|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Human Metabolism, Dallas, TX 75235.
2
Center for Human Nutrition, and Department
of Pathology and Internal Medicine, Dallas, TX 75235.
3
University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Human Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., CS3.114, Dallas, TX 75235-9073. Fax 214-648-8037; e-mail jialal.i{at}pathology.swmed.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Using an immunoaffinity assay, we measured RLP-C concentrations in 48 type 2 diabetic patients with (n = 24) and without (n = 24) macrovascular complications, and 24 age- and gender-matched controls, as well as in 38 ESRD patients on hemodialysis (n = 19) and peritoneal dialysis (n = 19), and 19 age- and gender-matched controls.
Results: RLP-C correlated significantly with plasma triglycerides (TGs; r = 0.8). When compared with controls, RLP-C concentrations were significantly higher in type 2 diabetic patients with and without macrovascular complications (median, 0.22 and 0.17 mmol/L vs 0.14 mmol/L; P <0.0002 and <0.01, respectively); diabetic patients with macrovascular complications also had significantly higher RLP-C than diabetic patients without macrovascular complications (P <0.05). However, when RLP-C/TG ratios were computed, only diabetic patients with macrovascular complications showed significantly higher RLP-C/TG ratios compared with controls (P <0.05). Regarding ESRD, RLP-C concentrations were significantly increased in patients on both hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis compared with controls (median, 0.23 and 0.21 mmol/L vs 0.13 mmol/L; P <0.0001). Whereas RLP-C was increased in ESRD patients on hemodialysis with TGs <2.26 mmol/L compared with controls, RLP-C/TG ratios were not significantly increased in these patients.
Conclusions: Type 2 diabetic patients with macrovascular disease demonstrated increased RLP-C and RLP-C/TG ratios, whereas ESRD patients showed only increased RLP-C concentrations.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have implicated IDL concentrations with increased incidence or recurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (9)(10)(11)(12). Increased IDL also has been found in diseases associated with accelerated or premature atherosclerosis, such as type III dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, and familial hypercholesterolemia (12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Ultracentrifugation and nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis methods have been used to separate small VLDL and IDL particles (13)(14)(15)(16)(17), but these methods are tedious and time-consuming and hence have limited applicability in clinical laboratories. Thus, development of simple and reliable methods for measurement of remnants for routine clinical laboratories is imperative.
The recent development by Nakajima et al. (18) of an immunoseparation method for measurement of remnant-like particles has allowed for a simpler routine method. In this assay, anti-human A1 and a unique apo B-100 mouse monoclonal antibody (J1-H) conjugated to Sepharose 4B removes HDL, chylomicrons, LDL, and most VLDL. The J1-H antibody does not recognize apo E-rich VLDL particles and TRLs containing apo B-48. Thus, chylomicron remnants and a fraction of VLDL enriched in apo E remain in the unbound fraction. These remnant-like particles (RLPs) are quantified by measuring cholesterol and TGs enzymatically in the unbound fraction.
With this assay, plasma RLP concentrations have been found to be significantly increased in patients with CAD compared with matched controls, and threefold increased concentrations have been demonstrated in type III dyslipidemia, a prototypic disorder of remnant metabolism (19)(20)(21). To date, there is little information with regard to RLP-cholesterol (RLP-C) concentrations in patients with diabetes and ESRD patients in American populations. In Asian populations, especially in those of Japanese ancestry, increased RLP-C, when compared with controls, has been reported in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes (22)(23) and in ESRD patients on hemodialysis (HD) (24)(25). In the present US-based population study, we evaluated RLP-C concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients with and without macrovascular complications and in patients with ESRD on HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with controls.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
rlp-c assay
For the RLP-C assay (18)(27), 300 µL of
the immunoaffinity gel containing antibodies to apo A1 and B-100 were
pipetted into separation cups containing steel balls and placed in a
magnetic mixer manufactured by Otsuka Electronics. After the
gel was allowed to settle for 5 min, 5 µL of blank (buffer),
controls, or plasma was pipetted onto the surface of the gel and
incubated with continuous mixing for 2 h at room temperature.
After incubation, the gel was allowed to settle for 15 min, and 200
µL of the supernatant was placed into sample cups. Cholesterol
concentrations were then measured using a peroxidase-based assay on the
Cobas Mira S automatic analyzer (Roche Diagnostic Systems). The
intra- and interassay precision (CVs <5%) has been reported
previously (19).
rlp-c measurements in diabetic subjects
The diabetic subjects were recruited from the diabetic clinic at
Parkland Memorial Hospital and divided into two groups: (a)
type 2 diabetic patients without macrovascular complications (n =
24), and (b) type 2 diabetic patients with macrovascular
complications (n = 24). Age- and sex-matched healthy controls
(n = 24) formed a third group. The criteria for macrovascular
disease in diabetic patients included evidence of cardiovascular
disease (clinical presentation and electrocardiographic evidence of
myocardial infarction, positive stress tests, or coronary angiography),
cerebrovascular disease (stroke, transient ischemic attacks, or
magnetic resonance imaging evidence), or peripheral vascular disease
(amputation, intermittent claudication, evidence of vascular disease
with color-flow Doppler by B-mode ultrasound, amputation, or
ankle-brachial index <0.8 and toe pressures <45 mmHg)
(28). All subjects in the first group had no clinical
evidence of atherosclerosis and normal baseline
electrocardiograms. There were no significant differences in
age, male/female ratio, and body mass index (BMI) among the three
groups (Table 1
). In this study, 40% were African-American, 44% were
Caucasian, 1% were Asian, and 15% were Hispanic. Fasting blood
samples were collected in EDTA tubes and stored at 4 °C. RLP-C
concentrations in the plasma were determined within 5 days of
collection.
|
rlp-c measurements in esrd subjects
ESRD patients on HD (n = 19) and PD (n = 19) were
recruited from the Renal Dialysis Unit at Parkland Memorial Hospital.
Less than one-third were diagnosed with diabetes. Healthy controls
(n = 19) formed the third group. The three groups were matched for
age, gender, BMI, and racial background. In this study, 39% were
African-American, 43% were Caucasian, and 18% were Hispanic. Causes
of ESRD and exclusion criteria for the subjects have been described
previously [Ref. (29) and Table 2
]. Fasting blood samples were drawn before initiation of
dialysis for HD patients. RLP-C concentrations were measured in fasting
plasma as described above.
|
statistics
The KruskalWallis nonparametric test was used to assess overall
differences between the groups. Differences within groups were compared
by the Wilcoxon sign-rank test. Spearman rank correlation coefficients
were used to assess relationships between RLP-C and lipid
concentrations. Significance was set at <0.05. Analyses were performed
using SAS (SAS Institute).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
rlp-c concentrations in diabetic subjects
The characteristics and lipid and lipoprotein profiles of controls
and diabetic patients are shown in Table 1
. No significant differences
were observed in age, gender, BMI, or lipid and lipoprotein
concentrations between the con-trol and diabetic groups for all
subjects as well as the normotriglyceridemic groups (Table 1
). The mean
RLP-C concentrations in diabetic subjects with and without
macrovascular complications and controls are shown in Table 1
. RLP-C
concentrations were significantly higher in the diabetic subjects with
and without macrovascular complications compared with controls
(P = 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). In addition,
diabetic patients with macrovascular complications had significantly
higher RLP-C concentrations compared with diabetic patients without
macrovascular complications (P <0.05). A positive
correlation was observed between RLP-C and TG concentrations for
controls (r = 0.37; P = 0.07) and
diabetic patients without (r = 0.76; P
<0.002) and with macrovascular complications (r = 0.6;
P <0.002). In normotriglyceridemic patients [TGs <2.26
mmol/L (200 mg/dL)], RLP-C concentrations in diabetic patients with
macrovascular complications were significantly higher compared with
controls (P <0.0002), despite the TG concentrations being
nonsignificant. There was a trend to significance in RLP-C
(P = 0.07) in diabetic patients without complications
compared with controls, despite TG concentrations being nonsignificant.
To further account for the effect of TGs, RLP-C/TG ratios were
computed. RLP-C/TG ratios were significantly increased only in type 2
diabetics with macrovascular complications compared with controls
(P <0.02).
rlp-c concentrations in esrd subjects
The subject characteristics and lipid and lipoprotein profiles of
controls and ESRD patients on dialysis are shown in Table 2
. Dialysis
subjects in both HD and PD groups had significantly higher plasma TG
and lower HDL-C concentrations compared with controls. The mean RLP-C
values in the HD, PD, and control groups are shown in Table 2
. Both
dialysis groups showed significantly higher RLP-C concentrations
compared with controls (P <0.0001); however, there were no
significant differences in RLP-C concentrations between the two
dialysis groups (P >0.05). A strong positive correlation
was observed between RLP-C and TG concentrations for controls and
dialysis patients (r = 0.7 and 0.9, respectively;
P <0.001). Because both dialysis groups had significantly
higher TG values compared with controls, RLP-C concentrations in
normotriglyceridemic (TGs <2.26 mmol/L) patients were compared. In the
normotriglyceridemic group, TG values were significantly higher only in
PD patients (P <0.02) and not in HD patients compared with
controls. Thus, RLP-C concentrations were compared between the HD and
control groups. Again, RLP-C concentrations were significantly higher
for HD (0.22 ± 0.11 vs 0.14 ± 0.04 mmol/L; P
<0.05) compared with controls. However, RLP-C/TG ratios in ESRD
patients on HD and PD failed to show any significant differences
compared with controls (P >0.30).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of remnants by laborious ultracentrifugation techniques has hampered clinical studies. Thus, there is a need for more reliable methodologies. Recent development of an immunoaffinity method that uses a combination of anti-human A1 and a unique apo B-100 (J1-H) mouse monoclonal antibody has allowed routine isolation of chylomicron remnants and small VLDL enriched in apo E. Studies using this assay have confirmed the role of RLPs in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, demonstrating significantly increased RLP concentrations in normolipidemic men with CAD (19)(30), in patients with type III dyslipidemia (19)(20)(21), in sudden cardiac death (37), in vasospastic angina with nearly normal coronary arteries (38), and in patients with coronary artery restenosis after angioplasty (39). Kugiyama et al. (40) have shown that in 135 patients with CAD, patients with RLP-C concentrations in the highest tertile had a significantly higher probability of developing coronary events than did those with remnant concentrations in the lowest tertile. Furthermore, higher concentrations of remnants were a significant and independent predictor of developing coronary events in multivariate analyses that included extent of stenosis, age, sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia as covariates. Further documentation of the atherogenicity of RLPs comes from the work of Takeichi et al. (37) in age-matched cases with sudden cardiac death, with and without advanced coronary atherosclerosis. These authors showed that the RLP-C concentration was the only variable that was statistically different between the two groups.
Whereas substantial data exist that relate RLPs and CAD, few studies have addressed RLP concentrations in chronic diseases such as diabetes and ESRD. Watanabe et al. (22) observed significantly higher RLP-C concentrations in Asian patients with impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes compared with controls with no marked differences in total cholesterol or LDL-C. However, although TG concentrations were higher in the diabetic groups and correlated well with RLP-C (r = 0.95), the RLP-C/TG ratio was not reported and the authors did not correct for the increased TGs. Shimizu et al. (23) reported increased RLP-C in type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria compared with those without albuminuria. However, no control population was studied, and TG concentrations were significantly higher in the diabetic patients with macroalbuminuria. The present study is the first to address RLP-C concentrations in diabetic patients with and without macrovascular complications compared with controls from a US-based population. Although both diabetic groups demonstrated increased RLP-C concentrations compared with controls, diabetic patients with macrovascular complications had significantly higher concentrations than diabetic patients without macrovascular complications. Furthermore, in normotriglyceridemia as well as when the RLP-C/TG ratio was used, which is a better measure of remnant status (20), only the diabetic macrovascular complications group showed significantly higher RLP-C concentrations. Diabetic vascular complications are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity; hence, increased RLP-C concentrations in this group substantiates its atherogenic role. More importantly, no significant differences existed in the well-known atherogenic risk factors of total cholesterol and LDL-C or TGs among the three groups. Thus, RLP-C concentrations or the RLP-C/TG ratio may be a better indicator of CAD risk than cholesterol and TGs in normolipidemic type 2 diabetic populations and maybe useful in monitoring the effect of drug therapy on this atherogenic lipoprotein.
Increased TGs are the primary lipid abnormality in ESRD, possibly because of increased production and decreased clearance of TRLs, leading to accumulation of TRL remnants. The present study is the first to address RLP concentrations in ESRD patients on both HD and PD. TG concentrations in both the HD and PD groups were significantly higher than in controls (twofold), and RLP concentrations were almost threefold higher than in controls, although no significant differences existed between the HD and PD groups. Similar increases in RLP concentrations previously have been reported in Asian ESRD patients on HD (24) compared with controls. In addition, Sekihara et al. (25) have reported that patients on HD with CAD had significantly higher RLP-C concentrations than HD patients without CAD. However, the concentrations were not compared with matched controls. There appear to be no reports on RLP-C concentrations in patients with ESRD on PD. A consistent feature of RLP-C is its strong positive correlation with total TGs reported here and in the studies reported above (r = 0.8) (24)(25). However, the study by Oda et al. (24) in HD subjects did not adjust for the significantly higher TG concentrations in the HD groups compared with controls. To examine the effect of RLPs independent of TG concentrations, we evaluated the RLP-C concentrations in normotriglyceridemic dialysis patients and computed RLP-C/TG ratios. RLP-C concentrations were again significantly higher in the HD group compared with controls in spite of TG concentrations being nonsignificant. However, the RLP-C/TG ratios failed to show any significant differences. This could possibly be attributable to the small sample size. Thus, it appears that only in normolipidemic HD patients, and not in PD patients, would RLP-C concentrations be a better indicator of CAD risk than TG alone.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the dyslipidemia of diabetic patients with and without macrovascular complications and of ESRD patients on HD and PD includes increased concentrations of potentially atherogenic RLPs. Moreover, the increases were more prominent in diabetic patients with macrovascular complications and in the normotriglyceridemic HD group. However, it is probable that the nature of the atherogenic RLPs may be different between the two groups and that the diabetic subjects may possess more chylomicron remnants, whereas the ESRD subjects have more VLDL remnants, and this warrants further study. Thus, the measurement of RLP-C by a reliable immunoaffinity assay may add to the assessment of CAD risk in normolipidemic patients, and could become part of the lipoprotein profile in patients with established risk factors for CAD, if future studies confirm its utility independent of plasma TGs.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-tocopherol supplementation. Circulation 2000;in press..
-Tocopherol supplementation decreases the oxidative
susceptibility of LDL in renal failure patients on dialysis therapy.
Atherosclerosis 2000;in press..
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. Wanner, U. Bahner, R. Mattern, D. Lang, and J. Passlick-Deetjen Effect of dialysis flux and membrane material on dyslipidaemia and inflammation in haemodialysis patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2570 - 2575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Brinton, M. N. Nanjee, and P. N. Hopkins Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnant levels and metabolism: Time to adopt these orphan risk factors? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 16, 2004; 43(12): 2233 - 2235. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.B. Twickler, G.M. Dallinga-Thie, J.S. Cohn, and M.J. Chapman Elevated Remnant-Like Particle Cholesterol Concentration: A Characteristic Feature of the Atherogenic Lipoprotein Phenotype Circulation, April 27, 2004; 109(16): 1918 - 1925. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Hirowatari, H. Yoshida, H. Kurosawa, K.-i. Doumitu, and N. Tada Measurement of cholesterol of major serum lipoprotein classes by anion-exchange HPLC with perchlorate ion-containing eluent J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1404 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Campos, L. Kotite, P. Blanche, Y. Mitsugi, P. H. Frost, U. Masharani, R. M. Krauss, and R. J. Havel Properties of triglyceride-rich and cholesterol-rich lipoproteins in the remnant-like particle fraction of human blood plasma J. Lipid Res., March 1, 2002; 43(3): 365 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Chan, G. F. Watts, P. H. Barrett, J. C.L. Mamo, and T. G. Redgrave Markers of Triglyceride-rich Lipoprotein Remnant Metabolism in Visceral Obesity Clin. Chem., February 1, 2002; 48(2): 278 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Stein, S. Devaraj, D. Balis, B. Adams-Huet, and I. Jialal Effect of Statin Therapy on Remnant Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Patients With Combined Hyperlipidemia Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2001; 21(12): 2026 - 2031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |