Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 48: 1796-1797, 2002;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carayannopoulos, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gronowski, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carayannopoulos, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gronowski, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2002;48:1796-1797.)
© 2002 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Total ß-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Measured in Urine by an Automated Method

Mary O. Carayannopoulos, David G. Grenache and Ann M. Gronowskia

1 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Box 8118, St. Louis, MO 63110

aauthor for correspondence: fax 314-362-1461, e-mail gronowski{at}pathology.wustl.edu

Methods to quantify human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in serum are well established (1), but automated quantitative urine assays are not readily available. When the validity of point-of-care qualitative urine hCG results are called into question, a rapid quantitative method for urine hCG could be useful. In the present study, we have validated the Abbott AxSYM Total ß-hCG (Abbott Laboratories) assay (approved for serum use only) for use in the quantitative determination of urinary concentrations of total ß-hCG.

Recovery studies were performed by adding hCG (US Pharmacopeia) to urine from premenopausal, nonpregnant females. Recovery studies were carried out in quadruplicate in two separate experiments. Recovery was 99–112% at concentrations of 26–725 IU/L (Table 1 ). Urine protein at concentrations up to 7.4 g/L had no effect on recovery (not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Recovery of total ß-hCG from urine by the Abbott AxSYM.

Intra- and interassay imprecision was evaluated by adding hCG at three different concentrations into urine from a premenopausal, nonpregnant female. Intraassay imprecision (CV) was 4.0% at 31 IU/L, 3.9% at 181 IU/L, and 2% at 652 IU/L (n = 10 at each concentration). Interassay (total) imprecision (CV) for twice-daily assays over 7–10 days (of a separate set of urine samples with added hCG) was 6.8% at 30 IU/L, 4.5% at 175 IU/L, and 10% at 454 IU/L. This precision is similar to that seen in our laboratory for serum (not shown).

The minimum detection limit was evaluated by measuring total ß-hCG in urine from 10 premenopausal, nonpregnant females and 36 males. The mean hCG was 4.35 IU/L (range, 0–9.1 IU/L; SD, 1.8 IU/L). The minimum detection limit, calculated as the mean + 3 SD, was thus 9.7 IU/L.

We measured total ß-hCG in duplicate in two experiments in samples with 0–40 IU of hCG added per liter. Results were linear from 10 to 40 IU/L, but deviated >10% from the expected at concentrations at concentrations <10 IU/L (Fig. 1A ). Therefore, we considered the lower limit of the reportable range to be 10 IU/L. For serum, our laboratory determined this limit to be 2 IU/L.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Linearity of Abbott AxSYM assay for urine hCG determination.

hCG was added to urine from a premenopausal, nonpregnant woman and was measured in duplicate. Lines represent the line of identity. (A), 0–40 IU/L hCG; (B), 0–1000 IU/L hCG.

Linearity was evaluated by adding hCG to urine from a premenopausal, nonpregnant female at concentrations from 0 to 1070 IU/L. Total ß-hCG was measured in duplicate. The assay was linear to 535 IU/L, deviating >10% from the expected at concentrations >535 IU/L (Fig. 1BUp ). For serum, our laboratory found the assay to be linear to 800 IU/L.

There are several caveats regarding the measurement of hCG in urine. The first caveat is that urine contains regular, intact hCG; nicked hCG; hyperglycosylated hCG; free ß-hCG; and a significant amount of ß-core fragment (1). Many assays designed to measure serum hCG, including the Abbott AxSYM, are unable to detect the ß-core fragment (1). Therefore, it is possible that some urine samples may have intact hCG concentrations too low to be detected by the Abbott AxSYM method, when at the same time, the ß-core fragment concentrations are increased. However, this inability to detect the ß-core fragment is also a problem with the point-of-care hCG devices: they detect only intact hCG. The second caveat is that urinary hCG concentrations can vary significantly depending on fluid intake. Therefore, a serum hCG-positive individual may test negative on a urine hCG test because of very dilute urine. This is one of the limitations of testing urine to confirm pregnancy, especially on random samples. A positive is useful, but a negative must be interpreted with caution. For the purposes of confirming point-of-care hCG devices, the Abbott AxSYM should be sufficient because both methods are subject to the same set of limitations.

The Abbott AxSYM Total ß-hCG assay can be used to quantify urine ß-hCG as low as 10 IU/L. The point-of-care urine hCG devices used in laboratories detect hCG concentrations >=20 IU/L (2). Therefore, the quantitative method described appears to provide an adequate detection limit for confirming results from point-of-care devices. Furthermore, it showed excellent precision and is fully automated, making it an easy method to use in the laboratory.

Parts of this work were presented at the AACC Annual Meeting, July 28–August 1, 2002.


References

  1. Cole LA. Immunoassay of human chorionic gonadotropin, its free subunits, and metabolites. Clin Chem 1997;43:2233-2243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. . College of Pathologists. CM-C clinical microscopy survey 2001 2001 College of American Pathologists Northfield, IL. .



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. M. Halldorsdottir, M. O. Carayannopoulos, M. Scrivner, and A. M. Gronowski
Method Evaluation for Total {beta}-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Using Urine and the ADVIA Centaur
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2003; 49(8): 1421 - 1422.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carayannopoulos, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gronowski, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carayannopoulos, M. O.
Right arrow Articles by Gronowski, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS