroglobulin complexes (16). These complexes were not found in prostatic tissue samples, although ACT was present in prostatic tissue from cancerous and noncancerous sources (Fig. 2B ). However, distinct PSA bands below 30 kDa (lanes 5–7) also occurred in all prostatic tissue samples and in seminal plasma. These bands represent internally cleaved PSA molecules (17)(18)(19).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE immunoblotting analysis of PSA isoforms (A) and ACT (B) in various prostatic tissue samples, serum, and seminal plasma.

Proteins were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to a Hybond-P membrane, probed with the corresponding antibodies against PSA and ACT (for further details, see Materials and Methods), and visualized by the ECL-Plus detection system. (A), lane 1, molecular markers; lane 2, seminal plasma; lane 3, purified PSA; lane 4, PCa serum with tPSA of 2170 µg/L; lane 5, healthy prostatic tissue (from cystoprostatectomy); lanes 6 and 7, cancerous prostatic tissue. (B), lane 1, molecular markers; lane 2, PCa serum with tPSA of 2170 µg/L; lane 3, seminal plasma; lane 4, healthy prostatic tissue (from cystoprostatectomy); lane 5, noncancerous prostatic tissue from PCA patient; lanes 6 and 7, cancerous prostatic tissue.

psa gel filtration pattern of prostatic tissue
Gel filtration on Sephacryl S-200 revealed typical PSA profiles for the various prostatic tissue samples studied in comparison with serum, seminal plasma, and purified PSA incubated with serum albumin or female serum (Fig. 3 ). The peak at ~30 kDa corresponds to fPSA. The peak at ~90 kDa in serum of a patient with advanced PCa (Fig. 3A ) and in female serum incubated with purified PSA (Fig. 3C ) corresponds to the ACT-PSA complex. All prostatic tissue samples of cancerous or noncancerous origin (Fig. 3 , E-H) displayed only peaks of fPSA.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Gel filtration chromatography profiles of PSA from various sources.

Samples were applied to a Sephacryl S-200 column (1.6 x 90 cm) and eluted at a flow rate of 9.6 mL/h. Fractions (1.6 mL) were collected and analyzed for tPSA with the Abbott PSA assay. The elution profiles of the molecular markers catalase (240 kDa), bovine serum albumin (65 kDa), egg albumin (45 kDa), chymotrypsinogen A (25 kDa), and equine myoglobin (17.8 kDa) are indicated by arrows. To compare the PSA elution profiles, the profiles were given as normalized PSA values (percentages) by setting the peak PSA concentration at 100% and relating the PSA values in all other fractions to that value. (A), PCa serum with 2170 µg/L; (B), purified PSA in human serum albumin (50 g/L); (C), purified PSA equilibrated with female serum; (D), seminal plasma; (E–H), prostatic tissue samples.

tPSA, fPSA, cPSA, ANDACT-PSA IN SERUM
The serum PSA concentrations and the corresponding percentage ratios of fPSA/tPSA and ACT-PSA/tPSA are shown in Table 1 . The characteristic pattern of a lower fPSA/tPSA ratio and higher ACT-PSA/tPSA ratio in PCa patients compared with BPH patients was evident. However, no correlations were found between the serum and tissue tPSA concentrations in controls and patients with BPH and PCa (rS = -0.091, 0.307, and 0.241; P >0.10). In addition, the fPSA/tPSA and ACT-PSA/tPSA ratios in sera did not correlate with the tissue PSA concentrations (rS between 0.05 and 0.340; P >0.10).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Concentrations of tPSA, fPSA, ACT-PSA, and the fPSA/tPSA and fPSA/cPSA ratios in sera of controls and patients with BPH and PCa.1


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The different occurrences of free and complexed PSA forms in the serum of PCa and BPH patients and the use of the fPSA/tPSA ratio as a promising discriminatory tool between both groups of patients were briefly outlined earlier in the text. A better understanding of why this decreased ratio is typical of PCa patients might be helpful for physicians when interpreting the fPSA/tPSA ratio in clinical practice. The results of the present study give further insight into both the biochemical and clinical significance of the molecular forms of PSA.

It has been postulated that PSA is more extensively complexed in PCa cells than in nondiseased prostatic or BPH cells (7). Consequently, the lower fPSA/tPSA ratio in the serum of PCa patients has been assumed to reflect these cellular peculiarities after PSA is released into the blood stream (7). However, our data for the multiple PSA isoforms in various specimens of prostatic tissue and serum of the same patients (Fig. 1Up and Table 1Up ) clearly contradict that hypothesis.

The major form of prostatic tissue PSA is fPSA, whereas ACT-PSA or cPSA are <2% of tPSA. The tissue cPSA concentration is 3- to 14-fold higher than that of ACT-PSA. We believe that these differences are caused by additional PSA complexes that occur in prostatic tissue rather than by a slight cross-reaction of fPSA in the cPSA assay (10). For example, prostatic tissue contains high concentrations of {alpha}1-antitrypsin (20), which can form a complex with PSA (21). Thus, although ACT-PSA or cPSA contributes <2% of the total tissue PSA, the main proportion of the tPSA in serum is bound to ACT (Table 1Up ) or measured as cPSA (10). In addition, no correlations were found between tissue and serum PSA isoforms patterns. These quantitative data were corroborated by chromatographic and electrophoretic analyses of PSA and ACT in tissue extracts. Although the tPSA and fPSA were lower in cancerous than in noncancerous parts of the prostate (Fig. 1Up ), no changed pattern of tissue PSA isoforms was observed (Figs. 2Up and 3Up ). Moreover, the immunoblots (Fig. 2BUp ) and the immunostaining data by Igawa et al. (22) did not confirm a higher expression of ACT in malignant than in benign prostatic tissue, as described by Björk et al. (7). These data make it unlikely that the isoform pattern of the serum PSA is a simple reflection of the tissue PSA pattern. Other molecular mechanisms such as the changed proportions of enzymatically active and inactive PSA or posttranslational modification by glycosylation should be considered as possible explanations of the different fPSA/tPSA ratio in the serum of BPH and PCa patients (9)(23).

Enzymatically inactive PSA, also called "nicked PSA", is formed by internal proteolytic cleavage and is unable to bind ACT and other protease inhibitors (23). This nicking process for PSA probably takes place in the extracellular space before PSA reaches the circulation (6). It is assumed that PSA is subjected to this process in healthy and BPH tissue for longer periods of time than in PCa tissue, which additionally secretes PSA directly into the blood stream because of the altered tissue architecture (6). However, nicked PSA forms have also been found in BPH nodule fluid (8). These PSA forms also occurred in the tissue extracts from both PCa and BPH tissue (Fig. 2Up ). Whatever the reason, PCa serum shows a lower proportion of the cleaved forms than BPH serum (19). This phenomenon could be of great diagnostic significance (19).

The tissue PSA concentrations measured in our study were in the same range as reported by others but somewhat higher (24)(25). These differences could be explained by the use of different PSA assays. Our comparative experiments with various PSA assays support the view that the assays are not completely interchangeable, although all assays were exclusively calibrated against the Stanford 90:10 PSA Calibrator (26). The differences may be related to calibration problems or to the different immunoreactivities of the antibodies used in the assays for detecting free and total PSA (27). In addition, the different fPSA/tPSA ratios obtained with the three assay systems suggest that the differences of ~10% between the sum of fPSA plus ACT-PSA or cPSA and tPSA may be a result of incorrect calibration of the assays, e.g., for fPSA, rather than incomplete recovery of the PSA isoforms.

There are several reports on PSA expression in BPH and PCa tissue specimens based on immunohistochemistry (22)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), whereas only a few studies determined tPSA with immunoassays (24)(25)(33). The present study thus is the first to date to analyze in detail different sources of prostatic tissue for the molecular PSA forms. Immunohistochemical studies generally indicated a decreased PSA immunoreactivity in PCa tissue compared with benign prostatic tissue. In addition, a dedifferentiation of PCa was found to be associated with a decrease in PSA staining (28)(31). These findings are only partly consistent with quantitative PSA values determined by ELISA techniques in corresponding tissue extracts (24)(33)(34). For example, Pretlow et al. (24) found a decreased PSA content in tumor tissue but did not find relationships between tissue PSA content and the cell differentiation, as Stege et al. (33) did. Our data also showed significant differences between the PSA contents in cancerous and noncancerous parts of the prostate, but no association of tissue PSA concentration with the tumor grade was observed. For a long time, Stege et al. (33) and Pousette et al. (34) recommended tissue PSA as good predictor of the outcome of PCa. However, a recent study showing even higher concentrations of PSA in malignant tissue and no significant differences of tissue PSA in well, moderately, and poorly differentiated PCa tissue challenges these data (25). The reasons for these differences observed between PSA histochemistry and ELISA measurements are not known (24), but it may be easier to relate PSA staining to tumor differentiation when using immunohistochemistry than when measuring PSA in extracts from macroscopic tissue samples. In addition to these contradictory data, the quite variable and overlapping PSA values presumably caused by PSA heterogeneity in malignant prostatic tissue makes it difficult to use tissue PSA as diagnostic marker.

In summary, the amounts of tPSA and the isoforms fPSA, ACT-PSA, and cPSA in prostatic tissue specimens explains neither the concentrations of these analytes in serum nor the characteristics of the fPSA/tPSA ratio in patients with BPH and PCa. In addition, the determination of these analytes in prostatic tissue does not seem to possess diagnostic significance.


   Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ju 365/2-1). We are grateful to Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, and Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany, for providing PSA test kits free of charge. We thank Ines Baumert, Sabine Becker, Silke Klotzek, Katrin Krüger, and Silvia Wagenknecht for valuable technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: PSA, prostate-specific antigen; tPSA, total PSA, both free and complexed forms; ACT, {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin; fPSA, free, noncomplexed form of PSA; PCa, prostate cancer; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; cPSA, complexed form of PSA; and SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Lilja H, Christensson A, Dahlen U, Matikainen MT, Nilsson O, Pettersson K, Lövgren T. Prostate-specific antigen in serum occurs predominantly in complex with {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin. Clin Chem 1991;37:1618-1625. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Stenman UH, Leinonen J, Alfthan H, Rannikko S, Tuhkanen K, Alfthan O. A complex between prostate-specific antigen and {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin is the major form of prostate-specific antigen in serum of patients with prostatic cancer: assay of the complex improves clinical sensitivity for cancer. Cancer Res 1991;51:222-226. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Polascik TJ, Oesterling JE, Partin AW. Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery—what we have learned and where we are going. J Urol 1999;162:293-306. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Meyer A, Jung K, Lein M, Schnorr D, Loening SA. Factors influencing the ratio of free to total prostate specific antigen in serum. Int J Cancer 1997;74:630-636. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Woodrum DL, Brawer MK, Partin AW, Catalona WJ, Southwick PC. Interpretation of free prostate specific antigen clinical research studies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 1998;159:5-12. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Stenman U-H. Prostate-specific antigen, clinical use and staging: an overview. Br J Urol 1997;79(Suppl 1):53-60.
  7. Björk T, Bjartell A, Abrahamsson P-A, Hulkko S, di Sant’Agnese A, Lilja H. {alpha}1-Antichymotrypsin production in PSA-producing cells is common in prostate cancer but rare in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1994;43:427-434. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Chen Z, Chen H, Stamey TA. Prostate specific antigen in benign prostatic hyperplasia: purification and characterization. J Urol 1997;157:2166-2170. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Huber PR, Schmid HP, Mattarelli G, Strittmatter B, Vansteenbrugge GJ, Maurer A. Serum free prostate specific antigen: isoenzymes in benign hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate. Prostate 1995;27:212-219. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Allard WJ, Zhou Z, Yeung KK. Novel immunoassay for the measurement of complexed prostate-specific antigen in serum. Clin Chem 1998;44:1216-1223. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Jung K, Brux B, Lein M, Knäbich A, Sinha P, Rudolph B, et al. Determination of {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin-PSA complex in serum does not improve the differentiation between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer compared to total PSA and percentage free PSA. Urology 1999;53:1160-1168. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembling of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:680-685. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Dunn MJ. Determination of total protein concentration. Harris ELV Angal S eds. Protein purification methods 1992:10-18 IRL Press Oxford. .
  14. Labarca C, Paigen K. A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 1980;102:344-352. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry. Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1983;21:709-720. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Zhou AM, Tewari PC, Bluestein BI, Caldwell GW, Larsen FL. Multiple forms of prostate-specific antigen in serum: differences in immunorecognition by monoclonal and polyclonal assays. Clin Chem 1993;39:2483-2491. [Abstract]
  17. Zhang WM, Leinonen J, Kalkkinen N, Dowell B, Stenman UH. Purification and characterization of different molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen in human seminal fluid. Clin Chem 1995;41:1567-1573. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Chu LF, Chen Z, Stamey TA. Different molecular forms of uncomplexed prostate specific antigen (PSA) show similar immunoreactivities. J Urol 1999;161:2009-2012. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Charrier J-P, Tournel C, Michel S, Dalbon P, Jolivet M. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of prostate-specific antigen in sera of men with prostate cancer or benign prostate hyperplasia. Electrophoresis 1999;20:1075-1081. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Van Sande M, Van Camp K. {alpha}1-Antitrypsin, {alpha}2-macroglobulin and complement C4 in human benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Res 1983;11:275-277. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Zhang WM, Finne P, Leinonen J, Vesalainen S, Nordling S, Stenman U-H. Measurement of the complex between prostate-specific antigen and {alpha}1-protease inhibitor in serum. Clin Chem 1999;45:814-821. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Igawa M, Urakami S, Shiina H, Ishibe T, Shirane T, Usui T, Chodak GW. Immunohistochemical evaluation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, prostate-specific antigen and {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin in human prostate cancer. Br J Urol 1996;77:107-112. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Christensson A, Laurell CB, Lilja H. Enzymatic activity of prostate-specific antigen and its reactions with extracellular serine proteinase inhibitors. Eur J Biochem 1990;194:755-763. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Pretlow TG, Pretlow TP, Yang B, Kaetzel CS, Delmoro CM, Kamis SM, et al. Tissue concentrations of prostate-specific antigen in prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Cancer 1991;49:645-649. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Culkin DJ, Gelder FB, Mata JA, Zitman RI, Venable DD. Cellular PSA in benign and malignant prostate. Prostate 1995;26:1-4. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Blijenberg BG, Storm BN, Kruger Boeken AE, Schröder FH. On the standardisation of total prostate-specific antigen: an exercise with two reference preparations. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:545-552. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Wu JT. Assay for prostate specific antigen (PSA): problems and possible solutions. J Clin Lab Anal 1994;8:51-62. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Abrahamsson P-A, Lilja H, Falkmer S, Wadström LB. Immunohistochemical distribution of the three predominant secretory proteins in the parenchyma of hyperplastic and neoplastic prostate glands. Prostate 1988;12:39-46. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Henttu P, Lukkarinen O, Vihko P. Expression of the gene coding for human prostate-specific antigen and related hGK-1 in benign and malignant tumors of the human prostate. Int J Cancer 1990;45:654-660. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Gallee MP, Visser dJ, van der Korput JA, van der Kwast TH, ten Kate FJ, Schroeder FH, Trapman J. Variation of prostate-specific antigen expression in different tumour growth patterns present in prostatectomy specimens. Urol Res 1990;18:181-187. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Hakalahti L, Vihko P, Henttu P, Autio HH, Soini Y, Vihko R. Evaluation of PAP and PSA gene expression in prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma using northern-blot analyses, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical stainings with monoclonal and bispecific antibodies. Int J Cancer 1993;55:590-597. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Berner A, Waere H, Nesland JM, Paus E, Danielsen HE, Fossa SD. DNA ploidy, serum prostate specific antigen, histological grade and immunohistochemistry as predictive parameters of lymph node metastases in T1–T3/M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Urol 1995;75:26-32. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Stege RH, Tribukait B, Carlstrom KA, Grande M, Pousette AH. Tissue PSA from fine-needle biopsies of prostatic carcinoma as related to serum PSA, clinical stage, cytological grade, and DNA ploidy. Prostate 1999;38:183-188. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Pousette A, Carlström K, Tribukait B, Grande M, Engström A-H, Henriksson P, Stege R. Prostate-specific antigen in tissue from fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Br J Urol 1997;79(Suppl 1):104-106.



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Sterbis, C. Gao, B. Furusato, Y. Chen, S. Shaheduzzaman, L. Ravindranath, D. J. Osborn, I. L. Rosner, A. Dobi, D. G. McLeod, et al.
Higher Expression of the Androgen-Regulated Gene PSA/HK3 mRNA in Prostate Cancer Tissues Predicts Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 758 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. W. Roddam, C. P. Price, N. E. Allen, and A. M. Ward
Assessing the Clinical Impact of Prostate-Specific Antigen Assay Variability and Nonequimolarity: A Simulation Study Based on the Population of the United Kingdom
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2004; 50(6): 1012 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. D. Mikolajczyk, W. J. Catalona, C. L. Evans, H. J. Linton, L. S. Millar, K. M. Marker, D. Katir, A. Amirkhan, and H. G. Rittenhouse
Proenzyme Forms of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum Improve the Detection of Prostate Cancer
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2004; 50(6): 1017 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
W. A. Colburn
Biomarkers in Drug Discovery and Development: From Target Identification through Drug Marketing
J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 1, 2003; 43(4): 329 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. V. Obiezu, A. Soosaipillai, K. Jung, C. Stephan, A. Scorilas, D. H. C. Howarth, and E. P. Diamandis
Detection of Human Kallikrein 4 in Healthy and Cancerous Prostatic Tissues by Immunofluorometry and Immunohistochemistry
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2002; 48(8): 1232 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. H. Cazares, B.-L. Adam, M. D. Ward, S. Nasim, P. F. Schellhammer, O. J. Semmes, and G. L. Wright Jr.
Normal, Benign, Preneoplastic, and Malignant Prostate Cells Have Distinct Protein Expression Profiles Resolved by Surface Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 8(8): 2541 - 2552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
M. A. Serdar, O. Oguz, A. Olgun, B. Seckin, S. Ilgan, A. Hasimi, M. Salih, F. Peker, and T. Kutluay
Diagnostic Approach to Prostate Cancer using Total Prostate Specific Antigen-Based Parameters Together
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2002; 32(1): 22 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Wiese, Y. Belosludtsev, T. Powdrill, P. Thompson, and M. Hogan
Simultaneous Multianalyte ELISA Performed on a Microarray Platform
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2001; 47(8): 1451 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Stephan, K. Jung, M. Lein, P. Sinha, D. Schnorr, and S. A. Loening
Molecular Forms of Prostate-specific Antigen and Human Kallikrein 2 as Promising Tools for Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2000; 9(11): 1133 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Nurmikko, V. Vaisanen, T. Piironen, S. Lindgren, H. Lilja, and K. Pettersson
Production and Characterization of Novel Anti-Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Monoclonal Antibodies That Do Not Detect Internally Cleaved Lys145-Lys146 Inactive PSA
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2000; 46(10): 1610 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jung, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS