HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: clinchem.2006.072678v1 52/9/1809    most recent Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Crone, K. G. Articles by Gronowski, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Crone, K. G. Articles by Gronowski, A. M. Related Collections Laboratory Management Current Issues in Laboratory Medicine

Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Disclosing Medical Errors

¹ Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
² Patient Safety and Quality, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, MO.
³ Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of Ohio, Toledo, OH.

^aAddress correspondence to this author at: Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8118, 660 S. Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110. Fax 314-362-1461; e-mail Gronowski{at}wustl.edu.

Background: Healthcare-related errors cause patient morbidity and mortality. Despite fear of reprimand, laboratory personnel have a professional obligation to rapidly report major medical errors when they are identified. Well-defined protocols regarding how and when to disclose a suspected error by a colleague do not exist.

Patient: We describe a woman with a well documented allergy to sulfamethoxazole who was treated with sulfadiazine that led to toxic epidermal necrolysis. After the patient’s death, the laboratory medicine resident was asked by one of the patient’s physicians to measure serum sulfadiazine, but only if the results were not reported in the patient’s electronic medical record. The case was brought to the attention of a laboratory medicine faculty member and the hospital risk management team.

Issues: Laboratorians are patient fiduciaries and are responsible for reporting errors. Most medical associations have codes of ethics that address disclosure of incompetence and errors, although the AACC’s Guide to Ethics does not. New types of error, risk management, and root-cause analyses help to shift the focus to system errors and away from individuals’ errors. This can lead to a healthcare environment that encourages truth and disclosure rather than fear and reprimand.

Disposition: The individuals involved in the presented case fulfilled their fiduciary duty to the patient by reporting this incident. An extensive investigation showed that, in fact, no medical errors or misconducts had occurred in the care of the patient.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				J. S. Krouwer More on reporting medical errors. Clin. Chem., November 1, 2006; 52(11): 2120 - 2120. [Full Text] [PDF]