|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Section of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Medical Diagnostic Sciences and Special Therapy, University of Padua, 35100 Padua, Italy.
2
Ludwig Boltzmann Institut für Experimentelle
Endokrinologie, A-1100 Wien, Austria.
3
Department of Anesthesia, University of Copenhagen,
DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 039-49-657391;
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ANP(99-126). In addition, cleavage of
proANP(1-98) produces proANP(1-30), proANP(31-67), and
proANP(79-98) fragments. ProANP(1-30) and proANP(31-67) have roles
in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. The aim of the present study was
to develop a plasma assay for proANP(1-30) and proANP(31-67) and to
compare results in trained athletes and sedentary subjects. Methods: Two competitive enzyme immunoassays were established with affinity-purified sheep antiserum against synthetic ANP fragments. The immunoreactivity (ir) of proANP(1-30) and proANP(31-67) was measured in 10-µL plasma samples without extraction in a microwell-based assay. Plasma concentrations in sedentary male subjects (n = 22) and male endurance athletes (n = 14) were examined.
Results: In the assay for ir-proANP(1-30) and ir-proANP(31-67), the concentrations at 95% B/B0 were 4.7 and 14.2 pmol/L, respectively. Within-run CVs were 46% and 56%, and between-run CVs were 9% for both assays. Both assays were linear on dilution (y = 0.9945x - 0.7291 and y = 1.0001x - 3.428), and the recoveries were 102112% and 102106%, respectively. In the sedentary and athletic groups, the ir-proANP(1-30) concentrations were similar: 318 ± 38 pmol/L and 312 ± 25 pmol/L (mean ± SE), respectively, whereas the ir-proANP(31-67) was higher in the rowers (713 ± 81 pmol/L) than in the sedentary subjects (387 ± 71 pmol/L; P <0.005).
Conclusions: The proANP fragment assays are precise (CV <10%) and exhibit nearly quantitative recovery (102112%). Only ir-proANP(31-67) responds to physical training.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ANP) and a second larger fragment, the N-terminal
proANP(1-98), in equimolar amounts. The N-terminal fragment is further
proteolytically cleaved in plasma to form the peptides proANP(1-30),
proANP(31-67), and proANP(79-98) (2)(3). Winters
et al. (4) suggested that both the NH2
and COOH termini of the proANP are released simultaneously with
exercise; in addition, Macauluay et al. (5) agreed that the
peptides are cosecreted from the heart. However, the metabolism of
these circulating fragments is unknown. The main stimulus for the
secretion of natriuretic peptides is atrial stress in response to
increased intracardiac volume (6)(7)(8), and their effects are
natriuresis and vasodilatation (9). The release of ANP increases in response to physical exercise (10)(11), reflecting increased venous return to the heart and perhaps the higher heart rate. Freund et al. (10) observed that, during marathon runs, the release of ANP increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner and returned to values nearer basal values by the end of the exercise.
Measurement of the N-terminal proANP requires an immunoradiometric
assay. Numata et al. (12) established a two-step assay that
uses monoclonal antibodies and synthetic N-terminal proANP(1-67).
During physical exercise, increases in the plasma
-ANP
[proANP(99-126)] concentration also suggests that atrial
proANP(1-126) synthesis increases, leading to increased formation of
all fragments. The N-terminal proANP fragments have longer half-lives
in the circulation than
-ANP, with corresponding higher plasma
concentrations. Little is known about the metabolism of proANP(1-98),
and the structures of the circulating forms are unclear. Nevertheless,
the proteolytic cleavage could be in equimolar quantities, and the
different circulating concentrations of the proANP fragments reflect
their degradation and clearance rates (13). Furthermore, the
responses of proANP peptides to various stimuli seem slow both when ANP
increases or decreases (14)(15). The aim of this
study was to develop enzymes immunoassays (EIAs) for plasma
immunoreactive (ir)-proANP(1-30) and ir-proANP(31-67) without
extraction. These new detailed EIAs were also devised to determine
whether a difference in the circulating concentrations of these
peptides exists between trained athletes and sedentary healthy
subjects.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ANP(99-126), and proANP(1-98) were purchased from
the Institute of Mikrobiologie und Genetik der Universität Wien.
A solution of biotinylated peptides with assay buffer was prepared
before each assay. Peroxidase-streptavidin was purchased from Southern
Biotechnology Associates. 3,3',5,5'-Tetramethylbenzidine
solution was purchased from Sigma. The stopping solution was 3 mol/L
sulfuric acid in distilled water.
buffers
Buffer A (for coating) was 0.05 mol/L sodium borate buffer, pH
9.6. Buffer B (for washing) was sodium phosphate-buffered saline (0.06
mol/L sodium phosphate), pH 7.4, containing 0.1 mL/L Triton
X-100. Buffer C (for blocking) was sodium phosphate-buffered saline
(0.06 mol/L sodium phosphate), pH 7.5, containing 1 g/L nonfat dried
milk (Skim Milk Powder; Fluka), 20 g/L fetal calf serum (JRH), 20 g/L
peptone (Merck), and 20 g/L Karion F (Merck). Buffer D (assay buffer)
was sodium phosphate-buffered saline (0.05 mol/L sodium phosphate), pH
7.4, containing 5 g/L bovine serum albumin.
antibodies
Donkey anti-sheep IgG Fc-specific antiserum was purchased
from Guilday. The sheep antibody against proANP(1-30) IgG and the sheep
antibody against proANP(31-67) IgG were purified by immunoaffinity
chromatography on HiTrap minicolumns (Pharmacia) according to the
protocol of the manufacturer. In brief, 0.5 mg of each peptide was
bound to the column. The immunogen was column-coupled using 1 mL of the
ligand solution (0.5 g/L immunogen in 0.2 mol/L sodium bicarbonate and
0.5 mol/L sodium chloride, pH 8.3). After the column was washed and
non-coupled active groups were deactivated, 10 mL of the
proANP-specific antiserum (diluted 1:2 in 50 mmol/L sodium borate
buffer, pH 7.0) was loaded (0.5 mL/min) onto the column at room
temperature. After suitable column washing, the proANP-specific
antibody was eluted with sodium citrate buffer (100 mmol/L pH 1.7).
Fractions (0.5 mL) were collected in tubes containing 0.5 mL of 500
mmol/L sodium borate buffer (pH 10.0) for immediate neutralization. The
protein concentrations of the eluted IgG-containing fractions were
determined with a commercial protein assay (Pierce).
microtiter plates
Microwells (6.5 mm diameter; Nunc Maxisorp High Binding) were
coated with 200 µL of diluted donkey anti-sheep IgG Fc-specific
antiserum (200 ng/well) in buffer A overnight at 4 °C. After the
wells were washed, they were blocked using buffer C (350 µL). The
microplates were then washed with buffer B (350 µL), dried, and
stored at 4 °C before use. Before the assay, the microwells were
coated with the appropriate proANP antibody (200 µL; 0.5 ng/well in
buffer D) by incubation for 5 h at room temperature.
subjects and plasma sample preparation
Blood samples were drawn from an antecubital vein after the
subjects had been supine for at least 15 min. Vacutainer Tubes
containing heparin were used. The blood was placed on ice and
centrifuged (8001000g) for 1520 min; the plasma samples
were stored at -80 °C.
Blood samples were obtained from internationally competitive male
rowers (14 males) and from age-matched sedentary control subjects (22
males). Table 1
shows the mean (± SE) ages, weights, height, blood pressure,
and heart rates of the athletes and control subjects.
|
All subjects fasted overnight, and the blood samples were collected in the morning (09001100). A repeat blood collection was obtained from seven randomly chosen athletes on a second day under the same conditions.
The Ethics Committee of Copenhagen approved the experimental procedures.
eia assays
Calibrators for proANP(1-30) (range, 0600 pmol/L) and
proANP(31-67) (range, 01250 pmol/L) were prepared in assay buffer.
The coated wells were incubated with the sheep antibody directed
against proANP for 5 h at room temperature as described. These
antibody solutions were then discarded, the wells were washed, and the
proANP calibrators, diluted samples (1:20 in assay buffer), or controls
(200 µL) were added to each well. Tracer solution [50 µL of 360
ng/L biotinylated proANP(1-30) and 3.6 µg/L biotinylated
proANP(31-67)] was pipetted into the mixture and incubated overnight
at room temperature. On the following day, the contents of the wells
were discarded. After the wells were washed three times (350 µL each
time), the peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (200 µL) was added and
incubated for 1 h with shaking at 37 °C. After the wells were
washed four times (350 µL each time), 200 µL of
3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine solution was added. The reaction was
stopped after 2030 min by the addition of 50 µL of the sulfuric
acid solution. The absorbance was read at 450 nm. Calibration curves
were prepared using a logit/log curve (absorbance vs concentration).
statistical analysis
The equation for the interpolation of the doseresponse curve was
computed with a four-parameter logistic function. Concentrations were
calculated with commercial software. Detection limits were measured as
the mean values at the 95% confidence limit of the absorbance of the
St0 samples. ANOVA was used for the statistical
analysis. P
0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Precision.
The CVs for the proANP(31-67) assay, assessed in 10
intraassay replicates of two peptide concentrations (545 and 1843
pmol/L) and in 6 different assays at 1885 pmol/L proANP(1-30), were
6%, 4%, and 9%, respectively. For 12 replicates of two proANP(31-67)
concentrations (900 and 3400 pmol/L) and for six different assays at a
peptide concentration of 3350 pmol/L, the CVs were 6%, 5%, and 9%,
respectively.
Detection limit.
The detection limits of the proANP(1-30) and
proANP(31-67) assays were 4.7 ± 0.8 pmol/L (n = 8) and
14.2 ± 2.1 pmol/L (n = 8), respectively.
Dilution and recovery tests.
Dilution curves of plasma samples
gave linearity in the EIA measurements of proANP(1-30) and
proANP(31-67). The equations for the two curves were: y
= 0.9945x - 0.7291 and y =
1.0001x - 3.428 (Fig. 3
). The recoveries of added proANP(1-30) and proANP(31-67) at
different concentrations were 102112% for 30 and 150 pmol/L
proANP(1-30) and 106102% for 25 and 750 pmol/L
proANP(31-67).
|
Interference and cross-reactivity.
Cross-reactivities between
the two peptides and with proANP(79-98) and
-ANP(99-126) were <1%.
The two EIAs, Nt-ANP and md-ANP, recognized proANP(1-98) with 68% and
108% cross-reactivity, respectively.
concentrations in plasma samples
In the control subjects (n = 22), the ir-proANP(1-30) plasma
concentration was 318 ± 38 pmol/L, whereas in athletes (n =
14), the concentration was 312 ± 25 pmol/L; there was no
significant difference between these two groups. For ir-proANP(31-67),
the plasma concentration was lower (P <0.005) in the
control group (387 ± 71 pmol/L) than in the athletes (713 ±
81 pmol/L).
The relationships between the concentrations of the two peptides in
plasma obtained from control volunteers and athletes were assessed by
the calculation of a correlation coefficient by linear regression (Fig. 4
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-ANP(99-126) hormone. As expected,
proANP(1-98) demonstrated a cross-reactivity with the antiserum
anti-proANP(31-67) and with the antiserum anti-proANP(1-30). With regard to what these assays were actually measuring, it should be taken into account that the two utilized antibodies were immunoaffinity purified; the measured immunoreactivities recognized epitopes in the proANP(1-30) and proANP(31-67) peptides, but other circulating fragments, particularly proANP(1-98), were also measured. Furthermore, other peptides such as proANP(1-67) and proANP(31-98) might be carefully investigated.
The plasma proANP fragment immunoreactivity determination by specific
antibodies suggests that the ir-proANP(1-30) is present at a lower
plasma concentration than the ir-proANP(31-67). These results are in
agreement with the findings of Numata et al. (12) and
Winters et al. (3). In fact, the molar ratio of
ir-proANP(31-67) to ir-proANP(1-30) was 2.3 ± 0.2 in the athletes
and 1.2 ± 0.2 in the sedentary subjects. Thus, the ratio for the
athletes was higher (P <0.001) than that of the sedentary
subjects. In any case, the good positive correlation (Fig. 4
) between
plasma concentrations of ir-proANP(1-30) and ir-proANP(31-67) and their
ratio may suggest cosecretion but different half-lives of the fragments
in the circulation, and renal clearance and protease activity might be
involved (3). ProANP(31-67) has been shown to have a
role in fluid and electrolyte homeostasis (13).
Synthetic proANP(31-67) and
-ANP(99-126) are diuretic and
natriuretic (14)(15). Thus, in agreement with
the hypothesis of Winters et al. (3), it could be
suggested that the same ANF prohormone, similarly to
pro-opiomelanocortin, contains several hormones within its amino acid
sequence.
Our findings demonstrate that the ir-proANP(31-67) plasma concentration
is higher in trained athletes than in sedentary control
subjects. This proANP fragment might change more slowly than
-ANP
(16)(17). The ir-proANP(31-67) might be
maintained at a high concentration as a consequence of the continuous
daily stimuli of endurance training, but blood pressure might also be
involved. In fact, a strong positive correlation with systolic and
diastolic blood pressure has been observed in exercising healthy
individuals (18). Stimulation of atrial ANP(1-126) synthesis
and the release of
-ANP(99-126) and proANP-related fragments could
be caused by atrial stretch and distension associated with physical
activity. Proveda et al. (19) recently demonstrated that
diastolic blood pressure at rest was lower in a group of trained
athletes than in control subjects. This finding is in agreement with
the present data (P <0.005; Table 1
), which were generated
not to study this application, but to suggest one of the uses of these
analytical methods.
Among elderly women, differences in the response of the NH2 terminus of proANP were found that are suggested to reflect differences in postsecretory mechanisms (20). Other factors may include renal function and other hormones, as well as other biochemical variables of hemodynamic involvement.
In conclusion, this study reinforces the idea that proANP fragments with a longer half-life, such as proANP(1-30) and proANP(31-67), can be useful biochemical indices in a study of physical exercise. The measurements carried out on plasma samples obtained from healthy sedentary subjects and from athletes demonstrated no statistical difference for the ir-proANP(1-30), but plasma ir-proANP(31-67) was higher in the trained athletes than in the sedentary subjects. This finding suggests a use of these assays for evaluation of fluid homeostasis with physical exercise.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
M. Ala-Kopsala, J. Magga, K. Peuhkurinen, J. Leipala, H. Ruskoaho, J. Leppaluoto, and O. Vuolteenaho Molecular Heterogeneity Has a Major Impact on the Measurement of Circulating N-Terminal Fragments of A- and B-Type Natriuretic Peptides Clin. Chem., September 1, 2004; 50(9): 1576 - 1588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Vesely Natriuretic peptides and acute renal failure Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2003; 285(2): F167 - F177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |