Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 46: 1057-1064, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wedemeyer, N.
Right arrow Articles by Pötter, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wedemeyer, N.
Right arrow Articles by Pötter, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:1057-1064.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Articles

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Reverse Transcription-PCR Products: Quantification of p21WAF1/CIP1 and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen mRNA

Niels Wedemeyera,1, Wolfgang Göhde1 and Thomas Pötter1

1 Department of Radiobiology, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Robert-Koch-Strasse 43, 48149 Münster, Germany.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 49-251-8355303; e-mail wedemey{at}uni-muenster.de


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) is a powerful tool in clinical diagnostics for analyzing even small amounts of RNA, but sensitive assays for quantifying the amplification products are time-consuming or expensive. Here we describe a novel flow cytometry-based assay for rapid and sensitive determination of relative amounts of RT-PCR products.

Methods: For flow cytometric quantification, PCR products were labeled with both digoxigenin and biotin during amplification. Subsequently, amplicons were simultaneously bound to anti-digoxigenin microparticles and fluorescently labeled with streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin. Fluorescence intensity per bead was determined by flow cytometry. To study this assay, we examined the expression of the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) gene in ultraviolet irradiation-exposed human keratinocytes lacking functional p53.

Results: Fluorescence was linear with 60–10 000 pg of PCR product. As little as 0.4 fmol (40 pg of a 163-bp amplicon) of PCR product could be distinguished from background. The between-run CV of the fluorescent signal for 10 ng of p21 cDNA was 12% (n = 10). The fluorescence-template curve was sigmoidal. p21WAF1/CIP1 mRNA was decreased after ultraviolet irradiation of keratinocytes, whereas PCNA mRNA was markedly increased.

Conclusion: The flow cytometric assay permits rapid (25 min) and reproducible identification of changes in mRNA abundance.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Steady-state transcript expression provides a global readout of the physiological status of a cell or tissue. Alteration of gene expression often correlates with developmental changes or cellular response to external influences, e.g., hormones, viral infections, toxic compounds, or irradiation. Therefore, the study of changes in mRNA abundance allows important insights into gene and protein function as well as molecular processes in diseased cells. RNA abundance can be determined by a variety of methods, e.g., RNA blotting, RNA in situ hybridization, the RNase protection assay, and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)1 (1). The choice of method largely depends on the mRNA abundance and the amount of available cells or tissue. RT-PCR offers a higher specificity and sensitivity than traditional approaches and is therefore the method of choice if the sample size is limited (e.g., in biopsies) or the gene of interest is expressed in small amounts. For accuracy, however, this technique requires the use of internal standards (2). Moreover, quantification at higher cycle numbers, which usually is performed for end-point approaches, is less precise than detection at lower cycle numbers (during the exponential phase) (3). This, however, requires very sensitive detection as described for some commercially available systems such as the LightCycler or ABI PRISM 7700 (4)(5).

Flow cytometry is a sensitive technique for quantifying fluorescence-labeled particles or cells. Fluorescence can be introduced by target-specific ligands, e.g., antibodies conjugated with a fluorophore. These samples are carried in a flow stream through a laser beam, which excites the fluorescent dyes associated with the cells or particles. Finally, emitted fluorescent light is multiplied and detected by a photomultiplier. Flow cytometry is capable of measuring thousands of particles per second and has an average detection limit of several hundred fluorescent molecules per particle. This technique is widely used to study cellular physiology, especially to analyze cell cycle progression or cells representing particular antigens. In recent years, bead-based flow cytometric methods have been developed to detect PCR products of viral DNA or RNA with high sensitivity (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). However, for routine clinical diagnostics these techniques are too labor- and time-intensive (at least 2 h). Usually, internally digoxigenin-labeled PCR products are hybridized after amplification to biotinylated probes to introduce a second label. Hybrid DNA is then captured using streptavidin-coated beads. Fluorescence is introduced separately by staining the bead-coupled products with anti-digoxigenin antibodies conjugated to a fluorescent dye. Finally, the beads are analyzed by flow cytometry.

In this report we describe a novel flow cytometric assay for more rapid and direct quantification of RT-PCR products in ~25 min without the need for additional hybridization steps and antibody reactions. In contrast to the above techniques, we offer a simple two-step method: both labels are introduced during PCR, using primers labeled with digoxigenin and biotin, respectively. These two labels enable simultaneous binding of PCR products to microparticles coated with anti-digoxigenin antibodies and staining with streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin utilizing the biotin label. Because unincorporated oligonucleotides can decrease fluorescence intensity (6), we also developed a rapid and easy technique to remove these primers before binding/staining.

Using this flow cytometric assay, we studied the expression of the p21WAF1/CIP1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) genes in a human nontumorigenic keratinocyte cell line (HaCaT) exposed to a suberythemal dose of ultraviolet irradiation (UV-B). Both genes are part of the cellular response to irradiation and are involved in cell cycle arrest and nucleotide excision repair, respectively (11)(12).


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture and UV irradiation
Spontaneously immortalized human keratinocytes [HaCaT cell line (13)] were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 to a density of 2.5 x 106 cells in 57 cm2 NunclonTM dishes for cell culture (85-mm diameter; Nunc) using supplemented Nutrient Mixture F-10 Ham according to the instructions of the supplier (Sigma).

After the medium was decanted, cells were exposed at 37 °C and 5% CO2 to a 0.16 minimal erythema dose (MED) of UV-B. A TL 4W/12 lamp was used, delivering 0.8 J/m2 s at the position of the sample (Philips; main emission, 280–370 nm; 1 MED = 200 J/m2 erythema effective radiation for Caucasian skin type; for emission spectrum of the given source, 230 J/m2 corresponds to ~0.16 MED). Control cells were treated in the same manner but not exposed. After irradiation, medium kept at 37 °C was added.

RNA isolation and reverse transcription
Total RNA was isolated from 2 x 106 HaCaT cells using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). After photometric quantification, 2 µg of total RNA was used for a 20-µL reverse transcription reaction containing 50 pmol of oligo-dT18 primer, 200 U of OMNISCRIPT reverse transcriptase (Qiagen), 40 units of rRNasin RNase inhibitor (Promega), dNTPs (final concentration, 500 µmol/L), and buffer as recommended by the supplier. Samples were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and finally heated at 95 °C for 3 min. For PCR, 1 µL of the reverse transcription sample was used.

PCR
PCRs (volume, 25 µL) were set up using 1 ng of plasmid DNA (human p21 full-length cDNA clone; clone ID 309881) or 1 µL of reverse transcription sample, respectively; 25 pmol of each primer (listed in Table 1 ); 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Qiagen); 100 µmol of each nucleotide; and buffers as recommended by the supplier. Cycling conditions were as follows: 1 cycle at 94 °C for 4 min, and up to 35 cycles at 60 °C for 40 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and 92 °C for 40 s, with final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Amplifications were performed in the Autogene II thermocycler (Grant Instruments).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

Primer removal
To remove unincorporated primers, 1 µL of silica magnetic particles (Merck) and 30 µL of 8 mol/L NaClO4 were added to 10 µL of PCR product. After incubation at 50 °C for 5 min, the mixture was placed in a magnetic concentrator and the supernatant was discarded. The PCR products were eluted by resuspension in 10 µL of H2O and incubation at 50 °C for 5 min, whereas primers remained attached to the particles. After immobilization of the particles in a magnet holder, the supernatant was transferred into a fresh tube.

Capturing and staining of PCR products
Before capturing the PCR products to anti-digoxigenin magnetic particles (Roche Diagnostics), we washed the particles twice in 500 µL of 3x binding buffer (15 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 1.5 mmol/L EDTA, 150 mmol/L NaCl), using a magnetic holder. After washing, 1 µL of beads was incubated with 1 µL of a purified PCR reaction and 1 µL of 90 g/L streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin (Sigma) by rotating at room temperature for 10 min. Finally, the beads were washed with 500 µL of phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.02 mL/L Tween 20, and resuspended in 1.5 mL of Tris-EDTA.

Flow cytometric analysis
The labeled beads were analyzed on a PAS III flow cytometer (Partec) with FloMax instrument software. The excitation light was provided by a 25 mW argon laser operated at 488 nm. The orange emission was measured with a 575–605 nm bandpass filter. The sensitivity of the flow cytometer was adjusted using control beads (FluoroSphere; Dako). The data were displayed as fluorescence histograms, and the mean value was used to quantify the fluorescence signals.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Sensitivity of the flow cytometric assay
In contrast to previously described bead assays, we aimed to develop a more rapid method for the detection of PCR products by flow cytometry. The most time-consuming steps in previous bead assays were the hybridizations, antibody reactions, and washing procedures. To reduce the number of steps, we introduced both labels during RT-PCR using 5'-digoxigenin- and 5'-biotin-labeled primers (Fig. 1 ); we then used anti-digoxigenin beads and streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin to assure capture and fluorescence labeling of PCR products within one single 10-min step. The beads were analyzed by flow cytometry after a final washing step to remove nonspecifically bound phycoerythrin. This assay allowed PCR product quantification in ~25 min.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Schematic of the flow cytometric quantification of RT-PCR products.

RT, reverse transcription; B, biotin; D, digoxigenin.

To test the feasibility and sensitivity of this assay, a purified 163-bp p21 PCR product was used. The concentration of the purified amplification product was determined by measurement of the absorbance at 260 nm. Two independent dilution series of the PCR product ranging from 10 ng (0.1 pmol) to 10 pg (0.1 fmol) were generated. Simultaneous capturing to the magnetic particles and staining with streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin was performed twice for each dilution. As negative control for every assay, beads were stained in parallel in the absence of PCR products, and their mean fluorescence intensity was defined as background. With regard to their relative fluorescence signals, a representative population of 10 000 beads was analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 2 ). For all dilution series, 40 pg (0.4 fmol) of PCR products produced a mean fluorescence higher than the fluorescence of the beads alone, whereas the mean fluorescence of 20 pg (0.2 fmol) of PCR product could not be clearly discriminated from the mean fluorescence of the beads. The calculated detection limit was 38 pg (the mean fluorescence of blank beads plus 2 SD was 1.36 arbitrary units and the mean fluorescence of 40 pg of PCR product was 1.45 ± 0.11). The good reproducibility of the assay is reflected in small standard deviations of the mean fluorescence values (Fig. 2B ). In 10 independent PCR reactions of the same template (10 ng of p21 cDNA), the CV was 12%.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Fluorescence histograms of microparticle-bound PCR products (A), and determination of lower limit of detection (B).

(A), fluorescence of various amounts of stained p21 PCR product bound to microparticles. The mean fluorescence intensity of the histogram was used for quantification. (B), 10 ng (0.1 pmol) to 10 pg (0.1 fmol) of a purified 163-bp p21 PCR product was analyzed in duplicate by the bead assay, using two independent dilution series. Two samples of each dilution were measured flow cytometrically, and SDs (bars) were calculated from the four values.

To determine the PCR kinetics, different amounts of template DNA were used. After each PCR cycle, products were examined by flow cytometry. Fig. 3 shows that amplification of 1 ng of p21 cDNA plasmid template (2.4 x 108 molecules) was detectable after 12 cycles and reached the stationary phase after 21 cycles, whereas the PCR product of 1 pg of template DNA (2.4 x 105 molecules) was observed after 20 cycles. To compare the sensitivity of the flow cytometric assay with conventional methods, amplicons of a 163-bp p21 sequence were generated using various amounts of p21 cDNA template each in two independent PCR reactions (25 cycles). After purification, 10 µL of each PCR product was separated by gel electrophoresis. The photograph of the ethidium bromide-stained gel served for densitometric quantification. In parallel, 1 µL of each PCR product was used for the flow cytometric assay. The densitometric quantification of ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels permitted the detection of PCR product from 1 pg (2.4 x 105 molecules) of p21 template cDNA, whereas 10-fold less product from 0.1 pg (2.4 x 104 molecules) template was still detectable by flow cytometry (Fig. 4 ).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Amplification plots of a serially diluted human p21 cDNA plasmid.

After each PCR cycle, amplicon was isolated, purified, and analyzed by flow cytometry.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Comparative quantification of PCR products by flow cytometry and by an ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel.

PCR was performed for 25 cycles using various amounts of p21 cDNA template. From each reaction, 10 µL of PCR product was separated by gel electrophoresis. After staining with ethidium bromide, a photograph was taken for densitometric purposes. In parallel, 1 µL of each PCR product was analyzed by the flow cytometric assay. The highest value of each method was defined as 100%. The amplification plots obtained from densitometric quantification ({blacktriangleup}) and from flow cytometric quantification (•) are shown; bars, SD.

Because of the competitive binding properties of digoxigenin-labeled primers and PCR products to the anti-digoxigenin magnetic particles, a rapid method for removal of unincorporated primers by silica magnetic particles was developed. Small single-stranded DNA fragments exhibit a high affinity to these particles, whereas DNA fragments larger than 40 bp can be completely eluted by H2O (Fig. 5 A). The usefulness of this purification was demonstrated by flow cytometric quantification of purified and nonpurified p21 PCR products after various cycles. Nonpurified samples revealed substantially lower fluorescence intensities (Fig. 5B ).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Removal of unincorporated primers using silica magnetic particles (A), and effect of unincorporated primers on fluorescence intensity (B).

(A), PCR products obtained from a human p21 cDNA clone were run on a 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. Lane 1, {phi}X 174/Hae III; lane 2, PCR without template DNA; lane 3, nonpurified PCR products; lane 4, PCR products purified using silica magnetic particles. (B), purified and unpurified p21 PCR products isolated at various cycles were analyzed by the flow cytometry.

Expression of p21 and PCNA in UV-B-exposed keratinocytes
It previously has been reported that p21 and PCNA are both up-regulated in primary fibroblasts after UV irradiation (14). However, UV-exposed cancer cell lines showed a significant decrease of p21 expression (15). To determine the time-dependent expression of p21 and PCNA in p53-deficient nontumorigenic human keratinocytes (HaCaT cell line) after UV-B exposure, we performed a quantitative RT-PCR together with the flow cytometric assay. After exposure of HaCaT cells to 0.16 MED of UV-B, an accumulation in the S-phase of the cell cycle occurred (16), in contrast to a G1 block observed in irradiated primary fibroblast cells (14). The total RNA from cells harvested at various times after UV irradiation was isolated to analyze the physiological alterations of the mRNA abundance. The RNA integrity was verified by gel electrophoresis. Because RNA extraction and reverse transcription are the most common sources of variability in quantitative RT-PCR (3), endogenous ß-actin mRNA was used as a calibrator.

After reverse transcription, PCR was performed using 5'-modified primers specific for ß-actin, p21, and PCNA, respectively. To identify DNA contamination, primers localized in two different exons were used, which enabled gel electrophoretic size distribution of products derived from genomic DNA and mRNA (Table 1Up ). Gel electrophoretic evaluation of amplification products of each gene was performed after 15, 20, and 25 PCR cycles, respectively, to determine the exponential amplification phase. Because the amount of amplification product accumulating during the exponential phase is proportional to the quantity of the initial target sequence (17), RT-PCR of ß-actin was carried out for 15 cycles, PCNA for 20 cycles, and p21 for 25 cycles. Two independent PCR reactions were performed per gene and incubation time after irradiation. After purification, two samples of each amplification product were analyzed independently by flow cytometry.

Although p21 expression was slightly increased 1 h after irradiation, a significant decrease of expression was observed between 3 and 7 h after treatment (Fig. 6 ). In contrast, the expression of PCNA increased linearly and the expression of ß-actin remained almost constant throughout the observation period.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 6. Time-dependent abundance of ß-actin (top), p21 (middle), and PCNA (bottom) mRNA in human keratinocytes after UV-B irradiation.

Keratinocytes (HaCaT cells) were cultured for 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after UV-B exposure. Subsequently, total RNA was isolated and used for reverse transcription. To obtain products from the exponential phase of PCR, 15 cycles (ß-actin), 20 cycles (PCNA), and 25 cycles (p21), respectively, were performed. Finally, the amount of PCR product was determined using the flow cytometric assay.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Quantitative RT-PCR has become a common diagnostic tool for gene expression monitoring (3). However, many conventional methods of quantitative RT-PCR are too labor-intensive and are therefore not applicable for routine diagnostic studies. We have developed a flow cytometry-based method for the rapid and sensitive quantification of RT-PCR products. We have not compared this method with quantitative RT-PCR by kinetic analysis using ABI PRISM 7700 system or LightCycler. However, manual densitometric analysis of the PCR products separated by gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide appears to be less sensitive than the flow cytometric assay as illustrated in Fig. 4Up . It has to be mentioned that densitometric analysis using radiolabeled probe hybridization, which needs much more working effort, would give similar sensitivity compared to the flow cytometric assay.

Internal standards have been proposed to overcome the high tube-to-tube variability of the RT-PCR (2). This, however, requires multiple reverse transcription and amplification of each sample at several concentrations of a competitor RNA, which greatly increases costs and labor input and is therefore impractical for clinical studies on a large scale. Although competitive quantitative RT-PCR is the method of choice for quantification of mRNA, the measurement of relative changes of gene expression frequently is sufficient. The flow cytometric assay is also capable of competitive quantification, and several PCR products can be assessed in a single reaction, e.g., amplicons of target RNA and a heterologous RNA calibrator of known concentration. For this purpose, each amplification product has to carry a different modification for the simultaneous binding to certain bead populations differing in size and binding specificity. In the flow cytometer, these bead populations can be readily distinguished by size to enable separate quantification of each PCR product. The easy-to-use procedure of the presented flow cytometric assay in combination with magnetic particle separation facilitates automation for high-throughput analyses of mRNA abundance.

Flow cytometry is an important, widely used diagnostic tool for sensitive quantification of cells, antigens, DNA, and molecular interactions (18)(19). PCR product quantification by flow cytometry previously has been shown for viral sequences (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Although these multiple-step procedures permit high sensitivity, they are too time-consuming. In comparison, the flow cytometric assay described here does not require hybridization steps and antibody reactions but does offer high sensitivity. Although the multiple incorporation of labeled nucleotides yielded a high fluorescence intensity in former assays, quantification was more difficult. Therefore, we used a biotinylated primer to bind exactly one phycoerythrin molecule per amplicon. This provides a strong proportionality of bound amplicons and fluorescence intensity. One single fluorescent dye per PCR product is sufficient for high sensitivity over a broad range of template DNA concentrations ( Figs. 2–4Up Up Up ).

In contrast to previously described methods, we used anti-digoxigenin magnetic particles, which provide binding capacities and kinetics similar to those of streptavidin-coated particles. However, the capture of PCR products using anti-digoxigenin magnetic particles allows simultaneous fluorescence labeling using streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin, which provides more rapid binding kinetics than antibodies.

The presence of unincorporated digoxigenin-labeled primers markedly decreases fluorescence intensity and thus lowers sensitivity (Fig. 5BUp ). Therefore, we developed a rapid and inexpensive procedure that uses silica magnetic particles to remove unreacted primers before amplicon binding to the beads.

The flow cytometric assay was applied for the analysis of p21 and PCNA expression in UV-B-irradiated immortalized keratinocytes lacking functional p53 (13)(20). A reduction of p21 mRNA in response to UV irradiation was observed. Wang et al. (15) also showed a down-regulation of p21 in various human cancer cell lines, regardless of the functional status of p53. They suggested that the failure of UV to induce p21 is linked to immortalization and transformation because primary mouse and human cells, including keratinocytes, revealed an up-regulation of p21 after UV exposure (14)(21).

HaCaT cells were recently demonstrated to be highly susceptible to UV-induced apoptosis, unlike normal keratinocytes (22). Moreover, p16 is absent in HaCaT cells because of hypermethylation of its promoter (22). Because cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, such as p21 and p16, play a key role in protecting cells from apoptosis, we suggest a link between immortalization, the altered regulation of apoptosis, and the down-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in HaCaT cells.

In contrast to p21, the PCNA mRNA was increased after UV exposure of HaCaT cells. PCNA is required for both DNA replication and nucleotide excision repair. Moreover, it was suggested that the p53/p21 signal transduction pathway is important for the regulation of PCNA expression following irradiation (23). However, in agreement with Chang et al. (24), our results demonstrate that UV induction of PCNA is independent of p53 and p21.

With increasing knowledge of gene sequences, the determination of disease-related expression patterns of mRNA has become clinically relevant. Cancer, for example, arises from multiple changes in the cellular phenotype that are not restricted to mutated genes. A mutation in a gene may affect the expression of a series of genes that are below it in the regulatory cascade (25). To confirm expression changes detected with the new high-throughput technologies, such as hybridization of microarrays (26), rapid, sensitive, and reliable assays for quantification of mRNA abundance have to be developed. The flow cytometric method described here fulfils these criteria.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Steffi Wetzlich for excellent technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; UV-B, ultraviolet irradiation; and MED, minimal erythema dose.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Raval P. Qualitative and quantitative determination of mRNA. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1994;32:125-127. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Gilliland G, Perrin S, Blanchard K, Bunn HF. Analysis of cytokine mRNA and DNA: detection and quantitation by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:2725-2729. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Freeman WM, Walker SJ, Vrana KE. Quantitative RT-PCR. Pitfalls and potential. Biotechniques 1999;26:112-125. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Thorpe PH, Porteous DJ. Rapid quantitation of gene therapy specific CFTR expression using the amplification refractory mutation system. Biotechniques 1999;27:122-126. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Gibson UEM, Heid CA, Williams PM. A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Res 1996;6:995-1001. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Vlieger AM, Medenblik AMJC, van Gjilswijk RPM, Tanke HJ, van der Ploeg M, Gratama JW, Raap AK. Quantitation of polymerase chain reaction products by hybridization-based assays with fluorescent, colorimetric, or chemiluminescent detection. Anal Biochem 1992;205:1-7. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Yang G, Ulrich PP, Aiyer RA, Rawal BD, Vyas GN. Detection of hepatitis B virus in plasma using flow cytometric analyses of polymerase chain reaction-amplified DNA incorporating digoxigenin-11-dUTP. Blood 1993;81:1083-1088. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yang G, Olson JC, Pu R, Vyas GN. Flow cytometric detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviral DNA by the polymerase chain reaction incorporating digoxigenin- or fluorescein-labeled dUTP. Cytometry 1995;21:197-202. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Mehrpouyan M, Bishop JE, Ostrerova N, van Cleve M, Lohman KL. A rapid and sensitive method for the non-isotopic quantitation of HIV-1 RNA using thermophilic SDA and flow cytometry. Mol Cell Probes 1997;11:337-347. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Dorenbaum A, Venkateswaran KS, Yang G, Comeau AM, Wara D, Vyas GN. Transmission of HIV-1 in infants born to seropositive mothers: PCR-amplified proviral DNA detected by flow cytometric analysis of immunoreactive beads. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1997;15:35-42. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ. The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell 1993;75:805-816. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Li R, Waga S, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B. Differential effects by the p21 CDK inhibitor on PCNA-dependent DNA replication and repair. Nature 1994;371:534-537. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Boukamp P, Petrussevska RT, Breitkreutz D, Hornung J, Markham A, Fusenig NE. Normal keratinization in a spontaneously immortalized aneuploid human keratinocyte cell line. J Cell Biol 1988;106:761-771. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Li R, Hannon GJ, Beach D, Stillman B. Subcellular distribution of p21 and PCNA in normal and repair-deficient cells following DNA damage. Curr Biol 1996;6:189-199. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Wang JA, Fan S, Yuan RQ, Ma YX, Meng Q, Goldberg ID, Rosen EM. Ultraviolet radiation down-regulates expression of the cell-cycle inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 in human cancer cells independently of p53. Int J Radiat Biol 1999;75:301-316. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Pötter T, Göhde W, Wedemeyer N, Köhnlein W. UV exposed keratinocytes reveal three differentially expressed genes with potential function in differentiation and cell cycle control. Radiat Res 2000;in press..
  17. Ferre F. Quantitative or semiquantitative PCR: reality versus myth. PCR Methods Appl 1992;2:1-9. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Villas BH. Flow cytometry: an overview. Cell Vis 1998;5:56-61. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nolan JP, Sklar LA. The emergence of flow cytometry for sensitive, real-time measurements of molecular interactions. Nat Biotechnol 1998;16:633-638. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Black HS, deGruijl FR, Forbes PD, Cleaver JE, Ananthaswamy HN, deFabo EC, et al. Photocarcinogenesis: an overview. J Photochem Photobiol B 1997;40:29-47. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Wu L, Levine AJ. Differential regulation of the p21/WAF-1 and mdm2 genes after high-dose UV irradiation: p53-dependent and p53-independent regulation of the mdm2 gene. Mol Med 1997;3:441-451. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Chaturvedi V, Qin JZ, Denning MF, Choubey D, Diaz MO, Nickoloff BJ. Apoptosis in proliferating, senescent, and immortalized keratinocytes. J Biol Chem 1999;274:23358-23367. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wenz F, Azzam EI, Little JB. The response of proliferating cell nuclear antigen to ionizing radiation in human lymphoblastoid cell lines is dependent on p53. Radiat Res 1998;149:32-40. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Chang HW, Lai YC, Cheng CY, Ho JL, Ding ST, Liu YC. UV inducibility of rat proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene promotor. J Cell Biochem 1999;73:423-432. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Zhang M, Martin KJ, Sheng S, Sager R. Expression genetics: a different approach to cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Trends Biotechnol 1998;16:66-70. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Heller RA, Schena M, Chai A, Schalon D, Bedilion T, Gilmore J, et al. Discovery and analysis of inflammatory disease-related genes using cDNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:2150-2155. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
T. Hata, H. Yamamoto, C. Y. Ngan, M. Koi, A. Takagi, B. Damdinsuren, M. Yasui, Y. Fujie, T. Matsuzaki, H. Hemmi, et al.
Role of p21waf1/cip1 in effects of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2005; 4(10): 1585 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
N. Wedemeyer, T. Potter, S. Wetzlich, and W. Gohde
Flow Cytometric Quantification of Competitive Reverse Transcription-PCR Products
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2002; 48(9): 1398 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wedemeyer, N.
Right arrow Articles by Pötter, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wedemeyer, N.
Right arrow Articles by Pötter, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS