|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Childrens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Departments of
2
Clinical Laboratories and
3
Cardiology, University of Damascus Hospitals, Damascus,
Syria.
4
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, School of
Pharmacy, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Childrens Hospital, Department of Laboratory Medicine, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. E-mail rifai{at}a1.tch.harvard.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: In the present study, three newly commercially available assays and one in-house HPLC assay for total homocysteine (tHcy) were utilized in 99 subjects with angiographically documented atherosclerosis and in 91 community controls matched by age, gender, and smoking history. The in-house assay, a modified Fortin and Genest HPLC method, was compared with the Bio-Rad HPLC assay, the Abbott IMx® fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and a Bio-Rad enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) microtiter method.
Results: Correlation coefficient values between the in-house HPLC assay and the Bio-Rad HPLC, the Abbott IMx, and the Bio-Rad EIA assays were 0.95, 0.96 and 0.90, respectively. Although tHcy concentrations were higher in cases compared with controls by all four methods, the difference reached statistical significance only with the in-house HPLC procedure (median, 13.5 ± 6.7 µmol/L in cases vs 10.9 ± 4.8 µmol/L in controls; P <0.01, adjusting for covariates), where it was an independent predictor of case or control status, along with hypertension, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. The tHcy distributions in cases and controls demonstrated significant overlap. The number of atherosclerotic major coronary vessels was associated with significantly higher tHcy (P <0.01 for trend) in all four methods.
Conclusions: The three commercial assays for tHcy differed in analytical and clinical performance. Analytically, the Abbott IMx method showed the best comparability with the in-house assay, but clinically, the three commercial methods were similar and did not distinguish cases from controls.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some of these inconsistencies may be attributed to differences in methodologies. Hcy exists in several major forms (free Hcy, homocystine, mixed disulfides involving Hcy, homocysteine thiolactone, and protein-bound Hcy). A variety of methods have been utilized in the literature to measure the fasting or post methionine-loading concentrations of some or all of these potentially atherogenic variants. Most recent studies have focused on the measurement of fasting tHcy, the sum of these free and protein-bound moieties of Hcy. In the present study, we evaluate the relationship between tHcy and coronary artery disease by utilizing three newly commercially available assays and our in-house HPLC assay in patients with angiographically documented coronary atherosclerosis and in appropriate controls.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All subjects underwent a comprehensive history and physical examination
by a physician and completed a questionnaire. None of the subjects had
uremic renal disease or used anticonvulsants. Controls had no prior
history of CHD or symptoms compatible with angina pectoris and had
normal resting electrocardiograms. Hypertension was defined as resting
systolic blood pressure
160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure
95
mmHg. Diabetes mellitus was established by prior diagnosis, a fasting
blood glucose of >1200 mg/L, or a glycosylated hemoglobin
concentration >6%.
Blood samples were collected after a 12-h fast for the determination of total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, and tHcy. In cases, samples were obtained on the day before the angiography. Blood specimens containing EDTA were placed on ice within 10 min of collection, and blood specimens containing no anticoagulant were allowed to clot for ~30 min. Serum and plasma samples were subsequently centrifuged at 2000g in a refrigerated centrifuge for 15 min and stored at -70 °C until analysis. Serum samples were used for the measurement of lipids and lipoproteins at the University of Damascus Hospitals, and plasma EDTA samples were used for the determination of tHcy at Childrens Hospital in Boston. Analysts were blinded to the identity of the samples, which were coded and run anonymously with alternating cases and controls. Cholesterol and triglycerides were measured on a Hitachi 911 automated analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturers recommendations. Triglyceride measurements were corrected for endogenous glycerol. HDL-C was measured after phosphotungstic acid-MgCl2 precipitation (Roche Diagnostics). LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was estimated using the Friedewald equation.
The in-house HPLC assay is a modification of the method of Fortin and Genest (7). Briefly, the Hcy, mixed-disulfide, and protein-bound Hcy in 120 µL of sample were reduced to free Hcy with tri-n-butylphosphine. After protein precipitation with perchloric acid, the preparation underwent derivatization with ammonium 7-fluorobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole-4 sulfonate. tHcy was measured photometrically after separation with a reversed-phase column. The in-house method demonstrated run-to-run interassay imprecision (CVs) of 5.8%, 7.5%, and 3.9% for 18 samples at each of tHcy concentrations of 9, 34, and 59 µmol/L, respectively.
The three commercially available assays were performed according to
manufacturers recommendations. We compared our assay with the Bio-Rad
HPLC Hcy assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories). In this assay, 50 µL
of sample is subjected to reduction and derivatization with a
water-soluble trialkylphosphine and a fluorescent thiospecific dye
(ABD-F), respectively. After precipitation of protein with
trichloroacetic acid, the supernatant is injected on a reversed-phase
column heated to 45 °C. tHcy is detected fluorometrically
(
ex, 385 nm;
em, 515
nm). The run-to-run CVs (n = 18) for the Bio-Rad HPLC were 7.7%
and 3.8% at tHcy concentrations of 8 and 30 µmol/L, respectively.
The Abbott IMx® homocysteine assay (Abbott Laboratories) is a fully automated, fluorescence polarization immunoassay. This assay involves the initial reduction of Hcy, mixed-disulfide, and protein-bound Hcy to free Hcy with dithiothreitol, followed by conversion to S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH) by bovine SAH hydrolase and excess adenosine. After mouse monoclonal SAH antibody is added to the prepared sample, S-adenosyl-L-cysteine fluorescein tracer is added, which competes with SAH for antibody binding sites. Finally, tHcy is quantified by the intensity of the polarized fluorescent light measured by the IMx optical assembly. Run-to-run CVs (n = 22) were 2.9%, 0.8%, and 1.7% at tHcy concentrations of 7, 12.5, and 25 µmol/L, respectively.
The Bio-Rad (Axis®) enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) is a microtiter assay that involves four steps: (a) reduction of Hcy, mixed disulfides, and protein-bound forms of Hcy to free Hcy by dithiothreitol; (b) conversion of free Hcy and adenosine to SAH by bovine SAH hydrolase; (c) competitive binding of sample SAH and immobilized SAH with monoclonal mouse anti-SAH, and spectrophotometric measurement of peroxidase activity after the addition of anti-mouse antibody labeled with horseradish peroxidase. Run-to-run CVs (n = 15) for the Bio-Rad EIA procedure were 11% and 8.1% at mean tHcy concentrations of 6.43 and 25.6 µmol/L, respectively.
The study protocol was approved by the Committee on the Protection of Human Subjects of the University of Damascus and informed consents were obtained from all participants.
statistical methods
The results for gaussian distributed data are reported as
means ± SD. Because tHcy and triglyceride distributions were
skewed rightward, their values are expressed as medians ± SD and
were natural log-transformed to normalize the data for subsequent
analyses. The remaining variables are expressed as means ± SD.
tHcy bias is calculated as the test method minus the in-house method.
Using previously published Hcy studies (4)(5)(6), we estimated
that there was 90% power (
= 0.05, two-sided) to find a 1.6
µmol/L difference in Hcy between cases and controls. Case-control
differences were evaluated with the unpaired Student t-test
and a general linear model to adjust for covariates. Pearson
correlation coefficients and linear regression with least-squares
method were used to evaluate correlations between patient
characteristics, the tHcy assays, and the other analytes. To define
independent predictors of case and control status, we used stepwise,
forward logistic regression with a model that included age, gender,
diabetes, smoking, hypertension, lipids, and tHcy.
All P are two-tailed with P <0.05 regarded as statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SPSS 9.0 (SPSS Inc.).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Correlations between our in-house method and the commercially available assays were generally good. Compared with the in-house procedure (x), the following linear regression equations and correlations were observed: Abbott IMx, y = 0.96x + 1.19 (r = 0.96; P <0.0001); Bio-Rad HPLC, y = 0.81x + 1.38 (r = 0.95; P <0.0001); and Bio-Rad EIA, y = 0.95x + 1.66 (r = 0.90; P <0.0001). Weak correlations were noted between the HDL-C and the Abbott IMx tHcy (r = -0.14; P = 0.06), Bio-Rad HPLC tHcy (r = -0.16; P = 0.03), and Bio-Rad EIA tHcy (r = -0.16; P = 0.03), but not with the in-house method (r = -0.11; P = 0.14).
Mean tHcy bias was 0.59 ± 1.74 µmol/L for the Abbott IMx,
-1.21 ± 2.03 µmol/L for the Bio-Rad HPLC, and 1.01 ±
2.76 µmol/L for the Bio-Rad EIA. LDL-C was weakly correlated with
Abbott IMx bias (r = -0.21; P = 0.005)
and Bio-Rad EIA bias (r = 0.19; P =
0.01). The mean of the in-house method and comparison method was
positively correlated with Bio-Rad HPLC bias (r =
-0.436; P <0.001) but not with the Bio-Rad EIA
(r = 0.125; P = 0.85) or Abbott IMx
biases (Fig. 1
). The Bio-Rad HPLC method tended to overestimate tHcy at low
concentrations and underestimate tHcy at higher concentrations compared
with the in-house assay.
|
We compared the tHcy measured with the four assays in the study groups.
tHcy in case subjects was significantly higher than in control subjects
only when measured with the in-house HPLC assay (P =
0.01) after controlling for age, gender, smoking, diabetes,
hypertension, and lipids (Table 2
). When cases were classified into quartiles derived from tHcy
of controls, cases demonstrated an increased likelihood of being in the
top two quartiles compared with the lower two quartiles in all assays
(Fig. 2
). In nondiabetic subjects, tHcy (in-house HPLC), hypertension,
cholesterol, and triglycerides were independent predictors of case or
control status.
|
|
Overall, male subjects had significantly higher tHcy concentrations than did women with the in-house HPLC (12.9 µmol/L for men vs 10.8 µmol/L for women; P <0.05), Bio-Rad HPLC (11.6 vs 9.5 µmol/L; P <0.05), and Abbott IMx (13.4 vs 12.1 µmol/L; P <0.05) in univariate analysis. In the control group, men had significantly higher tHcy than women for all assays: in-house HPLC, 11.1 µmol/L for male controls vs 10.3 µmol/L for female controls (P = 0.045); Bio-Rad HPLC, 11.3 vs 9.3 µmol/L (P = 0.02); Abbott IMx, 12.5 vs 9.9 µmol/L (P = 0.02); Bio-Rad EIA, 13.7 vs 11.6 µmol/L (P = 0.03). However, these differences were no longer statistically significant when adjusted for influence of age, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and lipids. In the case subjects, there were no significant gender differences in tHcy.
Compared with male controls, male cases had significantly higher total cholesterol (2350 vs 2080 mg/L, respectively; P = 0.001), triglycerides (2140 vs 1550 mg/L, respectively; P <0.001), and in-house HPLC tHcy (13.8 vs 11.1 µmol/L, respectively; P = 0.02). Although not statistically significant, tHcy was also higher in female cases compared with controls: in-house, 10.8 µmol/L vs 10.3 µmol/L (P = 0.11); Bio-Rad HPLC, 10.6 vs 9.3 µmol/L (P = 0.14); Abbott IMx, 12.4 vs 9.9 µmol/L (P = 0.15); Bio-Rad EIA, 12.9 vs 11.6 µmol/L (P = 0.25). Triglycerides were higher in female cases vs controls (1590 vs 1000 mg/L, respectively; P = 0.001).
Active smoking appeared to be associated with higher tHcy with the Bio-Rad EIA (14.2 µmol/L for smokers vs 12.2 µmol/L for nonsmokers; P <0.05) but not in the other assays. Hypertensive subjects also had higher triglycerides (2140 mg/L for hypertensives vs 1570 mg/L for normotensives; P = 0.028). These differences were not statistically significant after controlling for the effects of potential covariates. In subjects with atherosclerosis, diabetic status was not associated with significantly different tHcy or lipids.
We next examined the tHcy concentrations in subjects with different
numbers of major coronary vessels affected by atherosclerosis (Table 2
). An increased number of diseased coronary arteries was associated
with increased tHcy in all assays (P = 0.003 for
Bio-Rad EIA and P <0.001 for others for positive linear
trend). Subjects with two-vessel CHD had higher tHcy than those with
one-vessel involvement (in-house, P = 0.007; Abbott
IMx, P = 0.014; Bio-Rad HPLC, P =
0.004; Bio-Rad EIA, P = 0.051). tHcy in subjects with
three-vessel disease was significantly higher subjects with than
one-vessel disease (in-house, P = 0.0004; Abbott IMx,
P = 0.0002; Bio-Rad HPLC, P = 0.0001;
Bio-Rad EIA, P = 0.007), but not significantly higher
than subjects with two-vessel CHD. Subjects with one-vessel CHD did not
have significantly increased tHcy compared with controls. However,
three-vessel CHD was associated with significantly higher tHcy compared
with controls with all assays. tHcy was higher in two-vessel CHD
subjects than in controls only with the in-house HPLC method.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Defining normal and abnormal ranges for tHcy maybe problematic when
(a) physiological concentrations of cases and controls show
a great deal of overlap, (b) no gold standard or reference
method has been established, and (c) some variability exists
between assays. Genetic variations also influence the cardiovascular
risk associated with hyperhomocysteinemia. Approximately 40% and 12%
of the white male population are heterozygous and homozygous,
respectively, for the MTHFR mutation
(677C
T), which leads to mild-to-moderately increased tHcy,
particularly when plasma folate concentrations are low
(8)(9). Moreover, the results of several
studies, including a recent metaanalysis (10), indicate that
this mutation does not independently increase cardiovascular risk. The
prevalence of the MTHFR mutation in our study population or
its relative distribution between controls and cases is not known. Mean
and median tHcy concentrations were slightly higher than those reported
previously in adult American males (11)(12).
With the in-house assay, 75% and 60% of the case and control
subjects, respectively, had tHcy considered to be increased by current
standards (tHcy
10 µmol/L). Therefore, tHcy reference ranges
derived from one population may not be valid in other populations.
Given the significant overlap in fasting tHcy between controls and
subjects with documented CHD, the varying prevalence of such
polymorphisms in study populations may influence the observed
relationships between tHcy and cardiovascular disease.
Although tHcy was statistically increased only in the in-house HPLC method, all assays demonstrated a positive trend for tHcy as coronary involvement increased. In subjects with three-vessel coronary artery disease, tHcy was significantly higher than in controls with all three assays. This is consistent with prior studies that also demonstrated higher tHcy in multivessel CHD compared with single-vessel disease (13) and in subjects with a higher coronary score of overall severity (14). In addition, a graded relationship between hyperhomocysteinemia and extracoronary atherosclerosis has also been demonstrated. For example, significant correlations have been noted between the Hcy concentration and the degree of carotid intimal-medial wall-thickening (15), the severity of lower-limb peripheral vascular disease (16), and the number of vascular sites affected by atherosclerosis [i.e., coronary, cerebral, or peripheral arteries (14)]. Therefore, higher tHcy is associated with greater systemic atherosclerosis.
Folate and vitamin B6 consumption can decrease Hcy concentrations and are associated with decreased risk of atherosclerosis (6)(17)(18), with substantial risk reduction observed at a folate intake of ~400 µg/day in women (18). In response to data supporting the relationship between neural tube birth defects and folate deficiency and demonstrating the failure of >30% of adults over age 20 to meet the prior US Department of Agriculture recommended dietary allowance of folate (19)(20), the US Department of Agriculture began mandating fortification of cereal grains in 1998 and recently increased the recommended dietary allowance to 600 µg/day for pregnant women and 400 µg/day for the general adult population (21). Fortification may lead to average increases of folate intake by ~100 µg/day; however, whether this will lead to significant reductions in Hcy in subjects at highest risk for cardiovascular disease has yet to be determined. In addition, because of the difficulty in discriminating which subjects are at risk from hyperhomocysteinemia and defining what constitutes abnormal tHcy concentrations, selective targeting of treatment with folate and vitamin B6 may prove challenging. If prospective data suggest cardiovascular benefit from folate, B6, and/or B12 supplementation, probably more aggressive fortification of the US diet maybe indicated for the primary prevention of CHD.
Limitations in the present study merit consideration. With the comparison assays, differences between cases and controls might have achieved statistical significance with a larger sample size. The presence of occult coronary disease in our controls could not be excluded and may have attenuated the differences demonstrated between the groups. Therefore, more stringent evaluation of controls likely would have enhanced the encountered differences. In addition, we had an unexpected absence of diabetics in our control group. However, no statistical heterogeneity was found between nondiabetic and diabetic cases, and analyses when diabetics were excluded were consistent with when diabetics were included. Other studies have demonstrated no significant differences in tHcy between diabetics compared with nondiabetics when controlling for other potential covariates (11). Finally, we are unable to comment on gender-specific differences, although a larger sample size might produce a statistically significant difference between female cases and controls. Previous studies have demonstrated substantially higher tHcy concentrations in men (22)(23), however. As a result, separate reference ranges based on sex have been proposed (24).
| Supplemental Information |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In conclusion, although increasing severity of coronary involvement was associated with significantly higher tHcy for all assays, three of the four methods failed to detect statistically significant differences between subjects with coronary disease and controls. The present study demonstrates that the clinical applicability of tHcy testing may be hampered by assay variability, the lack of an accepted reference method, and the influence of patient characteristics on Hcy concentrations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
R. Obeid, M. Jouma, and W. Herrmann Cobalamin Status (Holo-Transcobalamin, Methylmalonic Acid) and Folate as Determinants of Homocysteine Concentration Clin. Chem., November 1, 2002; 48(11): 2064 - 2065. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Albert, J. Ma, N. Rifai, M. J. Stampfer, and P. M. Ridker Prospective Study of C-Reactive Protein, Homocysteine, and Plasma Lipid Levels as Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Death Circulation, June 4, 2002; 105(22): 2595 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Hortin, P. Sullivan, and G. Csako Relationships among Plasma Homocysteine, Cysteine, and Albumin Concentrations: Potential Utility of Assessing the Cysteine/Homocysteine Ratio Clin. Chem., June 1, 2001; 47(6): 1121 - 1124. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |