Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 50: 2398-2401, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.040303
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hortin, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hortin, G. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:2398-2401.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Potential Interferences from Blood Collection Tubes in Mass Spectrometric Analyses of Serum Polypeptides

Steven K. Drake1, Raffick A.R. Bowen2, Alan T. Remaley2 and Glen L. Hortin2,a

Departments of1 Critical Care Medicine and2 Laboratory Medicine, Warren Magnuson Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Medicine, NIH, Bldg. 10, Room 2C-407, Bethesda, MD 20892-1508; fax 301-402-1885, e-mail ghortin{at}mail.cc.nih.gov

Currently, there are high degrees of both enthusiasm and controversy regarding the potential diagnostic application of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI TOF) mass spectrometry (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). This technique permits the simultaneous analysis of a large number of polypeptide components in biological fluids. Greatest sensitivity and resolution are achieved by MALDI TOF mass spectrometry in the mass range from ~500 to 20 000 Da; this has led to the recognition that there is a highly complex mixture of peptide components in serum that circulate bound to larger proteins (8)(9). The complex patterns of peptide components are very information rich and may contain multiple biomarkers of diagnostic value (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9).

The present study examined whether different types of blood collection tubes add molecules to specimens that may appear as interfering or confounding peaks during MALDI TOF mass spectrometry. Commercially available blood collection tubes contain multiple components that may shed polymers in the molecular size range of interest. Silicones are commonly used as lubricants for stoppers or coatings for the internal surface of tubes. Polymeric surfactants such as polyvinylpyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols may be added to influence surface wetting. Tubes may contain either clot inhibitors or activators. Serum separator tubes contain polymeric gels with several constituents to adjust viscosity, density, and other physical properties. Rubber stoppers and the plastics comprising tube walls may shed polymeric components or plasticizers. Previous studies have reported effects of blood collection tubes on a variety of laboratory tests (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). These effects can arise from adsorption of serum or plasma components to the tube or separator gel, from the release of materials that interfere with specific test procedures, or from variable clotting of specimens. Although the potential effects of blood collection tubes need to be considered for any laboratory test, this may be particularly important for MALDI TOF mass spectrometry-based laboratory tests, which measure a broad spectrum of different components in a single analysis.

We examined the shedding of components from tubes into aqueous solutions by adding 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2; KD Medical) to collection tubes and incubating the tubes at room temperature for ~4 h with gentle rocking to allow contact with all surfaces of the tubes. This was considered to simulate typical contact times of blood specimens from collection to processing or analysis. Tubes tested included multiple types from two manufacturers, Becton Dickinson and Greiner Bio-One Vacuette North America (Table 1 ). After incubation in tubes, saline solutions were mixed with one-half volume of 6 mol/L guanidine hydrochloride containing 3 g/L trifluoroacetic acid. We extracted 30-µL aliquots by solid-phase extraction on Millipore C18 ZipTips® with a bed volume of 0.6 µL of reversed-phase packing. Tips were washed three times with 1 g/L trifluoroacetic acid before materials bound to the solid phase were eluted with 3 µL of 500 mL/L acetonitrile containing 1 g/L trifluoroacetic acid. Equal volumes (1 µL) of eluate and 50 mmol/L {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid or sinapinic acid matrix in 500 mL/L acetonitrile containing 1 g/L trifluoroacetic acid were mixed on a 384-position target plate and dried. Analyses were performed with a Bruker UltraFlex® MALDI TOF mass spectrometer in positive linear mode as described previously (15). Briefly, data were summed for 300 laser pulses collected from 10 positions. Measurements of mass/charge (m/z) were by external calibration. Calibrators, {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, and sinapinic acid were purchased from Bruker Daltonics.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Peaks observed by MALDI TOF mass spectrometry in extracts of blood collection tubes.1

Serum collection tubes, except for a no-additive glass tube, contributed components that yielded a complex series of peaks with a constant m/z interval in the m/z range from ~1000 to 3000 (Fig. 1 and Table 1Up ). Assuming that the primary components have a single positive charge, the series appeared as groups of five to six peaks differing by 14 Da and repeating every 111 Da. The 111-Da repeating unit was consistent with the monomer mass for polyvinylpyrrolidone, whereas the 14-Da unit may correspond to variation in the number of methylene groups (-CH2-) or methyl for hydrogen substitutions in the polymer. These were observed most clearly when we used the {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix, which generally yielded high signal intensities for components in the m/z range <5000. The pattern was similar but not identical for products from the two different manufacturers. Becton Dickinson plastic serum separator tubes exhibited peaks with greatest intensities at m/z 1800–1900 (Fig. 1A ), whereas Greiner Bio-One plastic serum separator tubes exhibited peaks with greatest intensities at a slightly lower m/z of ~1400 (Fig. 1B ). It was difficult to precisely define the upper limit for m/z of peaks because there was a gradual loss of intensity with increasing m/z, but peaks were apparent up to m/z of ~3000 for most of the serum tubes.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. MALDI TOF mass spectra of components extracted from different types of blood collection tubes by saline solution.

Each spectrum is the sum of data from 300 laser shots with no background subtraction or smoothing. (A), 3.5-mL Vacutainer® SST® Gel & Clot Activator Plus Plastic; (B), 4-mL Vacuette® Z serum separator with clot activator; (C), 3-mL Vacutainer Plus 5.4 mg K2EDTA; (D), 10 x 65 mm Glass Vacutainer No Additive; (E), 8.5-mL Plus Plastic K2EDTA P100 v 1.0 plasma separator tube for research protein analysis.

The mass spectra for extracts from an EDTA-containing plasma collection tube (Fig. 1CUp ) and from a no-additive glass collection tube with glycerol as a stopper lubricant (Fig. 1DUp ) did not show any peaks that were obvious by visual inspection, and a computer algorithm for analyzing spectra on the mass spectrometer (Sophisticated Numerical Annotation Procedure or SNAP) did not identify any potential peaks with a signal/noise ratio >20. There were a few potential small peaks, but these could not be confidently distinguished from noise. By comparison, when we used the signal/noise ratio >20 cutoff, we identified 13 peaks in the spectrum in Fig. 1AUp and 33 in Fig. 1BUp .

The spectrum for an extract from a research-use plasma separator tube designed to stabilize proteins for analysis (Fig. 1EUp ) contained several peaks with m/z of ~1052, 1066, 6509, 6696, and 6880 (Fig. 1EUp ), but there was no series of peaks corresponding to a pattern for polymeric components as observed for the serum separator tubes in Fig. 1Up , A and B. The signal/noise ratios for the peaks at m/z 1052 and 1066 were substantially >20; the identities of these components are unknown. The computer algorithm did not register measures of signal/noise ratio for the peaks at m/z 6500–7000 because of the greater widths of these peaks. These peaks were considered to possibly represent aprotinin or other similar protease inhibitors added to the tube. Purified bovine aprotinin (Sigma-Aldrich) yielded a single peak coinciding with the peak from the collection tube with m/z ~6509 (not shown).

Analysis of other types of tubes for plasma collection containing citrate or heparin as additives yielded spectra with no obvious peaks (not shown). Although heparin is a heterogeneous biopolymer with a molecular mass of ~10 000, it has a strong negative charge that should lead to low detection in a positive ion mode. Heparin also is a highly polar oligosaccharide that might not be retained by the reversed-phase matrix used for sample preparation. When we used sinapinic acid as the sample matrix, which provides better detection of components with m/z >5000, extracts from blood collection tubes revealed no peaks that could be attributed to heparin (not shown).

From the results described above, we conclude that most types of commonly used blood collection tubes for serum collection add polymeric components that can be detected by MALDI TOF mass spectrometry in the m/z range 1000–3000. These peaks potentially complicate and compromise the interpretation of the patterns of low-molecular-weight peptides. A variety of procedures have been used to fractionate serum components before mass spectrometric analysis (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Whether the polymeric components from blood collection tubes will appear in the final mass spectra of these analyses is difficult to predict and will depend on multiple factors, such as interactions of polymers with plasma components, interactions with chromatographic phases, and relative ionization efficiency of polymeric components vs polypeptide components. Special research-use blood collection tubes designed to minimize peptide and protein breakdown in specimens may contain a variety of protease inhibitors. The particular type of tube tested in this study contained several components approximately the size of aprotinin.

In view of the potential interference of components shed from blood collection tubes on the mass spectrometric analysis of low-molecular-weight serum polypeptides, researchers examining patterns of low-molecular-weight peptides and proteins for diagnostic purposes would be advised to take the following precautions: (a) The type of collection tube used for a diagnostic application should be standardized, as should the procedure for specimen processing and handling. Use of a diverse range of collection tubes and procedures may complicate the interpretation of mass spectrometric analysis of serum banks collected from multiple sites or over an extended period of time during which types of collection tubes have changed. (b) Collection tubes should be tested for interference in the analysis of interest. Examination of the components eluted from tubes into a saline solution, as performed in this study, offers a simple initial check for potential interfering components. Use of saline rather than a biological fluid such as serum has the major advantage of not requiring that researchers must decide whether observed peaks represent peaks derived from the tubes or from the specimens. However, there is the caveat that this approach provides an imperfect survey of interferences with complex biological specimens. It could underestimate some potential interfering materials that would be extracted more efficiently by protein-containing solutions such as blood. This approach also may identify some potential interferents that will not be significant in a particular analysis because they will be removed by preanalytical processing steps or are present at much lower concentrations than endogenous components. Finally, some tube effects might result from extraction of specific components or interactions with the specimen, such as activation of proteases, and these types of effects would not be identified by the present type of study.

Some types of tubes designed to reduce protein degradation may contain aprotinin or other protease inhibitors that will appear as peaks in mass spectra. These components are potential interferents if they are not recognized as exogenous additives to a specimen. However, addition of exogenous protein components may not always be an undesirable characteristic of collection tubes if the added components do not overlap or mask endogenous components of interest. As well as controlling proteolysis, addition of exogenous protein components might serve useful roles such as internal standardization for recovery or mass calibration.

Collection of plasma may offer an attractive option to serum collection in that it appears to add fewer extraneous polymers from collection tubes, and greater consistency in processing is expected because there is no variation in clotting kinetics or endpoints, as there is in generation of serum. In addition, plasma would not contain the additional activation peptides from the clotting process or small peptides released from platelets, and chelation of metals with additives such as EDTA should reduce the peptidolytic activity of specimens. There is a need for further systematic evaluation of the effects of collection materials and processing procedures to apply MALDI TOF mass spectrometry reliably for diagnostic applications. Previous studies on the effects of blood collection materials and processing procedures on many other types of laboratory analyses (10)(11)(12)(13)(14) suggest that optimization and standardization of collection procedures will be an important element in reliable analysis of serum or plasma proteins by mass spectrometry for diagnostic purposes.


References

  1. Petricoin EF, III, Liotta LA. SELDI-TOF-based serum proteomic pattern diagnostics for early detection of cancer. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2004;15:24-30.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Clarke W, Zhang Z, Chan DW. The application of clinical proteomics to cancer and other diseases. Clin Chem Lab Med 2003;41:1562-1570.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Poon TCW, Yip T-T, Chan ATC, Yip C, Yip V, Mok TSK, et al. Comprehensive proteomic profiling identifies serum proteomic signatures for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma and its subtypes. Clin Chem 2003;49:752-760.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Villanueva J, Philip J, Entenberg D, Chaparro CA, Tanwar MK, Holland EC, et al. Serum peptide profiling by magnetic particle-assisted, automated sample processing and MALDI TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2004;76:1560-1570.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Diamandis EP. Proteomic patterns in biological fluids: do they represent the future of cancer diagnostics?. Clin Chem 2003;49:1272-1275.[Free Full Text]
  6. Petricoin E, III, Liotta LA. The vision for a new diagnostic paradigm. Clin Chem 2003;49:1276-1278.[Free Full Text]
  7. Check E. Running before we can walk?. Nature 2004;429:496-497.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Mehta AI, Ross S, Lowenthal MS, Fusaro V, Fishman DA, Petricoin EF, III, et al. Biomarker amplification by serum carrier protein binding. Dis Markers 2004;19:1-10.
  9. Tirumalai RS, Chan KC, Prieto DA, Issaq HJ, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD. Characterization of the low molecular weight human serum proteome. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003;2:1096-1103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Wickus GG, Mordan RJ, Mathews EA. Interference in the Allegro immunoassay system when blood is collected in silicone-coated tubes. Clin Chem 1992;38:2347-2348.[Free Full Text]
  11. Hill BM, Laessig RH, Koch DD, Hassemer DJ. Comparison of plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator (SSTTM) blood-drawing tubes for common clinical chemistry determinations. Clin Chem 1992;38:1474-1478.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Smets EML, Dijkstra-Lagemaat JE, Blankenstein MA. Influence of blood collection in plastic vs. glass evacuated serum-separator tubes on hormone and tumour marker levels. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004;42:435-439.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Sampson M, Ruddel M, Albright S, Elin RJ. Positive interference in lithium determinations from clot activator in collection container. Clin Chem 1997;43:675-679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Lusky K. Safety net: juggling the gains, losses of phlebotomy routines. CAP Today 2004;18(1):13-19.
  15. Hortin GL, Meilingeer B, Drake SK. Size-selective extraction of peptides from urine for mass spectrometric analysis. Clin Chem 2004;50:1092-1095.[Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
F. Mannello
Serum or Plasma Samples?: The "Cinderella" Role of Blood Collection Procedures Preanalytical Methodological Issues Influence the Release and Activity of Circulating Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Tissue Inhibitors, Hampering Diagnostic Trueness and Leading to Misinterpretation
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2008; 28(4): 611 - 614.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. McLerran, W. E. Grizzle, Z. Feng, W. L. Bigbee, L. L. Banez, L. H. Cazares, D. W. Chan, J. Diaz, E. Izbicka, J. Kagan, et al.
Analytical Validation of Serum Proteomic Profiling for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Sources of Sample Bias
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 44 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. A.R. Bowen, S. K. Drake, R. Vanjani, E. D. Huey, J. Grafman, and M. K. Horne III
Markedly Increased Vitamin B12 Concentrations Attributable to IgG-IgM-Vitamin B12 Immune Complexes.
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2006; 52(11): 2107 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Pilny, P. Bouchal, S. Borilova, P. Ceskova, J. Zaloudik, R. Vyzula, B. Vojtesek, and D. Valik
Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption Ionization/Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Reveals Significant Artifacts in Serum Obtained from Clot Activator-Containing Collection Devices.
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2006; 52(11): 2115 - 2116.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. L. Hortin
The MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometric View of the Plasma Proteome and Peptidome
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2006; 52(7): 1223 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. A.R. Bowen, Y. Chan, M. E. Ruddel, G. L. Hortin, G. Csako, S. J. Demosky Jr, and A. T. Remaley
Immunoassay Interference by a Commonly Used Blood Collection Tube Additive, the Organosilicone Surfactant Silwet L-720
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2005; 51(10): 1874 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. E. Banks, A. J. Stanley, D. A. Cairns, J. H. Barrett, P. Clarke, D. Thompson, and P. J. Selby
Influences of Blood Sample Processing on Low-Molecular-Weight Proteome Identified by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1637 - 1649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Baumann, U. Ceglarek, G. M. Fiedler, J. Lembcke, A. Leichtle, and J. Thiery
Standardized Approach to Proteome Profiling of Human Serum Based on Magnetic Bead Separation and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2005; 51(6): 973 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. A.R. Bowen, Y. Chan, J. Cohen, N. N. Rehak, G. L. Hortin, G. Csako, and A. T. Remaley
Effect of Blood Collection Tubes on Total Triiodothyronine and Other Laboratory Assays
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2005; 51(2): 424 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. L. Hortin
Can Mass Spectrometric Protein Profiling Meet Desired Standards of Clinical Laboratory Practice?
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 3 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drake, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hortin, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drake, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hortin, G. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS